Question
Asked 9 May 2025

Do I also get plasmids in my gDNA extraction?

I am analyzing WGS of some bacterial strains some of them have been reported to have plasmids, I extracted the DNA using bashing beads and spin column. I then sent those samples to sequencing and i obtained the data. Is it posible that I have sent to sequencing my gDNA and plasmids in case the bacteria had them?

Most recent answer

Pranab Roy
Institute of Child Health Calcutta
It is possible that your genomic DNA also contains plasmid. If you check the prepared gDNA by agarose gel electrophoresis and see low Mol wt. DNA by EtBr staining, you know there is plasmid DNA in the preparation.

All Answers (5)

Abhijeet Singh
Uppsala University
Do I also get plasmids in my gDNA extraction?
>> Yes.
Jonathan Jonathan
University of Surabaya
Short answer: Yes
Explanation, Spin column (silica column) basically bind DNA, pore size of the column would affect the length of the DNA you get. in case of Plasmid, no matter what you do, if the bacteria had them, plasmid would co-purified with gDNA. except you use magnetic beads with certain ratio to selectively select the length of the DNA you want to isolate (larger than the plasmid)
2 Recommendations
Naaz Abbas
PCSIR Laboratories Complex Lahore
Yes depending on size of plasmid
Marcelo Brigido
University of Brasília
The larger the plasmid, the bigger the chance to co-purify it with gDNA. Small plasmids may also appear as contamination. Therefore, it is very likely that your genomic data contains plasmid sequences
1 Recommendation
Pranab Roy
Institute of Child Health Calcutta
It is possible that your genomic DNA also contains plasmid. If you check the prepared gDNA by agarose gel electrophoresis and see low Mol wt. DNA by EtBr staining, you know there is plasmid DNA in the preparation.

Similar questions and discussions

What is the upper limit on plasmid size that can be transformed into chemically competent TOP10?
Question
17 answers
  • Aalap ParikhAalap Parikh
Hello,
I am currently working on a cloning a 6 kb insert into 14 kb vector by Gibson Assembly. Following heat shock transformation into chemically competent TOP10 cells, I had multiple positive colonies as identified by colony PCR (1 vector-specific + 1 insert-specific primer).
However, following miniprep all colonies were found to contain the original 16 kb vector (all plasmids were run on a gel as a 6 kb insert difference should be easily distinguishable from the 14 kb vector + two colonies were sequenced by whole plasmid sequencing to verify). All fragments are amplified by PCR, and I use DpnI digest + small template amounts (1 ng) to minimize template carryover. I also use a blank plate which substitutes the insert for an equal volume of water. The blank plate had only two colonies compared to 12 on the transformation plate. This cloning procedure has also worked successfully for me in the past with smaller fragments (<15 kb total construct size).
I am suspecting that the cells were unable to take up the 20 kb plasmid, and colony PCR was detecting the successful Gibson construct which was spread on the plate during transformation. I emailed ThermoFisher and they said 20 kb in TOP10 by heat shock should be fine, but I am wondering if anyone else can share their experiences. If chemically competent TOP10 is not feasible, should I think about electroporation or using an alternative strain?

Related Publications

Preprint
Full-text available
Here, we describe an adapted protocol for automated extraction of plasmid DNA from 24 E. coli cultures. It is adapted from a NIST DNA Extraction method based on the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, 27106). It results in a sample volume of 130µL of DNA. This protocol requires an automated liquid handler (Hamilton Robotics, STAR) with both 8-channe...
Poster
Full-text available
Nowadays, genome sequencing has become essential in biobanking of microorganisms. With the aim of carrying out high-throughput genomic sequencing, the purpose of this study was to show the feasibility of DNA extraction from freeze-dried and cryopreserved bacterial strains without going through a prior culture step, by comparing four extraction meth...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Extraction of DNA from Staphylococcus aureus is often difficult and less efficient. In this study, the relative recovery of extraction of staphylococcal DNA from pure culture was compared using rapid lysis, bashing beads, and commercial silica column methods. For both methicillin - resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus the DNA extracted by...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.