Asked 20th Feb, 2022

How can I find a list of open problems in Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations ?

How can I find a list of open problems in Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations ?

Most recent answer

César De Jesus Rodrigues
University of Minho
A list of open problrems for hpmotopy type theory is presented in HISTORIC.
1 Recommendation

All Answers (4)

Cyprien Saito
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris
Probably there does not exist such a list. My advice is for you is that you can find out by yourself such a type of problems today. The point is the localization of base change conditions in the formality of discrete topology. My suggestion concerns naturally my original researches. That is, measure theories on mixed motives. Or cercle method on mixed motives as the prolongement-localization of zeta function. See my such kind of articles and please examine the concreteness of its nouveauté.
1 Recommendation
Germán Benitez Monsalve
Federal University of Amazonas
I recommend you the following website
Germán Benitez
1 Recommendation
César De Jesus Rodrigues
University of Minho
A list of open problrems for hpmotopy type theory is presented in HISTORIC.
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Is this a new scam or something reliable?
862 answers
  • Jean-Claude GrivelJean-Claude Grivel
Dear colleagues,
Dear Author,
Congratulations, Your recent publication has been provisionally selected for Research Awards and recommended by our scientific committee. So kindly nominate with your recent research profile/resume through an online submission system. After a few steps of profile verification and registration processes you will get your Research Award.
Selected Award Category: Best Research Award Note: Submit your updated profile under the selected award category.
With regards,
The Award Manager, Research Awards An International Research Awards ScienceFather
There was also a nomination link, which I removed from the text above and that I did not try to open, as well as the abstract of a paper that was accepted a few days ago and made available online about 10 hours before that mail was being sent. According to the website (, one needs to pay a registration fee in order to apply for an award. Is this a new scam? Thanks for your help.
The significance of category theory for philosophy
219 replies
  • Thomas KrantzThomas Krantz
1) There is some tradition in philosophy of mathematics starting at the late 19th century and culminating in the crisis of foundations at the beginning of the 20th century. Names here are Zermelo, Frege, Whitehead and Russel, Cantor, Brouwer, Hilbert, Gödel, Cavaillès, and some more. At that time mathematics was already focused on itself, separated from general rationalist philosophy and epistemology, from a philosophy of the cosmos and the spirit.
2) Stepping backwards in time we have the great “rationalist” philosophers of the 17th, 18th, 19th century: Descartes, Leibniz, Malebranche, Spinoza, Hegel proposing a global view of the universe in which the subject, trying to understand his situation, is immersed.
3) Still making a big step backwards in time, we have the philosophers of the late antiquity and the beginning of our era (Greek philosophy, Neoplatonist schools, oriental philosophies). These should not be left out from our considerations.
4) Returning to the late 20th century we see inside mathematics appears the foundation (Eilenberg, Lavwere, Grothendieck, Maclane,…) of Category theory, which is in some sense a transversal theory inside mathematics. Among its basic principles are the notions of object, arrow, functor, on which then are founded adjunctions, (co-)limits, monads, and more evolved concepts.
Do you think these principles have their signification a) for science b) the rationalist philosophies we described before, and ultimately c) for more general philosophies of the cosmos?
Examples: The existence of an adjunction of two functors could have a meaning in physics e.g.. The existence of a natural numbers - object known from topos theory could have philosophical consequences. (cf. Immanuel Kant, Antinomien der reinen Vernunft).
Problems with the Formal Mathematics Project (Agda, Coq)
13 replies
  • Clarence Lewis ProtinClarence Lewis Protin
Right now, in 2022, we can read with perfect understanding mathematical articles and books
written a century ago. It is indeed remarkable how the way we do mathematics has stabilised.
The difference between the mathematics of 1922 and 2022 is small compared to that between the mathematics of 1922 and 1822.
Looking beyond classical ZFC-based mathematics, a tremendous amount of effort has been put
into formalising all areas of mathematics within the framework of program-language implementations (for instance Coq, Agda) of the univalent extension of dependent type theory (homotopy type theory).
But Coq and Agda are complex programs which depend on other programs (OCaml and Haskell) and frameworks (for instance operating systems and C libraries) to function. In the future if we have new CPU architectures then
Coq and Agda would have to be compiled again. OCaml and Haskell would have to be compiled again.
Both software and operating systems are rapidly changing and have always been so. What is here today is deprecated tomorrow.
My question is: what guarantee do we have that the huge libraries of the current formal mathematics projects in Agda, Coq or other languages will still be relevant or even "runnable" (for instance type-checkable) without having to resort to emulators and computer archaeology 10, 20, 50 or 100 years from now ?
10 years from now will Agda be backwards compatible enough to still recognise
current Agda files ?
Have there been any organised efforts to guarantee permanent backward compatibility for all future versions of Agda and Coq ? Or OCaml and Haskell ?
Perhaps the formal mathematics project should be carried out within a meta-programing language, a simpler more abstract framework (with a uniform syntax) comprehensible at once to logicians, mathematicians and programers and which can be converted automatically into the latest version of Agda or Coq ?

Related Publications

Full-text available
Working in homotopy type theory, we provide a systematic study of homotopy limits of diagrams over graphs, formalized in the Coq proof assistant. We discuss some of the challenges posed by this approach to formalizing homotopy-theoretic material. We also compare our constructions with the more classical approach to homotopy limits via fibration cat...
Full-text available
This tutorial presents the Ssreflect extension to the Coq system. This extension consists of an extension to the Coq language of script, and of a set of libraries, originating from the formal proof of the Four Color theorem. This tutorial proposes a guided tour in some of the basic libraries distributed in the Ssreflect package. It focuses on the a...
We report on our experience implementing category theory in Coq 8.5. The repository of this development can be found at This implementation most notably makes use of features, primitive projections for records and universe polymorphism that are new to Coq 8.5.
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.