Question
Asked 9 January 2025

How can i model rainfall and flood frequency?

systematic approach on modelling rainfall and flood frequenc

All Answers (3)

Hubertus Jacobus Van Hensbergen
Wildhorus Ltd SSC Forestry Eco-Innovation Foundation
You could start by looking at the daily rainfall models developed by Zucchini and Adamson for South Africa. They are based on a first order Markov chain approach seasonally adjusted for particular sites. Using these it is possible to calculate rainfall exceedence probabilities. Then you can go on to hydrological models to get estimates of flood exceedence probabilities. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA00382353_9448 I note that these models have some difficulty with specific weather events such a extreme cut-off lows which can produce floods such as those experienced in Spain in 2024.
William J. Elliot
University of Idaho
the approach you take will depend on the scale of your study. Flood flows from Large basins are best modeled using historic flow data from gauged rivers in the region. Smaller basins can be modeled with gauged data from nearby basins, or by using rainfall data with a watershed tool. Small watersheds (under 1000 ha) are best modeled with rainfall data and runoff modeling tools. For rainfall data, if there are no nearby weather stations, I tend to get monthly rainfall depth and number of wet days from online sites, and then use an online climate generator I developed to generate a long period of record. From that record, I can determine return period rainfall events. This may not be the best method, but it works if more local data are not available. I can give you more details on my methods if you don’t get better suggestions.
Ahmed Obaid Ahmed
Ministry of water resources
Use models like HEC-RAS, SWAT, or MIKE FLOOD to simulate how rainfall translates into runoff and flooding.

Similar questions and discussions

What is the relationship between evapotranspiration and groundwater fluctuations? How does this relationship affect recharge analysis?
Question
11 answers
  • Xiaoran YinXiaoran Yin
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the relationship between evaporation and groundwater fluctuations. Does evaporation cause groundwater to fall, or does rising groundwater lead to increased evaporation?
By "evaporation," I mean actual evapotranspiration from the land surface, as defined by most evapotranspiration models (e.g., GLEAM, MERRA).
I believe this process can be described using a conceptual model:
Imagine a cup of water with green beans soaking in it, covered by a lid. When the lid is opened, water evaporates, and as the water level decreases, does the evaporation (per unit of time) also decrease? The answer is yes, indicating that groundwater (represented by the cup of water) influences evaporation.
Now, imagine the cup is topped by a sponge (representing the unsaturated zone). If we measure evaporation from the top of the sponge (which should represent actual evapotranspiration at the land surface), the evaporation will still decrease as the water in the cup (groundwater) decreases. However, there should be a time lag because groundwater evaporation reaches the sponge first.
This concept is especially relevant for soils, where soil evaporation is derived from both past groundwater evaporation and past precipitation infiltration. Similarly, for vegetation transpiration, a rising water table would lead to increased water uptake by vegetation, thereby increasing transpiration. Again, a time lag would be expected in this process.
In other words, according to this conceptual model, actual evapotranspiration at the land surface tends to lag behind groundwater evaporation.
With this in mind, is it correct that groundwater recharge analysis should subtract evapotranspiration from precipitation and then calculate recharge per unit of time? In particular, in some common response analyses, recharge is considered as the net of precipitation minus evaporation, and then the groundwater time series is fitted with a gamma function or other response functions. However, doesn't this treatment implicitly assume that higher evaporation leads to lower groundwater levels in the future?
However, shouldn't evaporation be a “sink” rather than a “source” of groundwater? Shouldn't the only components of evapotranspiration that affect recharge be vegetation indicating interception losses and soil interception?
Please let me know your answer.

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
The aim of this paper was to study the rainfall trend and investigate the implications of anthropogenic activities and rainfall for flooding at Lakota. 18 years annual rainfall data and 32 years hydrological (discharge and river stage) data of the study area were collected from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) and National Inland Water Ways (...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.