How do I add a journal to the researchgate list?

Is the psicology of learning a science? If not, you may argue some reasons.

What are the two drivers of Earth's wind systems and how does the movement of hot air at the equator and cold air at the poles produce global wind patterns?

In recent discussions on the ongoing rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies, including generative artificial intelligence and general artificial intelligence, and their rapidly growing applications, a number of both positive determinants of this development are emerging but also a number of potential risks and threats are being identified. Recently, the key risks associated with the development of artificial intelligence technologies include not only the possibility of using AI technologies by cyber criminals and in hacking activities; the use of open-access tools based on generative artificial intelligence on the Internet to create crafted texts, photos, graphics and videos and their posting on social media sites to create fake news and generate disinformation; the use of "creations" created with applications based on intelligent chatbots in the field of marketing communications; the potential threat to many jobs being replaced by AI technology but also in the development of increasingly superior generative artificial intelligence technology, which may soon be creating new, even more superior AI technologies that could escape human control. Currently, all leading technology and Internet companies are developing their intelligent chatbots and AI-based tools, including generative AI and/or general AI, which they are already making available on the Internet or will soon do so. In this way, a kind of technological arms race is currently being realized between major technology companies at the forefront of ICT, Internet and Industry 4.0/5.0 information technologies. The technological progress that is currently taking place is accelerating as part of the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 technologies. In the context of the emerging threats mentioned above, many companies, enterprises, banks are already implementing and developing certain tools, applications based on AI in order to increase the efficiency of certain processes carried out within the framework of their business, logistics, financial activities, etc. In addition, in the ongoing discussions on the possibility of applying AI technologies in aspects interpreted positively, in solving various problems of the current development of civilization, including to support ongoing scientific research, to support the development of science in various disciplines of science. Accordingly, an important area of positive applications of AI technology is the use of this technology to improve the efficiency of reliably and ethically conducted scientific research. Thus, the development of science could be supported by the implementation of AI technology into the realm of science.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I want to publish my research

Dear scientist, I am currently doing my master's thesis on metalloendopeptidases (Tc-LysN in the specific) but I have some problems with the purification. Does someone know which is the best purification pathway for a metal ion dependent protease? I have already tried to purify it with a single-step AEX chromatography but I am not quite satisfied with the results of my chromatogram. I was now thinking about going for a 2 step purification, an IEX followed by a SEC. Did someone ever purify a similar protein? If yes how?

Constructive ideas sometimes face cold receptions from insiders who have developped conceptual rigitidy and sometimes identify a theory with the thematic domain of a field, unable to see the theory as just a conceptualisation compatible and within it.

Einstein received a lot of "inertia" for his ideas like energy-mass equivalence, although he stayed comfortably within the paradigm. But others were not so lucky because they "threatened" or streched the paradigm uncomfortably to receve certain ideas that threatened some aspects or pylons of the superstructure of modern science thus possibly demanding some paradigm redefinitions if proven fruitful or powerfully illuminating

When I add my publication as a co author than that is not upload and show error again and again kindly check it