Question
Asked 13th Mar, 2014

The DSM-IV lists approximately 297 disorders. How many disorders are listed in the DSM-5?

Having trouble finding confirmation on whether the number of diagnoses increased or decreased between editions.

Most recent answer

17th May, 2022
Gretchen Watson
Boston University
That there is so much confusion in the number of diagnoses included in the last gew DSMs is, in and of itself, indicative of a problem.

Popular answers (1)

13th Mar, 2014
Barry Turner
University of Lincoln
The listing of disorders in a diagnostic and statistical manual is highly misleading. Many of these 'disorders' are behavioural manifestations and there is no organic or physical aetiology to support a diagnosis. Certain behaviours are mistaken for symptoms and often lead to erroneous diagnoses. Many others result in a diagnosis after a period of psychopharmaceutical intervention and consequently are self fulfilling prophecies rather than disorders.
We should not concern ourselves too much with the number of disorders but the quality of the evidence that describes them. Many are plainly farcical.
5 Recommendations

All Answers (8)

13th Mar, 2014
Michael Noll-Hussong
Tagesklinik München-Westend
The total number of specific diagnoses was reduced from 172 in DSM-IV to 157 in DSM-5.
see, e.g., McCarron RM. The DSM-5 and the art of medicine: certainly uncertain. Annals of internal medicine. 2013;159(5):360-1.
5 Recommendations
13th Mar, 2014
David J Dausey
Duquesne University
The media is stating that the number of disorders is now over 300: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/17/dsm-5-unveiled-changes-disorders-_n_3290212.html
Here are some examples of disorders that were added:
13th Mar, 2014
Barry Turner
University of Lincoln
The listing of disorders in a diagnostic and statistical manual is highly misleading. Many of these 'disorders' are behavioural manifestations and there is no organic or physical aetiology to support a diagnosis. Certain behaviours are mistaken for symptoms and often lead to erroneous diagnoses. Many others result in a diagnosis after a period of psychopharmaceutical intervention and consequently are self fulfilling prophecies rather than disorders.
We should not concern ourselves too much with the number of disorders but the quality of the evidence that describes them. Many are plainly farcical.
5 Recommendations
26th Nov, 2014
Tara Davis
The University of Northampton
The pharmaceutical companies, which is the modern day driver behind psychiatric diagnosis rather than evidence-based research (how many studies quash psychotherapies as a effective treatment for mental disorders and promote drugs, or are funded by pharmaceutical companies, compared to those that are not?), want to increase their earnings and an effective way to do so is dream up more mental disorders that can then be voted in to the DSM by the American Psychiatric Association board, the National Institute of Mental Health openly declare that the DSM-5 lacks validity (it does, however, provide reliability) and other organisations such as the British Psychological Society have concerns that were largely ignored. An alternative would be the ICD-11 when it is released or use the DSM-IV-TR
1 Recommendation
9th Nov, 2018
Lucinda Huijskens
Hogeschool Utrecht
Hii, have you find an apropriate answer? I can't find it either.
18th Apr, 2019
Robin Sen
The University of Edinburgh
Hi - Came across this question looking for same information as posed here. This web page provides some helpful responses on this: http://www.jamesmorrisonmd.org/number-of-dsm-diagnoses.html - Official count of disorders in DSM-5 seems to be 157.
1 Recommendation
17th May, 2022
Gretchen Watson
Boston University
That there is so much confusion in the number of diagnoses included in the last gew DSMs is, in and of itself, indicative of a problem.

Similar questions and discussions

Related Publications

Article
Background: Diagnostic issues are at the heart of medicine. Although the existing systems to classify mental disorders have been of tremendous value to Psychiatry, there is growing pressure to reform psychiatric diagnosis. In other areas in medicine staging and profiling has been a fruitful strategy to model the diagnosis of complex disorders. Ai...
Chapter
Defining the borders of mental illness is challenging due to the lack of established validity for psychiatric disorders, a diagnostic system based largely on reported symptoms, and the highly subjective nature of distress and functional impairment. Consequently, debates about the potential perils of overdiagnosis (e.g., false positives) and underdi...
Chapter
Over the past decades, the heterogeneity of psychiatric conditions has contributed to the failure to identify biomarkers and develop personalized treatments. The challenge is that psychiatric conditions are based on a cluster of symptoms (as defined by DSM) but most likely derive from different etiologies. RDoC addresses this limitation for researc...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.