University of Lille
Question
Asked 20 April 2016
How to accurately weigh 1 mg powder substance?
There is a powder substance in 10 mg. Since it is trace amount, how to accurately weigh 1 mg to prepare the standard solution? Any special tools or tips? I am looking forward to your reply.
Most recent answer
Thank you very much for your reply. You clarified things very well for me.
I never thought about the inability to dry the materials in my lab, but you are right about the hygroscopic issue. My salts are extremely hygroscopic so I don't think this method would be very effective in the long run by trying to dry the materials afterwards.
Thanks again for your swift reply!
Popular answers (1)
Nanyang Technological University
After one year exploring and practice, I finally found a way to weight the trace amount of organic compounds with weight around 1 mg and here the organic means the organic solvent soluble compounds. This should also work for the water soluble compounds.
1. Make sure the sample is dry enough. Usually you purchase standards from supplier and it should be dry. In case of heavy moisture effect and vapor impact, you could dissolve in methanol or acetone and then use free drying.
2. after that, cut a plastic cap from usual 2 ml tube, weight and tare the weight of cap. You should have a precise balance such as the Mettler Toledo balance with accuracy to 0.001 mg.
3. Then, use 10 ul methanol or acetone to dissolve the dry powder, dissolve the organic compound and aliquot 10 ul to the cap. Wait until the reading is stable. (I have tried the methanol and it completely vaporized in 1 hour. Methanol lost over 95% of weight in the first 10 mins and the rest part takes a bit time to vaporize.)
4. Based on the weight, you could transfer the volume of liquid to the 2 ml tube and mix well with the solvent. You could dilute further to a designed concentration as working standards.
Notes:
1.the balance should be placed in a marble table to minimize the mechanical vibration impact from other instrument. The environment around the balance should be quite without frequent pedestrians working around. For some balance, it has small cage to lock the chamber and this design would help stabilize the reading.
2. I just try the relatively volatile organic solvent. For water, I think it should work but take longer time.
9 Recommendations
All Answers (7)
Francisco de Paula Santander University
Hello dear, you can prepared a solution with a concentration higher than those that you are needing and then from this solution you can measured X volumen that it contained Y mg required for obtaining a wanted solution for example: I want to prepare 2 mL of a solution whose concentration will be 2 mg/ml (solution A) from a solution whose concentration is 10 mg/mL(solution B)
V required of solution B for preparing solution A= Va *Ca/Cb= 2 mL * 2 mg/mL/ 10 mg/mL= 0.4 mL
I measured 0.4 mL (micropipete) and the complete with water until a total volumen of 2 mL.
4 Recommendations
Nanyang Technological University
@Edwin A. Murillo, Thank you for your answer. Perhaps I did not clearly state my question. Since the standard was in the powder form with less than 10 mg, i can not get concentrated solution first and then dilute to designed concentration. Whatever, thank you for your response.
French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE)
Definetely special tools: you need special high precision scales in a temperature and humidity controlled room. A standard lab scale varies too much with environmental conditions. Or you have reliable absorbance coefficients for the compound, then you dissolve it in a known volume (precisely known volume, preferable using a well calibrated volumetric flask, and calculate the concentration from the absorbance.
2 Recommendations
Nanyang Technological University
After one year exploring and practice, I finally found a way to weight the trace amount of organic compounds with weight around 1 mg and here the organic means the organic solvent soluble compounds. This should also work for the water soluble compounds.
1. Make sure the sample is dry enough. Usually you purchase standards from supplier and it should be dry. In case of heavy moisture effect and vapor impact, you could dissolve in methanol or acetone and then use free drying.
2. after that, cut a plastic cap from usual 2 ml tube, weight and tare the weight of cap. You should have a precise balance such as the Mettler Toledo balance with accuracy to 0.001 mg.
3. Then, use 10 ul methanol or acetone to dissolve the dry powder, dissolve the organic compound and aliquot 10 ul to the cap. Wait until the reading is stable. (I have tried the methanol and it completely vaporized in 1 hour. Methanol lost over 95% of weight in the first 10 mins and the rest part takes a bit time to vaporize.)
4. Based on the weight, you could transfer the volume of liquid to the 2 ml tube and mix well with the solvent. You could dilute further to a designed concentration as working standards.
Notes:
1.the balance should be placed in a marble table to minimize the mechanical vibration impact from other instrument. The environment around the balance should be quite without frequent pedestrians working around. For some balance, it has small cage to lock the chamber and this design would help stabilize the reading.
2. I just try the relatively volatile organic solvent. For water, I think it should work but take longer time.
9 Recommendations
University of Lille
Hi Chaozhi,
I am very unfamiliar with chemistry of solutions, so please bear with me if what I am saying is illogical.
Firstly, my powders are not organic. They are things like LiF, KF, etc... Will this technique still work?
If you are using volatile solvent such as methanol, how does the balance eventually stabilize? Wouldn't it continually lose mass due to evaporation? Or does it slow enough, as you somewhat suggested, to get a good enough reading?
Please correct me if I am wrong, but the procedure to measure 1 mg of powder could be:
1) tare the balance with the plastic cap. 2) measure out 10 ul of solvent (methanol, acetone) and dissolve 1 mg of powder into it 3) you can then let the solvent evaporate and you then know you have 1 mg remaining. My question is, how do you know you are adding 1 mg of powder, if the solvent is rapidly evaporating and changing the mass from its original 10 g value?
Nanyang Technological University
I do not know whether my previously descripted method work on inorganic salt or not, but you could try by your self. For exaple, you could dissolve 1.000 g KF in 100 mL in volumetric flask and mix well and this would be 10,000 ppm (10 g/L or 1% [m/v]). Then you could transfer 100 uL (or 10 uL for fast time) the well mixed solution to the cap and record the reading from the accurate balance till the stable reading achieved. If you get stable reading, it should be 1 mg (0.1 ug for 10 uL). If not, that means the method I described is not applicable for inorganic in organic solvent.
Since I just tried the organic in solvent, i am not sure whether this method work on inorgaic compoounds or not. Some inorgnaic compounds are well known to be hygroscopic to form hydrate in which water content is very hard to remove. So similar case likely to happen with small organic solvent like methanol regard their strucutre.
NOTE: the method I described before is for the unknow weight compound or in prepraration of trace amount the chemicals for standard solution.
University of Lille
Thank you very much for your reply. You clarified things very well for me.
I never thought about the inability to dry the materials in my lab, but you are right about the hygroscopic issue. My salts are extremely hygroscopic so I don't think this method would be very effective in the long run by trying to dry the materials afterwards.
Thanks again for your swift reply!
Similar questions and discussions
How to calculate the log2 fold change?
Ganesh Ambigapathy
I have 3 groups. 1. Control 2. Disease 3. Treatment. I want to lookup the gene expression btw these groups, compared with control (whether is upregulated or downregulated).
I did real-time qPCR and have ct values. I calculated ∆Ct = Ct[Target]-Ct[Housekeeping] ... and ∆∆Ct = (∆Exp.)-(∆Control) and got the -∆∆Ct log-fold-change. It looks all the values are almost same and not much different between the groups.
My questions are,
1. What I did was right?
2.If I plot a graph what should I mention in y-axis?
3. Is there any other better way to calculate the gene expression results better?
4.How to calculate log2 fold change and does it helps to see the results more clearer?
p.s I have attached the .xls file for your reference.
Thanks in advance...!!!
Related Publications
As explained in the first two chapters, it is conventional to express the masses of molecules on the same scale as the masses of atoms. It follows that molecular weights, like atomic weights, are only relative weights* and need no units. The main importance of molecular weight lies in the information it gives about the molecular formula of a substa...
With increasing awareness and efforts on environmental protection, developing non-phosphorus and biodegradable nanopolymeric scale inhibitors for water industrial applications is becoming a hot research topic. In this work, an environment friendly nanopolymeric scale inhibitor were synthesized, characterized and evaluated as phosphorus-free green e...
With increasing awareness and efforts on environmental protection, developing non-phosphorus and biodegradable Nanopolymeric scale inhibitors for water industrial applications is becoming a hot research topic. In this work, an environment friendly nanopolymeric scale inhibitor were synthesized, characterized and evaluated as phosphorus-free green e...