Discussion
Started 31 July 2019

Multiple Signals Problem in Sequencing Result

Our research work involves identification of Ganoderma spp. isolates using ITS region. We purified the PCR product and then sent for sequencing. Prior to PCR amplification, we cultured the fungus on PDA and extracted the mycelia DNAs using conventional method or available kits. However, we are now facing multiple signals problem in the acquired sequencing results. One way to counter this problem is cloning and this work is currently undertaken. Another primers for identification such as transcription elongation factor (tef) etc will also be used in the next PCR amplification.
Nevertheless, we would like to get any suggestion, recommendation or advice regarding this multiple signals problem from your experience and expertise.

All replies (3)

Frederic Lepretre
University of Lille
sequencing issues find often their origins in PCR miss amplification. How did you design your primers? are they specific to your target species? are your samples free from contamination?
the first thing you can try is to test your primers in primer-blast from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome). just put your primers and change the organism, and you'll see what you're supposed to amplify.
fred
From my experiences, problems with sequencing have always been either because of inadequate DNA concentration (either after extraction or after PCR) or by using an ineffective PCR DNA polymerase (low processivity or no proof reading).
Since there are a variety of ITS primers, I recommend this article that worked with the Ganoderma genus.
  • Jargalmaa et al. (2017), Taxonomic evaluation of selected Ganoderma species and database sequence validation. PeerJ 5:e3596; DOI 10.7717/peerj.3596
Also this one which did not identify single-genus species:
  • Abe, C. et al. (2015), Fungi Isolated from Maize (Zea mays L.) Grains and Production of Associated Enzyme Activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15328-15346; doi:10.3390/ijms160715328
Tef amplification will be useful for comparing with database ITS fragments and further validating your results, but first you have to get the sequencing right.
Salwa Abdullah Sirajuddin
Malaysian Palm Oil Board
Apologize for the late reply.
Thank you very much for your suggestions and journals recommendation. We really appreciate them.
As for now, we're currently trying to ascertain that our samples are free from contamination as Dr Frederic mentioned above and to test the role of pre- and post-processes from DNA extraction to product purification as Dr Cristina suggested.

Similar questions and discussions

Why is a universal transcript lower expressed as an isoform-specific transcript with qPCR?
Question
6 answers
  • Alena Marie BubeckAlena Marie Bubeck
I have a gene with four different known transcript I`d like to quantify via qPCR (TaqMan). The gene locus was sequenced and the different known transcripts of the gene were found in the sequencing data. So I used the sequence to design specific primers (products size 118-143bp) for the exons that are unique for the isoforms and also one universal primer pair targeting an exon which is present in all variants. I designed all of them to be exon-exon spanning, except one, where it was not possible. The primers were tested for specificity in silco and also the PCR products were analyzed with the BioAnalyzer (DNA 1000 kit). Just the primer pairs that show a specific band of the expected product size were used for qPCR (qPCR conditions: 95°C-20sec; (95°C-1sec, 60°C-20sec)x40)
After carrying out the qPCR triplicates for each sample (4 samples from three different donors), I got this result:
The universal primer is lower expressed than the isoform-specific one. (The CT value for the most expressed isoform is on average 2 cycles lower than for the universal primer)
As they all target different Exons along the transcript I thought about a 3'-end bias in poly-T priming. But the cDNA synthesis was carried out using the Qiagen QuantiTEC kit, which includes a mix of oligo-dT and random primers, which should prevent or minimize the bias.
Furthermore I`m thinking about sequencing the products to make sure that the products match exactly the transcript I want to, even though the BioAnalyzer results were specific.
Does anyone have an idea what might be wrong or how to interpret the data? Or can help me with further ideas of what to inspect.
Thanks in advance!

Related Publications

Article
Fungi belonging to the Ganoderma genus have been widely studied because of their phytopatogenic and medicinal potential. However, due to its morphological variability, the genus has been considered in a status of "taxonomic chaos". In this study, a specimen of the Ganoderma genus originary of the State of Veracruz (México) was isolated and describe...
Article
Los hongos se dispersan principalmente por esporas que son liberadas a la atmósfera; en ella la cantidad y el tipo de fungosporas depende de muchos factores, entre ellos la hora del día, la actividad humana, la velocidad y dirección del viento. El género Ganoderma ha sido estudiado debido a sus propiedades medicinales, pero resulta paradójico que s...
Article
Full-text available
Fungi belonging to the Ganoderma genus have been widely studied because of their phytopatogenic and medicinal potential. However, due to its morphological variability, the genus has been considered in a status of "taxonomic chaos". In this study, a specimen of the Ganoderma genus originary of the State of Veracruz (México) was isolated and describe...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.