Question
Asked 11 December 2017

How to carry MD simulations with distance constraint between two residues?

I am using amber to do some molecular dynamics simulation, protein pockets for a long time simulation will become smaller, I want to add the distance limit between the two residues on both sides of the pocket, so that the distance between them should not be less than a certain value. Is this correct? How can I achieve this?

Most recent answer

If you want to fix two atoms with harmonic restraint: https://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial17/section2.htm
1 Recommendation

Popular answers (1)

Victor Golyshev
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Russian Academy of Sciences
You can use the restrains as in this tutorial. You just set the restraints between atoms in residues as you wish. http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial4/index.htm
4 Recommendations

All Answers (5)

Ramin Ekhteiari Salmas
King's College London
You can use SHAKE bond length constraints.
1 Recommendation
Victor Golyshev
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Russian Academy of Sciences
You can use the restrains as in this tutorial. You just set the restraints between atoms in residues as you wish. http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial4/index.htm
4 Recommendations
Hedieh Torabifard
University of Michigan
Hi,
SHAKE is usually used to consytaint the Hydrogens as they are very mobile. As Victor said, you can easily use harmonic restraint between atoms. You can find all the details in Amber manual. You need to define the atoms and the desired distance between those atoms. You can do several restraints on different atoms. You can restraint distance, angle and dihedral, too.
Good luck,
Hedi
1 Recommendation
If you want to fix two atoms with harmonic restraint: https://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial17/section2.htm
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Amber: how to apply a weak distance restraint between C-alpha atoms to push the binding partners in a homodimer in order to prevent dissociation?
Question
2 answers
  • João Pedro Fernandes QueirozJoão Pedro Fernandes Queiroz
Hello everyone,
I used HDOCK to model the homodimeric form of a protein. I want to refine the docking solutions using the protocol briefly described in the paper below:
The authors used Amber for energy minimization and MD simulation employing the GB implicit solvent model. After energy minimization and heating steps, the authors did use restraints to avoid dissociation due to possible initial sterical overlap and to improve the sterical complementarity at the interface.
I want to know which tools from AmberTools I should use to apply the following restrictions in the production run:
  • small distance restraint (force constant 0.5 kcal/mol.Angstron²) between the center of mass of ligand and receptor [in my case, the two subunits of the homodimer];
  • weak distance restraints between the C-alpha atoms at the interface of the proteins to push the binding partners toward each other (force constant 0.25 kcal/mol.Angstron²).
How to use VMD to view trajectory for Amber MD simulation?
Question
5 answers
  • Aa KkAa Kk
I created .prmtop topology and .inpcrd coordinate files in tleap, and then I ran minimization, heating, and equilibration steps, and then 10 ns of production with pmemd in AMBER 14 and created .rst and .mdcrd files for my protein-ligand complexes, I noticed when trying to view the trajectory in VMD, it looked like my complex went out of the box during some steps, and I just want to make sure I'm looking at the files correctly since I'm new to MD simulations. In VMD, I used the command "vmd complex.pdb", and then loaded the complex.prmtop file and then the complex.inpcrd file, and then the min.rst, heat.rst, and equil.rst files, and then the production.rst files for each of the 10 nanoseconds. Is this the correct way to view trajectories in VMD? What is the purpose of visualizing the trajectory for MD simulations?
When trying to load the files for one of my complexes in VMD, I noticed that my complex.inpcrd, min.rst, and equil.rst files jumped around on the screen into different positions, but after the prod.rst files, it stayed relatively in place. I also noticed that for some of my complexes, the RMSD didn't converge completely after 10 ns because there were very sharp sudden peaks in my RMSD graphs that I created with cpptraj, so I was wondering if the issue could just be my settings during the MD simulations, or if I'm selecting the wrong files to load into VMD. Should I load the .mdcrd files instead of .rst, or would there not be a difference?

Related Publications

Article
Molecular dynamics simulation of 4-n-alkyl-4'-cyanobiphenyl series (nCB) using the full-atom model was carried out. We used a force field that was fitting the dihedral angle parameter and the LJ parameters of the AMBER Force Field against nCB. The dihedral angle parameter is set to reference the quantum chemical calculation, and the LJ paramet...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.