Does anyone know where I can find this rabbinical anecdote once used in explaining paraconsistent logic?

Truth has been defined by many thinkers, writers, philosophers, and individuals from various backgrounds. Each interpretation contributes to the definition of truth in its own way, sometimes clarifying the concept and, at other times, complicating it. Over the centuries, the essence of truth has been explored in existential, relativistic, absolutist, cross-cultural, and other contexts, enriching the intellectual depth of societies. I would like to discuss the nature of truth and its theoretical and practical aspects: How do you define truth based on your perspective?

PLEASE NOTE:  I AM NOT THE AUTHOR OR A CO-AUTHOR OF THIS WORK    However, I commend to you this brilliant paper by Peter Eastman, written in 2014. What's wrong with Philosophy? Nothing, but it is the post-moderne philosophers that have lost touch with the legacy of ancient wisdom, in which lies the key to the locked Self. The abandonment of the principles of epistemology, most notably Critical Thinking in modern scholarship and education, has rendered philosophers impotent to affect real metaphysical inquiry and a meaningful understanding of one's existence; one's ontological dilemma. Of course, no-one wants to discuss the bull in the China shop: the stampede to concept and fallacy reification in 21st-century academia. Or, do we? The Humanities are under attack from without, probably due to the expensive drivel and meaningless, self-serving output that Ivory Towers churn. Perhaps the answer is in the deceptive methodology (a posteriori logic), the vacuous speculations, overt manipulation and dissent ping-pong which have provided fruitful pickings for scholarly enterprise; Ivory Towers must be maintained and defended, at any cost, it seems. Perhaps pay-rolled philosophy professionals portray pointlessness purposely? You are invited to join the discussion group as one looks forward to your comments and contributions. In Xenia. JW

I am looking at kant's whole transcedental aesthetic like a film roll and film , where outer sense objects are in a film roll that like in a roll they have all the scenes of a movie simultaneously but we cant see the film at once so it must be intuited in time spontaneously .

While doing research, I often experience neutral days, but some emotional ups and downs occasionally distract my focus. Sometimes, I fall into the trap of dualistic thinking, where I feel like being emotional is a weakness. This could be problematic for analytical work, as I reckon it is a flaw that can swipe the logic away.

However, the mindset can be trained as the logic can be reclaimed with effort. Certain emotions can be helpful in moderation, but they need to be balanced.

I won't stop exploring the ways to realise this, which can be a starting point for me to be in a more rational state.

Understanding the concept of Paraconsistent Logic.

Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany: Cultural Keystone Species, Utilitarian Redundancy, Ethnobotany of The Shipibo-Konibo and Effects of Harvest on Ayahuasca.

It would mean a lot to me, if you could share it. Thank you

Life is a unique journey toward self-discovery, world awareness, transcendental quests, and universal dreams and struggles. With its metaphysical depth and chaotic yet harmonious nature, human existence is characterized as an exceptional gift, a layered mystery, a cosmic expression of joy and sorrow. Defining the essence of life is just a wave in the boundless sea of subsistence: It is an intrinsic necessity to pursue the meaning of life, to find the essence of being, and to follow the path that leads to achieving it.

Many philosophers and renowned thinkers have tried to decode the meaning of life, enriching metaphysical perceptions of essence, challenging cognitive beliefs, and fostering deep ideas. According to Aristotle, the meaning of life is expressed through happiness, while Immanuel Kant believed that happiness comes from moral duty and the pursuit of the greater good. Philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson presented his beliefs about the meaning of life through these words:

"The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well."

In your perspective, what is the meaning of life?