Do you know which time of geology has been best for formation of Cu ore deposits in east of Iran?

I want to know more about universities of world.

I want to know more about gas and oil reservoirs in Iran.

I want to know more about diamond ore deposits in Iran.

I want to know more about cu porphyry ore deposits in world.

While perusing the literature, I observed that some researchers perform NVT-NPT-Production runs to study quantum dots with classical MD. However, many studies have also examined where NVT-production runs have been carried out, and it seems that the production run is a continuation of NVT for those studies.

While discussing this topic with another researcher, I learned that for position-restrain modeling (where it continues even in the production run), there is little need to perform NPT simulation. He reasoned that semiisotropy becomes an issue with position-restraining and NPT equilibration. I am seeking a broader opinion on whether NPT is relevant for QD models or not, and why? Feel free to elaborate on this and refer me to articles that illuminate this topic. As a young researcher with classical MD and QD, I must learn from experienced people.

Thanks in advance.

P. S. I model perovskite QDs with FF like GROMOS and CHARMM.

Ideal minded researchers come up with great ideas, inspired to improve society and the environment. But unscrupulous and greedy businesses hijack these for personal gain in the name of technology-society-country, taking all for a ride. Before these go out of hand and become an all powerful force, should conscientious researchers install a self-imposed regulatory mechanism/body that ensures that science & technology are only used for the upliftment of society; strengthen it so that unethical applications of science and technology are severely obstructed and also punishable by law?

Leaving these to the public and its proxy-The Government, have not worked out in the past and always end with the perpetrators getting away with a light rap on the wrist. In the end, the public and the environment are always the sufferers. Should we self-limit self-regulate ?

The sole objective of a business in modern times is to gain profit. This is ostensibly hidden and a great show is made of benefitting society or the environment. Very few businesses exist that care about people and the environment except probably the corner traditional family run grocery store. In ancient times, the sole objective of a business was to benefit society, providing it with goods and services that are 'need-based' only, without much advertising. Modern businesses are the opposite in that they are 'want-based' and create a product/technology/service and then create a demand for it by heavy advertising. Isn't this leading all toward moral, economic and environmental bankruptcy?

One of the earliest examples of greed in business is the example of the East India Company which led to the colonization of entire countries before they could be driven out. Should this be self-regulated at the start itself so that unethical, 'want-based' businesses cannot exploit researchers, society and the environment now and in the future ?

I want to know more about Cu porphyry deposits.