Question
Asked 5th Feb, 2015

How do you measure money and liquidity in a financial market?

How do you measure money and liquidity in a financial market?

Most recent answer

15th Sep, 2015
Soumitra K Mallick
Institute for Advanced Study
If you are looking for liquidity in financial markets and its impact and by financial markets I presume you mean stock markets primarily, I have published some research which have contingent convergence properties to Arrow-Debreu type of money metric equilibrium, following stochastic Borel-Cantelli theorems dependant on interest elasticity of stock demand., dependant on interest cost of companies and dividend distributed per share indexed by specific industries or portfolios. You will find these published papers as mathematical-statistical pricing....... and testing for Pareto Optimality...... on my RG page, if you would like to take a look. SKM QC
1 Recommendation

Popular Answers (1)

5th Feb, 2015
Joanna Olbrys
Bialystok University of Technology
Direct measurement of liquidity/illiquidity, bid/ask spreads, other trading costs, etc. is difficult and even impossible as intraday trading data are not available free of charge in the case of most emerging stock markets. Given the uncertainty surrounding liquidity estimation, some liquidity/illiquidity measures are especially often advocated in the literature to provide empirical research in liquidity/illiquidity effects in emerging markets.
The popular measures of trading activity, i.e. volume, dollar trading volume, and share or market turnover, are the simplest measures of liquidity.
Lesmond et al. (1999) introduced two simple, but useful measures of illiquidity, which may be denoted as ZERO1 and ZERO2. Furthermore, Lesmond et al. (1999) developed a new liquidity estimator, known in the literature under the acronym LOT.
Amihud (2002) developed a illiquidity measure that captured daily price response associated with one dollar of trading volume.
For example, more details concerning the references are presented in my recent paper:
‘Is illiquidity risk priced? The case of the Polish medium-size emerging stock market’
Best Regards,
Joanna Olbrys
4 Recommendations

All Answers (8)

5th Feb, 2015
Joanna Olbrys
Bialystok University of Technology
Direct measurement of liquidity/illiquidity, bid/ask spreads, other trading costs, etc. is difficult and even impossible as intraday trading data are not available free of charge in the case of most emerging stock markets. Given the uncertainty surrounding liquidity estimation, some liquidity/illiquidity measures are especially often advocated in the literature to provide empirical research in liquidity/illiquidity effects in emerging markets.
The popular measures of trading activity, i.e. volume, dollar trading volume, and share or market turnover, are the simplest measures of liquidity.
Lesmond et al. (1999) introduced two simple, but useful measures of illiquidity, which may be denoted as ZERO1 and ZERO2. Furthermore, Lesmond et al. (1999) developed a new liquidity estimator, known in the literature under the acronym LOT.
Amihud (2002) developed a illiquidity measure that captured daily price response associated with one dollar of trading volume.
For example, more details concerning the references are presented in my recent paper:
‘Is illiquidity risk priced? The case of the Polish medium-size emerging stock market’
Best Regards,
Joanna Olbrys
4 Recommendations
6th Feb, 2015
Omar A Esqueda
Tarleton State University
To what my colleagues pointed out above, I will add that since you are measuring the the liquidity on the whole market, the Turnover ratio is one of the most useful liquidity measures; you must, however, use the Trading Volume (In Dollars, rather than number of shares) divided by the market capitalization of the whole stock market. Additional firm-specific measures may not be appropriate in a macro study approach.
Deleted profile
You may find the following paper by Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad to be helpful. The title is "Liquidity and Expected Returns: Lessons from Emerging Markets".  From the paper's abstract: "Our main liquidity measure is a transformation of the proportion of zero daily firm returns, averaged over the month. We find that our liquidity measures significantly predict future returns, whereas alternative measures such as turnover do not. "
1 Recommendation
11th Feb, 2015
Fábio Henrique Bittes Terra
Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
The usual measures of liquidity are the size or volume of the means of payment, which start from the monetary base, going through the more liquid financial assets (money in public power and account deposits - that is to say, money or absolute liquidity), to the more illiquid financial assets (M4 or M5, depending on development level of the economy).
Central Bank controls these variables when doing monetary policy, i. e., the public policy that deals with keeping the liquidity level in the economy.
For example, when Central Bank moves the interest rate, it is trying to change the liquidity between the means of payment and, thereby, between financial and real assets.
Can you help by adding an answer?

Similar questions and discussions

How to conduct difference in differences analysis on matched pairs after PSM?
Question
2 answers
  • Meijun LiuMeijun Liu
I have a panel data of patents from the grant year of the patent to the year that patent is traded to other entities (1,059,024 patent-year observations.). 34,375 patents exposed to a policy in year t (the exact year of each treatment patent may be different), There are 34,375 treatment patents, based on the observed characteristics of the treatment patents in t-1 year (i.e., one year before the patent is exposed to the policy), we apply 1-to-1 nearest-neighbor matching without replacement and with 0.5 caliper to estimate propensity scores on which treated and untreated patents were matched based on. Treatment observations whose propensity scores are higher than the maximum or less than the minimum propensity scores of the controls are dropped. The treatment patents that fail to be matched to a control were discarded. We end up with 11,091 unique pairs of matched patents (i.e., 11,091 treatment patents and the corresponding 11,091 control patents).
Then, I try to conduct difference in difference analysis on these matched pairs. There are 99,374 patent-year observations generated by these 11,091 pairs of matched patents. I posted my code, while it seems that I should add pair id of these matched patent pairs. But I am not sure whether I should add i.pair_id, this dummy variable to the model? Is the specification of the model correct?Thanks!
xi:logit Y post*treatment controls, or vce (cluster record)

Related Publications

Article
Latent order book models have allowed for significant progress in our understanding of price formation in financial markets. In particular they are able to reproduce a number of stylized facts, such as the square-root impact law. An important question that is raised - if one is to bring such models closer to real market data - is that of the connec...
Article
We provide an extension of the explicit solution of a mixed optimal stopping-optimal stochastic control problem introduced by Henderson and Hobson. The problem examines wether the optimal investment problem on a local martingale financial market is affected by the optimal liquidation of an independent indivisible asset. The indivisible asset proces...
Article
Full-text available
We consider a financial market with liquidity cost as in \c{C}etin, Jarrow and Protter [2004], where the supply function S{\epsilon}(s,{\nu}) depends on a parameter {\epsilon}\geq0 with S0(s,{\nu})=s corresponding to the perfect liquid situation. Using the PDE characterization of \c{C}etin, Soner and Touzi [2010], of the super-hedging cost of an op...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.