Legislative Office, India
Question
Asked 13 June 2011
Theories, what they are good for ....
I was asked to set a framework for my study, so that I do not lose track of my argument...in this sense, I start with the conclusion and make my way through the whole paper to prove it. It is a kind of work that says to me to keep the same ideas, only getting them more sophisticated. With theories, we became no researchers, we became PROVERS
.......
Most recent answer
However, though the readiness to throw the falsified hypothesis is an attitude required for any research, in human sciences particularly, that should simply remain as an attitude.
In human sciences, therefore, instead of letting the initial hypothesis die, one need to keep it in a suspended animation.
We can slightly modify Falsification to hibernation. May be in some other context it may kick in.
All Answers (4)
Legislative Office, India
Conclusion is generally settled before researching the premises. However, many a time, in the process the finding may unsettle the initial objective with which the research is undertaken, thereby giving way to a revision. Rather true spirit of research lies in our readiness to trow away our hypothesis once we find its uselessness in the given context. Popperian humility is equally applicable in social science research, like it is in Philosophy of science.
Legislative Office, India
However, though the readiness to throw the falsified hypothesis is an attitude required for any research, in human sciences particularly, that should simply remain as an attitude.
In human sciences, therefore, instead of letting the initial hypothesis die, one need to keep it in a suspended animation.
We can slightly modify Falsification to hibernation. May be in some other context it may kick in.