Question
Asked 25 May 2014

Is it possible to estimate population density from line transect encounter data with no distance metric, simply frequency of encounter data?

I have several years of encounter data for spoor on a network of transects in an isolated National Park. The data do not include a distance metric (therefore the programme Distance doesn't work), but are simply record the frequency and location of encounters along a network of transects. The study species has a home range of approximately 1km2, is it possible to estimate population density from these data? Thank you!

Most recent answer

Christiaan Winterbach
Tau Consultants (Pty) Ltd
It is possible to get density estimates form tracks if you have day ranges or can estimate day ranges . See attached

All Answers (12)

Atena Eslami
Shiraz University
Do you work on animals or plants?
Niall Mccann
Cardiff University
Hi Thomas,
I have good spatial data: transect lengths, distance along transects where spoor were encountered, GPS locations for spoor encounters etc.
The study species is a tapir, so a wide-ranging large mammal with a home range of approximately 1km2. Home ranges are typically undefended, and previous studies have identified an average of +/-30% overlap of home ranges. My analyses to date have focussed on occupancy, but i'd be interested in generating density estimates and extrapolating potential population estimates from those. I have calculated frequency of encounter per km etc., but would be very interested to hear if there is a formal method for estimating population density from these data, based upon estimated home range size etc.
Thank you in advance!
Niall
Carl R. Hutter
Louisiana State University
If you could quantify your transect width you could then calculate an area (width x length) and find the densities. You might need to correct for some biases as well, so I would suggest reading the literature on those methods.
Fernando Arce
Mississippi State University
The only reasonable way that comes to my mind is to fix a width for detection (e.g. 100 m away form the transect line for both sides) and asume that detectability is perfect. Then , with that you get the area covered and the number of individuals detected and get an estimate (nº ind / area). It's not the best way but have been classically used in the past for estimating songbirds density (it is frecuently called "Finnish line-transect").
Still you can compare "densities" between transects or habitats in your study area whitout the need for explictly estimate density but detectability tipically varies between habitats so you must think about it carefully...
JJ Neiff
Center for applied Ecology (CECOAL - National Council for Scientific and Technical Research )
Hi, Niall!
I like Fernando´s comment , you have to be very careful in estimating animal density with low density ( they are widely dispersed ) , You 're wondering about the possibility of using a line- transect to measure density. This estimate is conceptually wrong, because the line obviously has no surface . However, some approximation of the density of the objects touching the line may be approximated , if these objects are very dense ( many records on the line frequency ) . But in widely scattered objects ( tapir ) this is unreliable. Keep in mind also that this transect assumes that the objects are static (as with plants).
From what I understand , the question refers to a belt transect .
You need to really know how many there tapir ? Possibly enough to know if there are many , few, or ... according to a scale of abundance, or frequency . Transect line , used to obtain frequency , not density. The latter is conceptually invalid inference.
Niall Mccann
Cardiff University
Hi All,
Thanks everyone for your comments. What seems clear is that it would be conceptually and statistically problematic to estimate absolute density from these data. I have already analysed the data with respect to occupancy and relative abundance, and given the problems expressed above I believe it is wisest to stick with those analyses rather than attempting to make any more from the data.
Thank you to all!
Niall
Fernando Arce
Mississippi State University
Also, Thinking a bit, you can use occupancy modelling but still you will have to split the transect in several sub-units but still need to define thewith of the belt. If your tapir is rare or have low density or detectability it could perform. Search for some papers about tigers and some references about using occupancy as a surrogate for rare or elusive species. You can get some feedback about it suitability for your project in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26410981_Occupancy_as_a_surrogate_for_abundance_estimation
Or in:
Conn, P. B., L. L. Bailey, and J. R. Sauer. 2004. Indexes as surrogates to abundance for low abundance species. Pages 59–74 in W. L. Thompson, editor. Sampling rare and elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA
Niall Mccann
Cardiff University
Thanks Fernando, i'll have a look at those references now. Niall
Jose Jimenez
Spanish National Research Council
I'm afraid you can't do it. As Fernando suggest, you can use a site-occupancy model to evaluate jointly the probability detection and occupancy, because is very difficult to assume the detection probability is equal to 1. I attached some interesting article & workshop material:
Niall Mccann
Cardiff University
Thanks Jose, this is what i've already done, I just wanted to rule out the possibility of also estimating density, and the hugely helpful comments here have ruled that out for me! Thanks, Niall
1 Recommendation
Christiaan Winterbach
Tau Consultants (Pty) Ltd
Hi Niall
Spoor frequency has been used to estimate large carnivore densities in areas with suitable substrate (sandy soils) to detect spoor. I attached two articles regarding the technique. In one study they had good correlation between spoor density and animal density for a variety of herbivores as well. I have been busy analyzing spoor data for surveys we have done. You need 30+ observations to get a reasonable estimate. There is a recent article by Guy Balme that combined spoor with occupancy in Kafue NP, Zambia.
You are welcome to contact me for more info.
1 Recommendation
Christiaan Winterbach
Tau Consultants (Pty) Ltd
It is possible to get density estimates form tracks if you have day ranges or can estimate day ranges . See attached

Similar questions and discussions

What post-hoc test should I use for nominal variables, after chi square test?
Question
4 answers
  • Daria BerezovskaDaria Berezovska
Hello! I would like to address the experts regarding a question about conducting a statistical analysis using only nominal variables. Specifically, I would like to compare the responses of survey participants answered the question whether they take certain medications "Yes" or "No", and analyze the data with different criteria such as education level, economic status, marital status, etc. I have conducted a Chi-squared test to determine if there is a significant difference between the variables, but now I would like to compare the answers of whether or not this medicine is taken depending on each group, for example in the education variable (higher, secondary, vocational and basic education). Is there a statistical test similar to Tukey's test that is suitable for nominal variables? I would also like to know if it is possible to create a column chart with asterisks above the columns indicating the significant differences between them based on this test for nominal variables.
I usually use Statistica StatSoft and R studio. But none of my attempts to do post-hoc for nominal variables analysis on any of them were successful. In R studio I tried pairwise.prop.test(cont_table, p.adjust.method = "bonferroni")
But I got an error:
Error in pairwise.prop.test(cont_table, p.adjust.method = "bonferroni") :
'x' must have 2 columns
I assume that this is due to the fact that I have groups in one of the variables and not two.
What should I do?
Thank you in advance for your help!
Transect methods that have proven to be valid for studying the presence of non-habituating primates?
Question
11 answers
  • Oriol ColomoOriol Colomo
Hello colleagues, in the coming months I will be investigating the presence of drills (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in an area where they have not been seen for years (Pico Basilé Natural Park, Bioko, Equatorial Guinea). It is a rainforest, with altitudes of about 1000-2000 meters. Obviously, I have considered line transect surveys, as they have been widely used for estimating abundance of primate populations. However, there are some issues to consider.
1. It is a very steep area, which will prevent me from drawing completely straight transects.
2. I will perhaps not even find the species. Therefore, as it has been done with the species in other areas, indirect evidence such as fecal remains will be sought. I also thought it appropriate to incorporate signs of human activity into the data (cartridges, rubbish,...) as bushmeat hunting is the main cause of biodiversity loss on the island.
3. I will also have trap cameras, which I intended to strategically place in front of fig trees, a key food in the diet of the species.
I am just starting in the field. I have done fieldwork before, but related to other very different taxa in a very different environment. I've been checking the literature but still, I wanted to ask you to recommend me a study that has used similar methods (nonlinear transects), or that has considered fecal remains to assess the presence of a primate species (I don't even want to say density, because I do not know or if we find them). Or maybe some other publication that explains how to propose different sampling methods according to the field conditions, how to calculate the distance between transects, etc. Or any other key issues they deem appropriate to explain to me.
Thank you so much!

Related Publications

Book
Full-text available
This open access book reviews the importance of ecological functioning within rangelands considering the complex inter-relationships of production agriculture, ecosystem services, biodiversity, and wildlife habitat.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Despite many possible applications, machine learning and computer vision approaches are very rarely utilized in biodiversity monitoring. One reason for this might be that automatic image analysis in biodiversity research often poses a unique set of challenges, some of which are not commonly found in many popular datasets. Thus, suitable image datas...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.