Innovation itself is not easy to measure but innovation in research, implementation and investment projects is measured instrumentally. The simplest method in the absence of advanced measurement models is the development of a scoring system based on the diagnosed determinants of innovation, for which point scales are created. In this way, innovation, i.e. a qualitative concept, acquires a quantitative dimension and can be quantified. The indicated quantitative dimension can be used to evaluate innovation as a subject of the transaction and a key factor of production in innovative startups and technology companies in which research works are carried out and new innovative technological, process, product and other solutions are created.
Thank you for your response. You highlighted the important issue of the difficulty of measuring the level of innovation. You added to our discussion an interesting concept of combining quantitative and qualitative aspects of measuring innovation.
iI did a lot of work in quantifying innovation based on remarkable ideas. After a lot of years experience I have the opinion that this never can be done seriously. If you have a market feedback when positioning your idea or product, you easily can quanitify it by the money reflow. So this is the easy answer on your question.
But coming back to your question that should be changed from my opinion to: "
"How can you quantify the innovation potential of ideas"?
First of all you need to check the potential of your idea. That's classically follows more or less the analysis of some market analysis and the outcoming trends. But be sure! The market don't know the potential of your idea !
You have to convince your sponsor or your company which have to give the money to follow up you idea. But be sure! He will know it better and never will end with his critical discusssions to explain why it does not work !
What does that mean:
In any case you need a "Greenhouse Evironment" and people or management that believes in your exceeding creativity which allows you to adapt the idea and its realization to the need of the customer in a consequent feedback process.
That's from my experience the only way to create a need in the market.
So consequently we have to ask a second questions adressed to investors and the upper managemant of companies:
"What will you do to promote the nearly endless innovation potential within your staff without using commericial criteria based on an unknowing market"
When you have results of a research before hand then you start thinking to do something better may be economically, quality wise, time technique , efficiency and effectiveness. Taking earlier research/results as baseline and putting something new and different from earlier which would be better than previous one . Then you can measure in every aspect either quality, technology, effectiveness by developing certain indicators which can calculate/show degree of percentage in improvement of new technique/innovation.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Dear Daruisz,
Some years ago I developed a metrics on innovations which looks like an standing open -- one size in Novelty, the second size is the Magnitude of Change, and the particular pages are functional areas in which innovations are applied. The text around page 83 in the enclosed document is in Russian but you can use google translation.
iI did a lot of work in quantifying innovation based on remarkable ideas. After a lot of years experience I have the opinion that this never can be done seriously. If you have a market feedback when positioning your idea or product, you easily can quanitify it by the money reflow. So this is the easy answer on your question.
But coming back to your question that should be changed from my opinion to: "
"How can you quantify the innovation potential of ideas"?
First of all you need to check the potential of your idea. That's classically follows more or less the analysis of some market analysis and the outcoming trends. But be sure! The market don't know the potential of your idea !
You have to convince your sponsor or your company which have to give the money to follow up you idea. But be sure! He will know it better and never will end with his critical discusssions to explain why it does not work !
What does that mean:
In any case you need a "Greenhouse Evironment" and people or management that believes in your exceeding creativity which allows you to adapt the idea and its realization to the need of the customer in a consequent feedback process.
That's from my experience the only way to create a need in the market.
So consequently we have to ask a second questions adressed to investors and the upper managemant of companies:
"What will you do to promote the nearly endless innovation potential within your staff without using commericial criteria based on an unknowing market"
Dear friends, I do enjoy this discussion about measuring innovation....especially the post by Igor GurkovAdded an answer.....Dear Daruisz,Some years ago I developed a metrics on innovations which looks like an standingopen -- one size in Novelty, the second size is the Magnitude of Change, and theparticular pages are functional areas in which innovations are applied. Th… Read more
ЭНСР_Гурков и др.-2013 №2&4(61&63) (1).pdf1.55 MB Unfortunately, I opened this file and found it on Russian language and can not understand it, would you please share it in English please?? Thank you so much.
In the light of the above, there were interesting considerations, answers and conclusions that may be an inspiration to continue research in this area.
It seems to me that it is good that there was a discussion in the question of this question. The answers given are very inspiring. Therefore, I am still reading the answers, following the interesting discussion.
Thank you for your answers and I encourage you to continue your discussion, to continue the interesting discussion.
'Quantitative' & 'Qualitative' measurement of 'Innovation' of a system is via 'Publications' or 'Patents' as any 'Organisation'/'Institute'/Nation potential is predicted by abovementioned parameters and no other parameters as per my understanding
Measures aimed at the number of researchers, resources, patents, articles, congresses, equipment and profitability are more correlated with financial performance. A R&D project can have its innovative result - perceived improvement in a product or process - years later, maybe even a decade. The utility may not be perceived initially, but from interactions and social and economic evolution the utility may emerge, as at this moment they are occurring with the platforms of interaction at a distance. Therefore, it is important to reconcile objective factors (more correlated with financial performance) with the procedural factors of innovation. In the latter, the individual in an organizational context develops his innovative potential under influences internal and external to the organization. There is no doubt that performance in innovation is a broad topic that crosses several fields of science.
That's right. The system for measuring the level of innovation should take into account many factors, domains, sectors and industries in which innovations arise and which determine innovation. The analytical model used to measure innovation should therefore take into account many factors.
Innovation is considered superior to inventions, so in my opinion 'Quantitative' & 'Qualitative' measurement of 'Innovation' is complicated to achieve when the researcher is focused on inventions and not on their implementation. I think that in the future, thanks to the information system that is constantly rising, this will be easier to achieve. An example would be the one based on citations in relation to scientific papers.
Thank you for your response. You highlighted the important issue of the difficulty of measuring the level of innovation. You added to our discussion an interesting concept of combining quantitative and qualitative aspects of measuring innovation.
In this chapter, we present a method for communities to continuously reproduce their identity with taking in new ideas. Communities, no matter how open or closed they may be, each have their identity that differentiates them from others. These are shared and practiced in the community implicitly in the form of spirits, visions, habits, attitudes, a...
To achieve a general agreement in relation to a specific proposal, members of a community must participate in the formal consensus
process. This paper describes a web-based system (the Vector Consensus system) for supporting an ad hoc consensus process.
The system was implemented in a collaborative innovation community with the aim to discuss how t...