Question
Asked 28 June 2018

Spectroscopy vs Spectrometry ?

Atomic absorption spectroscopy or Atomic absorption spectrometry ?

Most recent answer

Syed Tariq Ali
University of Karachi
George Dowell , your work looks very interesting. My basic working area is natural product chemistry
1 Recommendation

Popular answers (1)

Silas Alexandria Costa
State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
Theory
Starting with what is common in these two words, firstly we must consider that both were generated from the Latin term 'spectrum'. The word 'spectrum', which means ghost or apparition, was used by Isaac Newton in the 17th century to describe the range of colors that appeared during an experiment in which sunlight passed through a glass prism along its path. Since then, the term 'spectrum' started to be used to refer to what we now call the visible light radiation. Later, the term gained new meanings in the scientific field.
When applied to the words spectroscopy and spectrometry, it makes sense that 'spectrum' refers to a discriminative graphic representation of the energy of the wave components of a system.
In spectroscopy, 'scopy' comes from the Greek term ‘σκοπέω’, which expresses the notion of examination, contemplation or observation. In spectrometry, 'metry' comes from the term 'μέτρο' (Greek as well), which in turn expresses the notion of measurement.
Therefore, SPECTROSCOPY is equivalent to a theoretical approach as a science: the science that studies the interaction between radiation and matter.
Theoretically, SPECTROMETRY, would be equivalent to a practical approach based on spectroscopy, referring to the execution of measures related to a spectrum.
It is important to note that historically, spectroscopy was originated through the study of visible light scattered through a prism. Subsequently, as well as the term ‘spectrum’ itself, the concept of spectroscopy was broadly expanded to include ANY interaction with RADIATIVE ENERGY, since matter waves and acoustic waves can now also be considered forms of radiative energy.
Practice
Pretty much, there are many terms derived from spectroscopy and spectrometry that do not necessarily preserve etymological meanings. A typical example is that in practice, the term spectrometry is actually derived from spectrophotometry, the measurement of photons as a function of wavelength, a term used for many years in astronomy. However, spectrometry is increasingly used to indicate the measurement of quantities without the use of light, as in mass spectrometry.
However, terms such as laboratory spectrometer, spectroscopist, reflectance spectroscopy, thermal emission spectroscopy, spectroradiometer, spectrophotometer, mass spectrometry etc. sometimes are common in certain scientific communities simply because they have gained prestige over time but not always because they are based on careful definitions, which causes incongruity and confusion between different areas or even within the same scientific perimeter.
Based on my own experience and on Clark, 1999 and Ball, 1995.
16 Recommendations

All Answers (22)

Pravin Kumar Tiwari
University of Liège
Essentially, spectroscopy is the study of radiated energy and matter to determine their interaction, and it does not create results on its own. Spectrometry is the application of spectroscopy so that there are quantifiable results that can then be assessed.Spectrometry deals with the measurement of a specific spectrum. There are four primary types of spectrometers:
  1. Mass spectrometry
  2. Neutron triple axis spectrometry
  3. Ion-mobility spectrometry
  4. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry
Shrikaant Kulkarni
Senior Commissioning Editor, Apple Academic Press, USA, Faculty of Business, Victorian Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Spectroscopy is an analytical tool which is study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter in the analyte in question. It is the study of absorption characteristics of the matter or absorption behaviour of the matter when subjected to electromagnetic radiation while spectrometry helps in quantification say in terms of absorbance or Optical density or transmittance.
1 Recommendation
F.s. Shanta
University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Spectroscopy refers to the study of how radiated energy and matter interact. The energy is absorbed by the matter, creating an excited state. When the matter is a metal, it is easy to see the interaction of energy and matter because the metal will produce visible evidence, usually as sparks. The interaction creates some form of electromagnetic waves (EM), often in the form of visible light, such as sparks.
Spectrometry deals with the measurement of a specific spectrum. There are four primary types of spectrometers:
Mass spectrometry Neutron triple axis spectrometry Ion-mobility spectrometry Rutherford backscattering spectrometry
John P. Hammond
Starna Scientific Limited
Spectroscopy is the theoretical science, and spectrometry is the practical measurement i.e. application of that science. So in practice, both terms are correct, it just depends on the context in which they are being used, i.e. are you discussing the science, or the practical measurement?
An interesting, and somewhat related discussion is whether or not a UV/Vis, is a spectrphotometer, or a spectrometer?
1 Recommendation
Grzegorz Boczkaj
Gdansk University of Technology
For AAS you should use the term - spectroscopy.
For MS - spectrometry.
In general definition spectrometry is a part of spectroscopy.
regards,
G
1 Recommendation
Pankaj Kumar
Society for AgroEnvironmental Sustainability
Luis F Guido
University of Porto
This a relevant question, useful in teaching.
Spectroscopy is a term used to describe measurements involving electromagnetic radiation, such as infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet spectroscopy, etc. Mass spectrometry involves molecules that are being analyzed by their fragmentation patterns, not by their interaction with the electromagnetic radiation.
The reason for the use of the term mass spectroscopy is that in the past the patterns of fragmentation of the molecules were recorded on a photographic plate and thus involved Radiation. However, modern mass spectrometers no longer use this method of analysis, and therefore the term Mass Spectroscopy is technically incorrect.
5 Recommendations
Pavel Dostálek
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
Spectroscopy is a physical field dealing with the origin and properties of spectra. Spectroscopy is based on the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with the sample. If we measure any spectra, we call this spectrometry.
2 Recommendations
Luis F Guido
University of Porto
Regarding this topic, I would like to add which is called 'zeroth law of mass spectrometry' in the Gross's textbook "Mass Spectrometry":
"First of all, never make the mistake of calling it 'mass spectroscopy'. Spectroscopy involves the absorption of electromagnetic radiation, and mass spectrometry is different. The mass spectrometrists sometimes get upset if you confuse this issue".
1 Recommendation
Wolfgang Baumann
Leibniz Institute for Catalysis
I consider it remarkable that we, usually, perform spectroscopy using a "spectrometer" rather than a "spectroscope"....
Thamina Acter
East West University
The main difference is that spectroscopy typically deals with light, mass spectrometry does not.
Miroslava Kacirova
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry
Buddhadeb Chandra
Dharampal Satyapal Limited
Hi Pravin,
Most of the analytical chemist confused at their junior level about the two term ‘spectroscopy’ and ‘spectrometry’. It can be clear by remembering following two concepts:
1. Spectroscopy is the study of interaction of matter with energy. For example NMR, IR, UV-Visible AAS etc. are spectroscopic technique.
2. Spectrometry is the balancing of matter in atomic and molecular level. For example mass spectral study is a spectrometric technique.
Therefore AAS stands for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, because in this case the atoms absorb ultraviolet or visible light and make transitions to higher electronic energy levels. The analyte concentration is determined from the amount of absorption.
Good luck.
1 Recommendation
Sridhar Lakshetti
Central Forensic Science Laboratory Hyderabad
Spectroscopy deals with interaction of the electromagnetic radiation with the matter i.absorption or emmission of radiation. Whereas spectrometry deals with the bombardment of the sample with high energy electric beam which brings the breaking of the molecules to smaller fragment ions.
3 Recommendations
Saira Nayab
Kyungpook National University
Spectroscopy deals with the interaction of matter, i. e., atoms, ions and molecules, with EMR. Its a physical phenomenon invlove excitation and/or de-excitation of electrons. Its non-destructive technique mostly. Mass spectrometery make use of high accelerated electrons instead of EMR, and convert the sample i to small fragments. Thus its a destructive technique.
AA spectroscopy is correct as in this technique the free atoms intereact with EMR (coming from a line source) and using Beer's Law the concentration of the analyte atom can be determined.
Silas Alexandria Costa
State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
Theory
Starting with what is common in these two words, firstly we must consider that both were generated from the Latin term 'spectrum'. The word 'spectrum', which means ghost or apparition, was used by Isaac Newton in the 17th century to describe the range of colors that appeared during an experiment in which sunlight passed through a glass prism along its path. Since then, the term 'spectrum' started to be used to refer to what we now call the visible light radiation. Later, the term gained new meanings in the scientific field.
When applied to the words spectroscopy and spectrometry, it makes sense that 'spectrum' refers to a discriminative graphic representation of the energy of the wave components of a system.
In spectroscopy, 'scopy' comes from the Greek term ‘σκοπέω’, which expresses the notion of examination, contemplation or observation. In spectrometry, 'metry' comes from the term 'μέτρο' (Greek as well), which in turn expresses the notion of measurement.
Therefore, SPECTROSCOPY is equivalent to a theoretical approach as a science: the science that studies the interaction between radiation and matter.
Theoretically, SPECTROMETRY, would be equivalent to a practical approach based on spectroscopy, referring to the execution of measures related to a spectrum.
It is important to note that historically, spectroscopy was originated through the study of visible light scattered through a prism. Subsequently, as well as the term ‘spectrum’ itself, the concept of spectroscopy was broadly expanded to include ANY interaction with RADIATIVE ENERGY, since matter waves and acoustic waves can now also be considered forms of radiative energy.
Practice
Pretty much, there are many terms derived from spectroscopy and spectrometry that do not necessarily preserve etymological meanings. A typical example is that in practice, the term spectrometry is actually derived from spectrophotometry, the measurement of photons as a function of wavelength, a term used for many years in astronomy. However, spectrometry is increasingly used to indicate the measurement of quantities without the use of light, as in mass spectrometry.
However, terms such as laboratory spectrometer, spectroscopist, reflectance spectroscopy, thermal emission spectroscopy, spectroradiometer, spectrophotometer, mass spectrometry etc. sometimes are common in certain scientific communities simply because they have gained prestige over time but not always because they are based on careful definitions, which causes incongruity and confusion between different areas or even within the same scientific perimeter.
Based on my own experience and on Clark, 1999 and Ball, 1995.
16 Recommendations
Abdul Azeez
Seton Hall University
Simple classification:
Spectroscopy implies the interaction of matters with electromagnetic waves.
Spectrometry implies the measurement of spectra for qualitative or quantitative analysis.
Bilal Malik
University of Kashmir
Scope refers to observe and metry refers to measurement. But don't w get measurement or spectrum from Spectroscope?
George Dowell
Viscom Inc
Dear Bilal Malik,
in my humble view, "scope" means to look at and consider, Metrics means to measure or "meter".
Therefore "scopes" of all kinds, including telescopes, microscopes, oscilloscopes, spectroscopes, merely present and display something to be looked and considered, in other words, measured, by a person, machine or computer.
Gamma Ray and X-Ray spectroscopes provide, organize, and display the raw data, the measurement of that data would therefore be called spectrometry.
This is from a technician's point of view.
I may add again in my opinion, "Light" means the whole electromagnetic spectrum, not just visible light (as can be seen by humans). Therefore, in my field, radio, infrared (i.e. "heat"), visible light, X-Rays and Gamma Rays are all just different energy levels of "light".
George Dowell
GEOelectronics
Syed Tariq Ali
University of Karachi
In my opinion, when we deal with wave nature (like absorption, emission) of EMR is falls in the category of "scopey", while deal with particle nature of EMR (like reflection, dispersion, diffraction) falls in "metery".
1 Recommendation
George Dowell
Viscom Inc
Interesting viewpoint Syed. In my sub-discipline we deal with only single, individual photons, individually measured according to their energy levels, but only one at a time, at the speed of light.
George W. Dowell
Syed Tariq Ali
University of Karachi
George Dowell , your work looks very interesting. My basic working area is natural product chemistry
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Disappearing peaks in LC-MS ?
Question
19 answers
  • Dileep SinghDileep Singh
I am working on developing a method for analyzing about 28 PPCPs. Calibration, SPE recovery, and all necessary validations were completed. However, I recently encountered an issue where the peaks for four compounds (eluting between RT 14–19 minutes) just disappeared. I prepared fresh standards and re-ran the analysis, but the peaks remained absent.
To troubleshoot, I switched to an isocratic method using the composition at which these compounds were previously eluting. This resulted in the detection of only 2 out of the 4 compounds, and even those appeared with very low intensity.
Since we have another high-resolution mass spectrometer (QTOF), I screened the standard mixture on it and observed all four compounds with good intensity.
We then performed maintenance on our HPLC-MS (This is the system we are using for quantification) system with the single quadrupole detector, including cleaning the ion guide, replacing the pump oil, and conducting other performance optimizations. After maintenance, we successfully detected peaks for seven new target compounds with good intensity, which were previously undetectable. However, the four problematic compounds still did not appear, even when tested at higher concentrations (up to 400 ppb).
I also tried running the analysis without the diverter valve, but the results were unchanged.
My current gradient is as follows:
0–1.5 minutes: 20% B
1.5–8 minutes: Linear increase to 80% B
8–9 minutes: Increase to 95% B, held until 20 minutes
20–23 minutes: Return to initial conditions (20% B)
23–36 minutes: Re-equilibration
Mobile phases:
A: 0.1% formic acid in water
B: Methanol
Flow rate: 0.3 mL, Injection volume: 10uL
The column in use is a SunFire C18 (4.6 × 250 mm). I am unsure what might have caused this. Please help with this or suggest what I should try now. Thanks so much

Related Publications

Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.