Asked 20th Mar, 2023

Is the multiple correlation coefficient (R) undefined in the case of negative determination coefficients (Artificial Neural Networks)?

I noticed that in some very bad models of neural networks, the value of R² (coefficient of determination) can be negative. That is, the model is so bad that the mean of the data is better than the model.
In linear regression models, the multiple correlation coefficient (R) can be calculated using the root of R². However, this is not possible for a model of neural networks that presents a negative R². In that case, is R mathematically undefined?
I tried calculating the correlation y and y_pred (Pearson), but it is mathematically undefined (division by zero). I am attaching the values.
Obs.: The question is about artificial neural networks.

Most recent answer

David Eugene Booth
Kent State University
Raid, apologies here's the attachment. David Booth
1 Recommendation

All Answers (5)

David Eugene Booth
Kent State University
R**2 cannot be negative. Adjusted R**2 can sometimes be because of the adjusted number of degrees of freedom in the denominator. See most good linear statistical models text books. Best wishes David Booth
Raid Amin
University of West Florida
I don't know, but my first thought here is "why even dwell on it here?"
In regression analysis we often use the coefficient of determination (R**2). It is a useful metric for fit but not for prediction when you need to measure how stable the regression model is. Here, a suggested change to R**2 is to replace SSE with PRESS, and we get R**2(pred)= 1- (PRESS/SSTotal). It can happen that the model is so bad that PRESS>SS Total. R**2(pred)<0 then. I would say, here it is best to either state that R**2(pred) is undefined or set it to zero. The prediction oriented R**2 looks really bad.
David Eugene Booth
Kent State University
Raid PRESS invented 1970s by David Allen of U Kentucky is not a good idea either. See things like AIC and BIC and how to handle prediction models in general. Some references can be found in the attached. IN ANY CASE R**2 cannot be less than 0 but it is well known adjusted R**2 can. Best wishes David Booth
1 Recommendation
David Eugene Booth
Kent State University
Raid, apologies here's the attachment. David Booth
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Multiple Linear regression unmet assumptions, what can I do?
4 answers
  • Abdelkarim KharadjiAbdelkarim Kharadji
Hello everyone!
I need your help with some work I am doing.
Some context first:
I am writing a dissertation for my master. The topic is about perceived trust in Smart Home technology. I launched a survey with a closed ended questions for demographic data, and likert scale that asks 8 Questions on a scale of 1 to 5. I gathered 159 responses in total.
The 8 Questions in ther likert scale are actually 4 different dependent variables. Q1/Q2 make dependent variable1, Q3/Q4 dependent variable 2 etc.
Since it's a likert scale the data is not an interval, so what I did is that I took the sum of Q1 and Q2 and divided it by 2, which gave me a mean. This mean is one of the 4 dependent variables. I did this an additional 3 times for the other 3.
The idea is to test each one of these dependent variables and see if they can be predicted with the independent variables (and control variables) that I have ( age, gender, educational attainment, household size and income).
For that I read that a multiple linear regression would be enough. So I started reading about that method and I saw that there were some assumptions that needed to be met before I could use that method. For normality (3 of the 4dependent variables were normally distributed, but the last one had was not quite normally distributed. Secondly, it seems that testing the the four variables for linearity resulted in all of them not being linear.
Now I need to start the analysis part of my dissertation but I have no clue wich method I should use since the assumptions of the multiple linear regression are not met.
I know about non-parametric tests, but I can't find anything non-parametric alternative for the multiple linear regression.
If you need more info about the variables etc let me know, I will provide them!
Thanks for your help and time.
How to calculate power for a 2-level model with two L1-predictors?
Be the first to answer
  • Janna HämpkeJanna Hämpke
I am new to power analysis in multi-level models. I am looking for a possibility to do a power analysis for the following 2-level model: Y = y00 + y10*D1 + y20*D2+y01*Z +y11*D1Z+y21*D2Z.
In this model, I investigate the effect of time (D1 and D2) and an experimental condition as well as their interaction effect on my outcome variable. The time is measured three times and integrated as dummy-coded contrasts in the model (D1 and D2). The experimental condition is also dummy-coded.
I tried to work with the instruction for a power analysis in 2-level models by Trend & Schäfer (2019) (see R code attached). However, I do not know how create the conditional variances for my model and I think there must be a mistake in the model .
I would be very happy to get your advice. Thanks a lot!
R code:
#Specifying standardized input parameters
alpha.S <- .05 #Alpha level
Size.clus <- 3 #L1 sample size
N.clus <- 200 #L2 sample size
L1_DE_standardized <- .30 #L1 direct effects
L2_DE_standardized <- .50 #L2 direct effect
CLI_E_standardized <- .50 #CLI effects
ICC <- .50 #ICC <- .09 #Standardized random slope
#Creating variables for power simulation in z-standardized form
#Creates a dataset with two L1-predictor x and one L2-predictor Z; all predictors are dichotomous
Size.clus <- 3 #L1 sample size
N.clus <- 200 #L2 sample size
x<- scale(rep(1:Size.clus))
g <- as.factor(1:N.clus)
X <- cbind(expand.grid("x"=x, "g"=g))
X <- cbind(X, EG)
X$D1<- recode(var = X$x,
recodes = "-1 = 0; 0 = 1; 1 = 0")
X$D2<- recode(var = X$x,
recodes = "-1 = 0; 0 = 0; 1 = 1")
#Adapting the standardized parameters
varL1 <- 1 #L1 variance component
varL2 <- ICC/(1-ICC) #L2 variance component
varRS1 <-*varL1 #Random slope variance tau 11
varRS2 <-*varL1 #Random slope variance tau 22
L1_DE <- L1_DE_standardized*sqrt(varL1) #L1 direct effect
L2_DE <- L2_DE_standardized*sqrt(varL2) #L2 direct effect
CLI_E <- CLI_E_standardized*sqrt(varRS) #CLI effect
#Creating conditional variances
#I don’t know how to calculate this conditional variance with two L1 predictor
s <- sqrt((varL1)*(1-(L1_DE_standardized^2))) #L1 variance
V1 <- varL2*(1-(L2_DE_standardized^2)) #L2 variance
rand_sl.con <- varRS1*(1-(CLI_E_standardized^2)) #Random slope variance
#Creating a population model for simulation
b <- c(0, L1_DE, L1_DE, L2_DE, CLI_E,CLI_E) #vector of fixed effects (fixed intercept, L1.1. direct, L1.2. direct, L2 direct, CLI.1 effect, CLI.2 effect)
V2 <- matrix(c(V1,0,0, 0,rand_sl.con,0, 0,0,rand_sl.con), 3) #Random effects covariance matrix with covariances set to 0
# there must be a mistake some steps before that the model doesn't work
model <- makeLmer(y ~ D1 + D2 + EG + D1:EG + D2:EG +(D1+D2 | g), fixef = b, VarCorr = V2, sigma = s, data = X) #Model creation
Comparing paired samples t test results of two independent samples?
23 answers
  • Yusuf PolatYusuf Polat
Consider this: I gave a treatment to my Experiment group (K-12 students) to see if it will affect their motivation while my Control group did not receive the said treatment. I checked the Experiment group's pretest and posttest (paried samples t test) results and observed that there was a significant difference. However, I don't want to make a conclusion over this single finding since motivation is too broad of a concept under the influence of many factors. Therefore, I also checked the Control group's pretest posttest (paired samples t test) results and found out that there was a significant difference in them as well. Furthermore, I also ran an independent samples t test between the Experiment group and the Control group before and after the treatment for a different research question, and there were no significant differences in either situation between the two groups.
Question 1: Is this technically appropriate? I mean comparing and then drawing a conclusion from paired samples t test results of two independent samples?
Question 2: If your answer is yes to the above question, can I draw a conclusion like this relying on two separate paired samples t tests: Treatment has no role in the motivation of students.
Question 3: Can I draw a conclusion like this relying on the independent samples t tests: There is no difference between students who receive the treatment and those who does not receive the treatment in terms of their motivation.
Any answer is highly appreciated for either of the questions. Thanks a lot in advance for taking time.

Related Publications

Full-text available
Runoff prediction has an important role in hydrology, water management, flood prediction and socio-economical concern. The effective flood management is always of great apprehension in the field of hydrology and water resources engineering. The present study shows the comparison of various training algorithms available for training multi-layer perc...
Full-text available
Performance of silt extractors has been the issue for field engineers. Due to wide variations in observed and computed removal efficiencies as obtained by empirical and analytical relationships, it is difficult to operate and maintain extractors. The present study investigates the performance of commonly employed relationship for estimation of remo...
Conference Paper
In this paper, the generalized profile function models, GPFMs, based on linear regression and neural networks, are compared. GPFM provides an approximation of individual models (models of individual stem profile) facility using only two basic measurements. GPFM based on neural network is obtained as the average of all available normalized individua...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.