The ICFAI University, Himachal Pradesh
Discussion
Started 7 October 2021
Is NOVA publishing reliable?
Hello
I have been contacted by both LAMBERT and NOVA publishing to publish a book with them. Which one would be the best? Are they real publishers? I have seen their titles on Amazon (with the latter being very expensive), but are they worth or would they actually harm me as an author?
Thank you
Most recent answer
Yes, I had the privilege of publishing my book with Nova Science Publishers in 2024, and I am pleased to share that it is also indexed in the Scopus database. Nova is a highly regarded and reputable academic publisher, known for its commitment to quality research across various disciplines. My experience with them was truly positive, as they provided excellent support throughout the publishing process. Their professionalism and dedication to academic excellence were commendable. I am grateful for the opportunity to work with such a distinguished publisher and would highly recommend them to fellow researchers and scholars.
2 Recommendations
Popular replies (1)
Charlemagne College, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Dear Luigi Marongiu ,
For NOVA Science Publishers it is somewhat ambiguous.Update 22-08-2022 They are as indicated by Abdul Hakim Abdul Basir mentioned in the vanity press list of the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net/vanity-press/ ) and according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_Science_Publishers they are (partly) recognized by the Norwegian list of approved scientific publishing channels. So, some credibility because of their WoS indexing (check http://wokinfo.com/mbl/ ) but some indications for being (close to) dubious as well.
Lambert is mentioned in the Beall’s list under Vanity Press (https://beallslist.net/vanity-press/ ) as well. But with way more red flags see also the following links:
And one of the many other questions/discussions here on RG:
Conclusion: avoid Lambert (LAP) and NOVA is somewhat borderline.
Best regards.
7 Recommendations
All replies (19)
University of Hohenheim
Thanks for the link, it was very interesting. For starters, both the links http://wokinfo.com/mbl/publishers/?utm_source=false&utm_medium=false&utm_campaign=false and have listed NOVA but not LAMBERT, suggesting that the former is better than the latter. Of course, it is not Wiley, but as a beginner...
So I think the answer to my question is: Nova Science Publishers is better than Lambert (LIT).
2 Recommendations
Shivaji University
NOVA publishing you have to confirm whether it is predatory publisher or not, then proceed.
University of Hohenheim
Well, that was the implicit question. I could NOT find evidence that either Nova or Lambert are listed as predatory...
Charlemagne College, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Dear Luigi Marongiu ,
For NOVA Science Publishers it is somewhat ambiguous.Update 22-08-2022 They are as indicated by Abdul Hakim Abdul Basir mentioned in the vanity press list of the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net/vanity-press/ ) and according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_Science_Publishers they are (partly) recognized by the Norwegian list of approved scientific publishing channels. So, some credibility because of their WoS indexing (check http://wokinfo.com/mbl/ ) but some indications for being (close to) dubious as well.
Lambert is mentioned in the Beall’s list under Vanity Press (https://beallslist.net/vanity-press/ ) as well. But with way more red flags see also the following links:
And one of the many other questions/discussions here on RG:
Conclusion: avoid Lambert (LAP) and NOVA is somewhat borderline.
Best regards.
7 Recommendations
University of Science Malaysia
Nova Science Publishers now listed under vanity press
7 Recommendations
Henan Agricultural University
NOVA Science Publishers is better as it is listed with the WoS. Check the following links for more clarifications:
Though don't have information about Lambert but will rather suggest going for Nova Science Publishers Inc.
Thanks
1 Recommendation
Carrington Rand
Nova Science Publishers are neither a vanity publisher nor predatory. They are not WoS indexed, but rather, they submit all their manuscripts to SCOPUS for indexation. I understand 80% of these submissions are indexed by SCOPUS, which is good evidence of quality. They also have a rigorous peer review process and the peer reviewers' notes are submitted to SCOPUS. I would advise against judging any publisher based on the remarks of a recent doctoral graduate. I note further that having to edit your own manuscript is not a sign of a publisher being a vanity press. All scholarly authors must edit their own work. The publishers usually only do copy proofing, spell and grammar checks. Academic publishing is not the same as celebrity biographies or fiction novels.
5 Recommendations
I have published twenty books with NOVA Science Publishers. Many of the books and book chapters have been widely cited. For example, a book chapter about Job Analysis has been downloaded nearly 90,000 times over the past five years and continues to be downloaded by scholars and practitioners over 150 times each week.
The reality is that many publishers have struggled due to the realities of the WWW making articles and books accessible without requiring readers to purchase a book.
I have enjoyed my association with NOVA Science Publishers and recommend that scholars give it serious consideration.
Cam Caldwell
1 Recommendation
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi
@cam Caldwell
I recieved an invitation from Nova to publish a book chapter. But for submiting the manuscript they asked to send it by mail. Is this ok? As usually we submit manuscripts via the publisher website and not by sending e-mail. Can you please advise?
Thanks in advance
1 Recommendation
University of Hohenheim
Sounds weird, what is this? the XX century? Are you sure the email is genuine? Do you have to pay something?
Duke University
Just published a book with Nova Science Publishers:
The entire process was smooth. They have good and responsive people there.
It did not cost me a penny (except my time as an editor) so I don't see how it could even be predatory.
I now wait to know if they will hold their word regarding the royalties, they say it takes around 2 years to know how many books were sold precisely.
P.S. Royalties at Nova are much higher than those of their competitors, and even if we don't get rich on these books, it's still an important aspect to bear in mind.
1 Recommendation
"Burgos" Laboratory of Psychobiological Research
I have published several Chapters, some Editions and a Book with Nova Science Publishers, and in all instances have been a good and reliable experiences.
3 Recommendations
Universiti Teknologi Brunei
Recently, I published two book chapters with Nova Scientific and the communication was thru email without any cost.
1 Recommendation
The ICFAI University, Himachal Pradesh
Yes, I had the privilege of publishing my book with Nova Science Publishers in 2024, and I am pleased to share that it is also indexed in the Scopus database. Nova is a highly regarded and reputable academic publisher, known for its commitment to quality research across various disciplines. My experience with them was truly positive, as they provided excellent support throughout the publishing process. Their professionalism and dedication to academic excellence were commendable. I am grateful for the opportunity to work with such a distinguished publisher and would highly recommend them to fellow researchers and scholars.
2 Recommendations
Similar questions and discussions
Is IGI Global a Vampire Publisher?
I recently followed a link to a call for book chapter proposals from IGI Global. It took less than 24 hours for a confirmation email to be accepted after submitting a proposal for the chapter. It was utterly unexpected to receive a response so quickly and with such forewarning. When you search for their reputation, the first thing you notice is that one of the most popular search terms is “IGI GLOBAL PREDATORY”. Then there’s a long list of warnings from multiple writers and blogs.
Then I have tried to explore this more seriously. I have read the experience shared by Professor Dr. Ahmad R Pratama of Universitas Islam Indonesia. I am copying his post below:
***************************************************
"In my country (Indonesia), Scopus and Web of Science are used as a whitelist system (in addition to SINTA, the national indexing system for domestic publications only). Both by universities and the ministry of education (yes, the government decides who gets to be an assistant/associate/full professor). But they also use Beall’sBeall’s List (including the new one with an anonymous author behind it) as a blacklist system.
Publishing an article in a journal on the blacklist is far worse than publishing a paper, not on the whitelist. And if a journal is listed on the whitelist, but the publisher is listed on the blacklist, the blacklist wins! Today, I learned it the hard way.
I submitted an article to an IGI Global journal last year (Oct 2019), got a significant revision in Dec 2019, accepted in Feb 2020, and finally published earlier this month. It is hurting my career in academia instead of helping me build my reputation and advance my career, at least in this country.
The worse part is that the new Beall’s List doesn’t list IGI Global as predatory publishers but as “Vanity Press’. It defines it as “a type of publishing, where authors pay to have their work published; either in money or – more often – in the author’s publication rights. During the publication process, no peer-review is promised by the publisher and no quality control is done. Vanity press usually does no editing, and the authors are left to do all the formatting and spell-checking by themselves. Their works are then published in self-publishing outlets, such as Amazon, and physical copies of their books have outrageously high prices. The authors, of course, get no income from the sales.”
It also adds a note, stating, “this publisher is a member of COPE, which should mean they adhere to their ethical standards; please read this, this and this, and decide by yourself”.
I followed the links and found out that the primary sources behind the Vanity Press label are two blog posts from 2007 and 2008:
- https://copy-shake-paste.blogspot.com/2007/12/write-only-publications.html?fbclid=IwAR03mNvjoJnYVd-JgUYCGpA9oDk8ADcH1qsqQ4qeW2J3xD63_kl9L6j7E6w
- http://bogost.com/writing/blog/writeonly_publication/
One thing is clear; they are questioning the book publication practice that has nothing to do with the journal counterpart. Publishers like Scopus, WoS, and COPE have indexed the journal (as many other IGI Global journals). I didn’t spend a penny to get my article published in that journal as I didn’t opt for open access. The publisher did the copy editing, sent me proof before publication, and made some correction based on the author queries. It’s similar to my experience with other publishers like Springer, Nature, or Emerald. So basically, nothing on the Vanity Press definition is applicable.
But yeah, none of the facts above matters. If it’s on the blacklist, it is on the blacklist.
I tried to reach out to the anonymous author of that new Beall’s List, hoping to make them realize that as much as I believe they are helping academia avoid predatory journals, the false-positive harms some others.
Sorry for the long rant. I need to vent my frustration, and I am not sure where else to post it."
***************************************************
IGI issued a response in April 2020, but it doesn’t matter many. It is still on the new list, it doesn’t matter if predatory or vanity press; it is on the blacklist!
I often get an email invitation to Guest Edit a special issue of their journal or handbook. After seeing all these discussions on the web, I prefer not to go with them. Has anyone here published for them? It doesn’t seem to be peer-reviewed properly?
I would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks in advance!
What is InTech Open Science? A predatory or a ligitimate publisher?
Dear friends colleagues, have you ever received an invitation to publish your work at InTech Open Science (https://www.intechopen.com/)? I have recently been invited to edit a new book title for them. I am usually suspicious with such invitations and must check the authenticity of the publisher first. Interestingly, they claim that they have published the work for two recent Nobel Laureates. Therefore, I would appreciate your experience and opinions regarding InTech Open Science.
Kind regards,
Is this a new scam or something reliable?
Dear colleagues,
Today I received an email from "awards@scienceconnect.online" with the following text:
Dear Author,
Congratulations, Your recent publication has been provisionally selected for Research Awards and recommended by our scientific committee. So kindly nominate with your recent research profile/resume through an online submission system. After a few steps of profile verification and registration processes you will get your Research Award.
Selected Award Category: Best Research Award
Note: Submit your updated profile under the selected award category.
With regards,
The Award Manager,
Research Awards
An International Research Awards
ScienceFather
There was also a nomination link, which I removed from the text above and that I did not try to open, as well as the abstract of a paper that was accepted a few days ago and made available online about 10 hours before that mail was being sent. According to the website (https://sciencefather.com/awards/), one needs to pay a registration fee in order to apply for an award. Is this a new scam? Thanks for your help.
What is elivapress? A predatory or a legitimate publisher?
Dear colleagues, have you ever received an invitation to publish your work at elivapress (https://www.elivapress.com/)? I have been invited many times to publish my research works in a book for them that s why I want to make sure of their authenticity.
Related Publications
Walt Crawford, director and managing editor, PALINET leadership network, has offered his views on PoD (Publish on Demand), which is the process of publishing a book entirely through print-on-demand fulfillment. Several companies produce PoD (Publish on Demand) books with very different approaches, with most PoD companies charging significant set-up...
How has Amazon influenced publishing?
Although Amazon began identifying itself as “earth’s biggest bookstore” and pretty much only sold books for the first few years of its existence, it has clearly outgrown its roots. Nevertheless, for obvious reasons given our focus in this book,...
This first book-length analysis of Amazon's Kindle explores the platform's technological, bibliographical, and social impact on publishing.
Four Shades of Gray offers the first book-length analysis of Amazon's Kindle and its impact on publishing. Simon Peter Rowberry recounts how Amazon built the infrastructure for a new generation of digital publi...