Question
Asked 13th Sep, 2019
  • alex-korolev.jimdo.com

Is the measuring method of Earth rotation speed with an optical gyroscope the same as of local rotation measurement of the gyroscope base?

Optical fiber (or ring laser) gyroscopes with enough sensitivity allow measurements of Earth speed rotation. Let us suppose that the frame of such a gyroscope is located in the plane orthogonal to the rotational axis of the Earth and can be slowly rotated with a motor. Will the signal (proportional to the phase shift or frequency difference) double in the case of artifical rotation speed = Earth rotation speed in comparence with the case when the motor is switched off? Has anyone done a similar experiment, who knows?

Most recent answer

16th Sep, 2019
Alexander I. Korolev
alex-korolev.jimdo.com
Let's imagine that the light in optical gyroscope propagate in some medium (aether). Then, let's imagine that this medium can rotate together with the gyroscope due to gravity entrainment. This rotation may be weak, but measurable.
Aether wind searching at Earth surface give no result. Thus, Earth orbital movement around the Sun, Milky Way (etc.) should be together with the aether. More likely, the aether does not rotate due to Earth orbiting, yes. Technically, it can be checked. The gyroscope for this should being oriented during a year towards Sun's center by stellar orientation system, for example. The signal of interest can be obtained using low pass filtering.
Aether gravity spinning can explain Mercury perihelion shift, for example. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_perihelion_shift_of_Mercury_be_caused_by_luminiferous_medium_aether_wind

All Answers (4)

13th Sep, 2019
Mike Albert
Fibertek
The gyroscope indicates its own rate of rotation regardless as to how that rate of rotation is arrived at. Assuming the gyroscope is oriented so that it is sensitive to earth rate, when your motorized table is off the gyroscope is rotating at the same rate as the earth and will indicate that it is rotating at earth rate. When your motorized table is on, if it is rotating the same direction as the earth then the gyroscope will be rotating twice as fast as the earth and will indicate 2X earth rate. If the table is rotating opposite the earth, the gyroscope won't be rotating at all and will indicate no rate (to its best precision)
13th Sep, 2019
Alexander I. Korolev
alex-korolev.jimdo.com
Dear Mike,
Thank you for explanation. It is clear for me as it should be in theory. But in the experiment there may be some deviation. As I know, for example, the rotation of Earth around Sun is not registered by optical gyroscopes though sensitivity can be quite enough for this.
13th Sep, 2019
Mike Albert
Fibertek
The gyroscope will measure all rates to its level of accuracy and precision. There are no true rotations that for some unexplained reason don't show up in the answer. Orbiting the sun does not intrinsically mean the Earth is rotating, and there doesn't have to be any measurable rotational rate associated with orbiting. However, there is an interesting effect.
We know that the Earth's axis is at a 23 degree tilt to the plane of the ecliptic, but suppose for a second it wasn't tilted at all. The axis of the earth's rotation and the axis of the Earth's orbit would be parallel. You would not be able to distinguish one from the other. Now suppose the Earth didn't rotate, but rather the same side always faced ... NOT THE SUN ... but some distant fixed star. Should you measure a rotation rate? The Earth would not have any angular velocity. It isn't rotating. The rate is zero. That isn't a measurement problem. Zero is the correct answer. Going around an orbit doesn't intrinsically equal a rotation.
Now suppose the Earth kept the same side always facing the Sun (tidally locked). The Earth would rotate once per year, and you would measure that rate. Note that one rotation per year = NO days. Orbiting around the sun means that the rotation rate has to produce one more rotation per year than there are days in the year.
There are 365.249 days per year, so you might expect to measure the earth's rotation rate as 365.249 rotations per 365.249 days = 1 rotation/day. However, Look up the Earth's sidereal rotation period and instead of 24 hours you find 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.1 seconds. The earth rate is actually 366.249 rotations/365.249 days. There is that one extra rotation I mentioned. If you measure Earth rate to better than 1/365 accuracy, this extra rotation will be apparent in the answer.
So orbiting doesn't in itself produce rotation, but since we tend to measure our rotation relative to the sun, orbiting does confuse us as to what the Earth's rotational rate is.
The fact that the Earth's rotation axis is tilted has essentially no effect on this idea.
1 Recommendation
16th Sep, 2019
Alexander I. Korolev
alex-korolev.jimdo.com
Let's imagine that the light in optical gyroscope propagate in some medium (aether). Then, let's imagine that this medium can rotate together with the gyroscope due to gravity entrainment. This rotation may be weak, but measurable.
Aether wind searching at Earth surface give no result. Thus, Earth orbital movement around the Sun, Milky Way (etc.) should be together with the aether. More likely, the aether does not rotate due to Earth orbiting, yes. Technically, it can be checked. The gyroscope for this should being oriented during a year towards Sun's center by stellar orientation system, for example. The signal of interest can be obtained using low pass filtering.
Aether gravity spinning can explain Mercury perihelion shift, for example. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_perihelion_shift_of_Mercury_be_caused_by_luminiferous_medium_aether_wind

Similar questions and discussions

Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction is wrong based on Sagnac's experiment
Discussion
2 replies
  • Tsutomu TomishimaTsutomu Tomishima
I uploaded 5 days ago has been completely updated.
It is intuitively understandable with three diagrams.
Read within 3 minutes and immediately know the Lorentz contraction is wrong.
Also you can find that the ultra speed of light are observed in your immediate daily life.
=============================================
Lorentz contraction is wrong! Here is the explanation.
Even if you are not a #physics expert, the content is understandable
Conclution
Light emitted from a light source is added to the speed of the light source.
Rotating the interferometer, as in Sagnac's experiment, produces a light Doppler effect in which the orbital speed changes continuously. There are orthogonal points and large interference fringes can be observed.
The Lorentz contraction hypothesis is wrong and cannot explain the large interference fringes in Sagnac's experiment.
Main Content Start
Michelson-Morley
Lorentzian contractions were recognized from two experiments 120 years ago.
The Michelson-Morley experiment and the Sagnac experiment.
I will review the experimental results to reveal the true nature of nature.
Please see attached picture Fig2_San.jpg
Michelson Morley was an experiment confirming the existence of the aether.
A prism is used to split the light into two paths and finally join them together. Interference fringes of light are created when there is a speed difference between two light paths.
Result is
1. The interference fringes were small and aether could not be proved.
2. Earth's rotation and revolution do not affect the experiment
The Sagnac experiment
The Sagnac experiment was a set of Michelson-Morley experiments mounted on a rotating disk. expected the same result
Please see attached picture Fig1_MM.jpg
However, for some reason, large interference fringes were observed.
Everyone didn't find the reason at the time
So the physics world accepted the Lorentz contraction hypothesis that the rotation speed of the disk shortens the distance, changes the speed of light, and creates interference fringes.
True fact of The Sagnac experiment
The real natural phenomenon shown by the Sagnac experiment is:
The revolution speed of the earth is added to the light emitted from the light source. As the disk rotates, the addition of the earth's revolution speed changes continuously. It is Doppler effect of light.
In particular, when the direction of light and the direction of revolution are orthogonal, the added speed becomes zero. Maximum interference fringes are produced.
Please see attached picture Fig3_Evo.jpg
The estimation for the speed of the light.
The speed which is added to the orinal light speed(3*10**8 m/sec) is :
1. The case of Revolution speed : 30000m/sec
2. The case of Rotation speed : 460m/ sec
3. Disk rotates speed of Sagnac experiment might be less than 10m /sec
The Lorentz contraction hypothesis cannot explain the large interference fringes in Sagnac's experimental results because of too slower speed.
Because
Oceanic controlled continental fragmentation?
Question
10 answers
  • Taissir NouriTaissir Nouri
Oceanic Waters center of gravitation should be attracted to the center of gravity of the Earth. However, because the water of the oceans is different from the solid mass of the Earth, the water of the oceans might be slightly attracted to the gravity of the Moon differently from the rest of the solid mass of the Earth. This differences in the gravitational masses between the oceanic water and the solid Mass of the Earth would be enhanced by the tilting of the Earth seasonally 23.5 degrees? The real shape of the Earth probably isn't an even because the astroids hit Earth and have added to its mass unevenly, so the Earth rotate unevenly and the water covers the surface mostly evenly to make up the difference but the will affect the gravitational masses and all be attracted to the center mass of the largest mass which is the Earth it self center of gravity; however the water being liquid which maintain volume but not shape the character that is different from solid matter which is important in gravitational centers determinations. And that is why most likely we are having gravitational centers shifting and summing up to a new final total gravitational mass for the whole Earth constantly. The key point is there water can't keep it's shape therefore it's center of gravity is different from the rest of the solid mass of the Earth and this should be happening constantly causing the water vs land distribution constantly seeking hypothetical equilibrium or an ideal gravitational mass which satisfy all physical conditions? Probably all these could be calculated? That's the South Pole, what happens if the South Pole's land losses it's private protection of the glacier s? Increase in liquid water vs land lateral pressure? This might soften the South Pole anchoring position? If so, the South Pole could be lost? The Earth loses its geographical poles? Earth try to re-establish new other geographical Poles or Rotation of the Earth will wobble? Earth go out of it's solar orbit? not sure about the time frame nor the climate nor life? https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientists-warm-water-vital-point-063457873.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/thwaites-glacier-antarctica-185028043.html

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
We review the current status of large ring laser gyroscopes having the potential to contributeto terrestrial measurements of general relativistic precessions. At this point in time, although thesedevices possess the raw sensitivity for such a measurement, they remain limited by long-term geometricinstability, detection noise and imperfections in th...
Article
Passive ring laser resonator of square size with a side 3.1 m is created in Sternberg State Astronomical Institute for the determination of the Earth angular rate. This work deals with the construction of resonator and mode-matching system, estimation of the resonator parameters, influence of the temperature variations on the mode structure, contro...
Article
Ring laser gyroscopes have increased in sensitivity by six orders of magnitude over the last several decades such that they are poised to make valuable contributions to geodesy and terrestrial tests of general relativity. To fully exploit their capabilities, residual (time varying) read out errors arising from backscatter coupling must be physicall...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.