Question
Asked 21st Jul, 2022

Do ~300bp gene fragments melt at boiling temperatures?

Hello!
I was wondering if anyone could point me to any references that show that with increasing oligo length, there is a significant reduction in ssDNA generation efficiency. Im specifically curious at what point heating to separate dsDNA becomes ineffective and some sort of legitimate physical experiment to quantify this reduction with increasing DNA length.

Most recent answer

22nd Jul, 2022
Nikhil Goel
University of California, San Diego

All Answers (4)

21st Jul, 2022
Nikhil Goel
University of California, San Diego
For PCR to work efficiently, all DNA must be melting at 90-95C, contrary to what the equations lead us to believe
22nd Jul, 2022
Ankur Das
Gauhati University
Your question seems not clear..
However answering as per my assumptions..
1. Longer the oligo, higher the tendency of secondary structures which implies lower pcr efficiency, but minimum of 18nucleotide in recommended to maintain the specificity.
2. Your 2nd question seems irrelevant, coz gaol in to denature the template DNA which occurs preety much efficiently at 94-95 degree. There is no point increasing it to further higher
22nd Jul, 2022
Papri Basak
Indian Institute of Science Education & Research Mohali
Even genomic DNA (in MBs) denature at 95 degree, so you need to be more specific about what you are asking for!
22nd Jul, 2022
Nikhil Goel
University of California, San Diego

Similar questions and discussions

Can lack of polyA signal completely prevent protein translation in mammalian cells?
Question
4 answers
  • Jaka JanezJaka Janez
Hello everyone,
It is my understanding that polyA signal isn’t absolutely necessary for mammalian gene expression but it’s highly recommended to use it whenever possible. I’m wondering if lack of such signal can lead to the complete absence of the protein expression. The reason why I’m asking this is because I work with the construct that is used for transgenesis through recombination. On this construct I have a Tet-dependant promoter that I know works and my gene of interest downstream of it, but there is no polyA signal. After recombination of this cassette into the genome of the cells that already express rtTA and culturing in the presence of dox, I was hoping to see the expression of my gene of interest. I could indeed detect mRNA expression by qPCR (there was a significant difference between wt (non-recombined cells), -dox and +dox conditions; Cts for +dox were still relatively high though). However, when I performed IF with the antibody that I know works (it worked for the positive control) I couldn’t detect my protein. I also performed a functional test, from which it was clear that I don’t have any functional protein in the recombined cells. I sequenced the whole plasmid that I used for recombination as well DNA from the cells after recombination and the sequences seem to be completely correct. Since I can detect mRNA, I was wondering if it’s possible that my construct gets transcribed (although probably with an extensive 3’ UTR) but can’t be properly/efficiently translated due to the lack of PolyA signal. Or is there any better explanation for the absence of the protein

Related Publications

Technical Report
Life scientists can quantify nucleic acid samples on the Thermo Scientific ™ NanoDrop ™ One and One C Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometers using the preprogrammed applications for dsDNA, ssDNA, RNA, oligo DNA and oligo RNA. This technical note illustrates NanoDrop One Spectrophotometer performance across the instrument's dynamic range using dsDNA.
Article
Fundamental properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) that are individually dissolved using twenty base paired-double-stranded (ds) DNA, (dA)(20)/(dT)(20), as well as single-stranded (ss) twenty-mers of oligo DNAs, adenine (dA)(20) and thymine (dT)(20), for comparison are described. In this study, unbound oligo DNAs are fully removed fro...
Article
The technology of recombineering, in vivo genetic engineering, was initially developed in Escherichia coli and uses bacteriophage‐encoded homologous recombination proteins to efficiently recombine DNA at short homologies (35 to 50 nt). Because the technology is homology driven, genomic DNA can be modified precisely and independently of restriction...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.