Question
Asked 19th Jan, 2020

How to construct employment indicators using NSSO dataset (India)?

Hi,
I wish to calculate the weighted average of the following employment related indicators in NSSO dataset at district level:
  1. Labour force participation rate (LFPR)
  2. Worker Population Ratio (WPR)
  3. Proportion unemployed (PU)
  4. Unemployment rate (UR) Can someone please guide me on the correct approach of constructing these indicators (I am not able to understand how to use weights)?
Definition
(1)Labour force participation rate (LFPR)
{(no of employed persons +no of unemployed persons)/total population} *100
(2)Worker Population Ratio (WPR)
(no of employed persons/total population) *100
(3)Proportion unemployed (PU)
(no of unemployed persons/total population) *100
(4)Unemployment rate (UR)
{no of unemployed persons/ (no of employed persons +no of unemployed persons)}*100

All Answers (3)

23rd Jan, 2020
Goran Miladinov
Independent Researcher
You should first select a method that supports weight. Most commonly used method is weighted LS-Least Squares or TSLS. The point of the weighted Least Squares is to divide the regression model with a proportional factor (Z). In case that some of your indicators (variables) is a proportional factor than there is no need to add Z. The most popular measure for correction of heteroskedasticity is heteroskedasticity-consistent coefficient covariance. With using of the weighted LS (WLS), each of your error will be standardized according to the assumption of the OLS. Weighted LS (WLS) can be performed using inverse of the standard deviation of residuals as well. In the link below you can find an example how to calculate weighted average: https://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Weighted-Average
25th Jan, 2020
James R Knaub
Home-based research, Retired US Fed Govt
It does not look like the question has anything to do with weighted least squares (WLS) regression - my favorite topic - but rather a desire to combine employment indicators to have one, say, 'super-indicator.' But the purpose is not clear. What should it measure?
I don't think this will work out. Consider that the first indicator is the sum of the next two. I see no meaningful way of taking a weighted average here, which was the question.
11th Mar, 2020
Subash S.P
National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research
Please see codes (written in stata) below. I have written the codes for rural region (so only considered visit1).
The variables name would change, but i hope it would give some direction
** Do file for LFPR, WPR, UR
svyset status_code_ps [pweight= mult]
gen employment_status_ps =0
replace employment_status_ps =1 if status_code_ps<=51
gen employment_status_ss =0
replace employment_status_ss =1 if status_code_ss<=51
gen employment_status = 0
replace employment_status =1 if employment_status_ss ==1 | employment_status_ps ==1
svy: proportion employment_status
///employment status is WPR
svy: proportion employment_status, over( sector)
gen unemployment_ps =0
replace unemployment_ps =1 if status_code_ps==81
gen unemployment_ss =0
replace unemployment_ss =1 if status_code_ss==81
gen unemployment =0
replace unemployment =1 if unemployment_ps ==1 | unemployment_ss ==1
*** LFPR calculation
gen lfpr = 0
replace lfpr =1 if employment_status ==1 | unemployment ==1
svy: proportion lfpr, over( sector)
*** unemployment rate (this is not matching) need to check it out
svy: ratio unemployment/lfpr, over( sector)

Similar questions and discussions

Related Publications

Conference Paper
Full-text available
Education is the basic need of any citizen in the country. The education standard varies between countries to countries. According to www.usnews.com countries like United Kingdom, Canada, Switzerland, Netherlands hold the top positions in the sector of education. This article is done in the intention of comparing the education standards of United K...
Article
We examine whether or not unemployment early in an individual's career influences her later employment prospects. We use six years of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) to create pseudo-cohorts and exploit cross-cohort variation in unemployment at school-leaving age to identify this. We find heterogeneous responses: for the unskilled, there is evidence...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.