Question
Asked 5th Jan, 2016

How is alpha male status achieved in Primates?

Dear all,
Before an adult male individual fights, defeats the current alpha male and achieves his alpha status. Does the challenger already have better physical performances and higher level testosterone, or he is actually an ordinary one before, but after defeating the former alpha, his testosterone level is increased, so that his performance is more masculine?  
Could you also send me the links where to get information about how alpha male status is achieved in Primates?
Thank you very much

Most recent answer

Claudia Brieva
National University of Colombia
This link is on testopsterone in alpha males and its effect on immune response, very interesting and related to your question:
1 Recommendation

All Answers (6)

Hein Van Gils
University of Twente
Dear colleague
Are you familiar with the books of Frans de Waal on chimpansies and other primates. His observations contain partial answers to your question. If you need specific references, please let me know.
Julie A. Teichroeb
University of Toronto
Hi Abdullah,
In most species, before a male would challenge another for the alpha position, he would be in equal or better physical condition, however, he can also use allies to aid in his eviction of the current alpha. Males join together in coalitions and in this way a group of smaller, lower-quality males may defeat a higher-quality alpha male. Testosterone may be similar in all of them at baseline level but will rise during challenges. It is still unclear whether in all species the male with the highest testosterone wins the battle but see Beehner et al. 2006, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:480 for an interesting case in baboons.
Yasuyuki Muroyama
Toyo University
Dear Dr  Langgeng 
The answer for your question could differ depending on the social structure of the primate species, and thus I do not know my answer would be helpful or not.  In wild Japanese macaques, two types of the changes of alpha males were mainly observed: one is a chanllenging male outside of the troop to becomes  the alpha one, and the other is that the male of the next rank becomes the alpha one.  Hormonal information may let us to be confused because in very wild natural situation, the information cannot be obtained. 
1 Recommendation
Wanda Denise Mccormick
Hartpury University
Both the points about species structure and about hormones being tricky to read are valid here.
Ray and Sapolsky (1992) identfied 3 different styles of dominance in Olive baboons which all related to low cortisol levels - although you can't say whether they had low levels before being dominant or as a result of...
1.High involvement in sexual consortships
2.High social affiliation
3.Ability to distinguish threatening from neutral interactions
The 4th type of dominance was high reactive males (who fought their way up) but they had cortisol levels equal to the subordinates.
1 Recommendation
G. S. Solanki
Mizoram University
The male achieve the dominance over the troop and enable the guard the females in a troop normally become alpha male.The level of testosterone may play a role in high sexuality however the strong physical fitness dictates the heiarchay  among  the males, that leads to alpha male position.
Claudia Brieva
National University of Colombia
This link is on testopsterone in alpha males and its effect on immune response, very interesting and related to your question:
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Did researchers enhance or diminish Koko’s (the gorilla) quality of life by granting her facility with rudimentary language?
Question
1 answer
  • Deleted profile
It has long been taken for granted that language is but a tool. Under this premise, providing Koko (the gorilla) rudimentary language skills is a gift that enhanced her quality of life. She was able to more satisfy her needs via better articulated requests.
Perhaps though, this paradigm diminishes Koko as a feeling, social animal. Having been ‘awakened’ so to speak to a greater level of conscious articulation, surely she was also made to understand her own limitations in that manner. She perceived her caretakers doing what she does (after all they communicated with her and accommodated her requests). But having perceived that it’s not that far a jump to imagine her perceiving human language elements she herself is unable to decipher (being but an ape in the end). Did she recognize the existence of higher language while being simultaneously unable to use it for communion? (Note that we humans find ourselves in that very place with regards to whales and dolphins, as well as foreign human languages. This renders the premise not so unbelievable.)
In that sense she was (possibly) rendered both frustrated and isolated. Frustrated in that she cannot decipher what her caretakers are completely about, and isolated in that she can never completely join them. By being made more than gorilla yet still less than human, was she then but a stranger in a strange land? Was her prior language ignorance indeed bliss? If so her quality of life may not have been increased but actually diminished.
I’m guessing I’m not the first to ask this, at least I hope not.

Related Publications

Article
Nonhuman primates occupy a special niche in anthropology because of the comparative insights into humans they provide. Initial anthropological interest in primates targeted the apes for their close phylogenetic relationships with humans, and the semiterrestrial Old World monkeys for their ecological similarities with hominids adapting to life on th...
Article
Full-text available
This paper looks for a bridge between human sciences and biology, which can be done reviewing ethology and anthropology. It discusses the old nature/nurture dichotomy; the other primate's behavior in their habitat, and the latest paleoanthropology registers. Finally, it seeks new ways to think about objective and subjective conceptions. KEY WORDS....
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.