Has anyone tail-mounted GPS transmitters to large waterfowl?

Despite the explicit indications in the "Instructions for Referees/Reviewers" provided by most scientific journals, it seems that rude unprofessional answers from anonymous reviewers are more common than we wish they were. Researchers recently reported that more than half of the authors submitting scientific manuscripts to international journals receive one or more unfair unprofessional reviews. Any Editor knows that unprofessional reviews should be dismissed and the reviewer should be warned about his/her misconduct. Some Editors may even remove the unprofessional reviewers from the list of experts from which they chose reviewers. However, we all know that recruiting reviewers (a voluntary time-consuming, and mostly unrewarded job) is increasingly hard, and Editors often need to invite many experts before one accepts to review, and so Editors seem to be more and more permissive and flexible with reviewers' reports. Within this context, my question is: How would you deal with expert reviewers that send unprofessional reviews? Is there any novel (or more effective than the usual) way to discourage reviewers from sending unfair reports without discouraging experts from accepting editorial invitations to review manuscripts?

These examples should give you a good idea of what unprofessional reviews can include (while reading them, please have in mind that the "authors" are colleagues with proven expertise in their fields):

“The first author is a woman. She should be in the kitchen, not writing papers.”

“The author’s last name sounds Spanish. I didn’t read the manuscript because I’m sure it is full of bad English.”

“Obviously, the authors have no idea what they are talking about”

“…. authors should not be doing science at all.”

“… I don´t care how many papers the authors have published, it is clear to me they are unfit to do good science”

““What the authors have done is an insult to science"

“You should look closely at a career outside of science.”

"[X] tried this in the 1990s and failed and he was more creative than you".

For more details, please read these articles: