Question
Asked 5 February 2014
Deleted profile

How can we reduce the several needle shots of different immunization given at the same time through recombinant technology in a single sequence

Children fear the several needles given at the same time for different immunizations and there has been failure to take immunization at appropriate times due to distance, transport, lack of logistics etc. Therefore the uptake of vaccines can be increased using a recombinant technology that combine several vaccine in a single sequence. It may increase uptake, but how can it be done?

Most recent answer

Making a single recombinant protein, comprising of antigenic epitopes of several different antigens/vaccine targets is not easily achievable. Combination vaccines made out of a compatible formulation of several different antigens is a good option to avoid giving individual vaccines and thereby multiple injections to infants.For example there are pentavalent (Diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, Whole cell pertussis, Hib polysaccharide and HepB antigen) and hexavalent (Pentavalent +Polio antigen) vaccines  available. HPV vaccines comprising recombinant L1 VLPs of more than one HPV type are also a good example.

All Answers (6)

Mehrdad Gholamzad
Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran
Hi george,
many method have been suggested for this problem.you may use multivalent vaccine.these vaccines have multiple dominant epitope from each antigen(or agent),but the most important quastion that has been responded , the pathways are that immune system by which will process that antigen. In antigen processing pathway some dominant epitope may be altered .although bioinformatic program can help for better designing ,but all the information will be theoretical.
multiple antigen encapsulation in the same nano particles may be good method.
by the way, both method are under research and should be tested in suitable model(before human usage).
which model is animal model is suitable , Rabbit or chimpanzee
Mehrdad Gholamzad
Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran
for animal study usually mice is first animal .in next step bigger animal should be used like rabbit or dog.But green monkey or resuse monkey is the best.Chimpanzees are physiologically and immunologically as like as human, but their usage in research study is very restricted.
Jeff Nelson
Evestra, Inc
I would suggest nanoparticle encapsulation and combination after the vaccines are encapsulated. I am working on a multivalent vaccine using several enzymes and proteins encapsulated. So far so good. Good luck!
Michael Nordine
University Hospital Frankfurt
This TED talk presented here by Mark Kendall, showcases a new prototype cutaneous vaccine patch
Basically this would replace the ancient needle and syringe vaccine, which Kendall says in really an inefficient way of delivering an antigen. This patch system would deliver antigens directly to the Langerhans cells embedded in the epidermis, which would then stimulate a much more effective immune response. Hope this helps.
Making a single recombinant protein, comprising of antigenic epitopes of several different antigens/vaccine targets is not easily achievable. Combination vaccines made out of a compatible formulation of several different antigens is a good option to avoid giving individual vaccines and thereby multiple injections to infants.For example there are pentavalent (Diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, Whole cell pertussis, Hib polysaccharide and HepB antigen) and hexavalent (Pentavalent +Polio antigen) vaccines  available. HPV vaccines comprising recombinant L1 VLPs of more than one HPV type are also a good example.

Similar questions and discussions

What threshold of Herd immunity is needed to control Foot and Mouth Disease in a mixed ruminant population like in India?
Question
6 answers
  • Bhoj R SinghBhoj R Singh
For a good FMD vaccine seroconversion must be >90% and it hasnot been achieved in most of states in India (http://www.pdfmd.ernet.in/index_files/Content/Reports/Annual_Report_2017_18.pdf). For successful control of FMD, herd immunity should be about the level of 60% (at least 60% animals should show the protective titre in seromonitoring (Ferrari et al., 2016. Foot and mouth disease vaccination and post-vaccination monitoring Guidelines (http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5975e.pdf) of OIE, FAO. FAO and OIE, December 2016, FAO ISBN: 978-92-5-109349-8; OIE ISBN: 978-92-95108-25-7). However, in biannual FMD vaccination, half to two-thirds of cattle would have low antibody titres after 5 months of the last round (Knight-Jones et al., 2016; www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Scientific Reports | 6:22121 | DOI: 10.1038/srep22121). Two earlier studies on FMD prevention and control stated requirement of >70 immune members in a population. Gleeson and co-workers (GLEESON, L.J., ROBERTSON, M.D., DOUGHTY, W.J., Serological Response of village cattle and buffaloes in Northern Thailand to a newly introduced trivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccine, ACIAR Proceedings No. 51 - Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Southeast Asia, 1993; 38—44) stated that in order to prevent an epidemic 70% of the population need to be protected, but to absolutely prevent an outbreak on a herd basis 95% protection is required (SOEHADJI, M., HERAWATI, S., The experience of Indonesia in the control and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease. ACIAR Proceedings No. 51 - Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Foot and Mouth Disease in Southeast Asia, 1993; 64-69).
Vaccination & herd immunity scenarios
Discussion
11 replies
  • Serge DolgikhSerge Dolgikh
As Covid-19 trajectory enters the phase of mass vaccination some early positive signs have been reported, not in the least, significant reduction in severe illness. At this stage in our view it is essential for the research and public policy community to have the necessary tools, resources and capacity to distinguish between two scenarios:
  1. Strong reduction in the prevalence of the disease (suppression scenario)
  2. Evolution of the disease to milder forms while maintaining presence in the community (concealed infection)
The capacity to understand and monitor developing epidemiological situation for these scenarios can be essential not in the least because significant presence of the infection in a community with high level of vaccination carries the risk of producing new, more resistant strains as was and is being observed with possibility to cause unanticipated "out of the blue" flare ups.
In our view, research and policy cannot and should not rely exclusively on conventional mass testing as the incentive for the wide public to participate may diminish in that phase producing skewed results. Rather, effective "non-invasive" instruments and methods of monitoring and detection should be developed and introduced for continuous monitoring of the situation. These can include ongoing and possibly automated testing of air; surfaces; sewage etc in the areas of mass aggregation such as stations, airports, shopping malls, large factories, residences etc. as well as new methods such as voluntary self-testing with easy immediate reporting in the community.

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 vaccinations have started. They will stop the pandemic. Citing recent data that are in line with immunological knowledge and predictions, combined with insights of common cold coronaviruses, we here set out the case that the maintenance of population immunity will not depend on continued vaccinations but on the endemic presence of SARS-CoV...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.