University of Cambridge
Discussion
Started 23 August 2021
Discussion on Big Bang.
I conducted a experiment whose conclusions were opposite as that of Big Bang. So, based on the conclusions of my experiment I concluded that some points in Big Bang Theory are wrong...
All replies (3)
I am in agreement that the Big Bang theory is not correct:
Furthermore I think that the current ideas about the formation of the solar system need revision:
Presentation The formation of the solar system
I hope this helps.
Richard
2 Recommendations
Similar questions and discussions
Does history repeat itself exactly?
Either history does NOT EXACTLY repeat or the future is too unpredictable to risk such rationalism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377663987_Respectfully_and_Unfortunately_The_Improbability_of_and_Danger_in_Believing_in_Reincarnation
In your opinion, was Stephen Hawking a responsible Cosmologist, Physicist and Scientist?
Dear All;
If we look closely to scientific works, interviews and speeches of Stephen Hawking, we may see many points unacceptable to norms of science. I myself have identified questionable statements by him that may need to be clarified. I share you several examples:
1- As far as I have seen and read his books, I did not find any referencing styles, bibliography...
2- Strange Statements, for example about Black Holes, rejecting other sciences such as Philosophy,
3- Changing his views constantly, with no reference, talking about Big Crunch, then reject it, talking about Big Bang and then reject it.
4- Advertising "The theory of everything" and then giving it up silently...
5- Did not talk about opposite ideas by others, eg, those who don't accept Big Bang...
6- Changing his ideas about our fate constantly, for example saying we have 1000 years time to leave earth, 600 years, 200 years, 100 years...
7- The reasons he talks about for leaving the earth (such as possible nuclear wars, Viruses, climate change, ... ) could be easily challenged, as humans (if ever according to him ) leave the Earth, wont take with themselves their behavior, culture, tools, systems, policies, attitudes, understanding ideology, beliefs, systems, doctrines? just to name a few.
8- Alien invasion
9- other issues... we talk about later
- I think we as scientists, have to work in accepted norms and frameworks of science and academic research. I partially have spoken about those norms in other discussions, you might like to have a look at... for example:
- https://www.researchgate.net/post/If_the_Universe_is_Infinite_Eternal_and_Ever-Changing_as_Dialectics_since_Epicurus_insists_how_can_JWST_find_its_Limit/2
- https://www.researchgate.net/post/Cosmology_Do_we_still_need_experiments
Please share your ideas on points mentioned above, or other points you know
Thank you
Related Publications
Das von den Menschen gegenwärtig zu beobachtende Universum begann sich nach den derzeitigen Erkenntnissen der Astrophysiker vor etwa 15 bis 20 Milliarden Jahren durch eine kosmische Explosion unvorstellbaren Ausmaßes („Urknall“) zu bilden. Die ursprünglich in einem kleinen Volumen konzentrierte Materie und Energie dehnte sich mit großer Geschwindig...
We report on our latest experimental study of the ² H(ρ,γ) ³ He reaction in the energy range of interest for big-bang nucleosynthesis. The differential cross section at 135° and γ)-ray angular distributions were measured and compared with the results deduced from the latest ab-initio calculation. The astrophysical S-factor for the ² H(ρ,γ) ³ He rea...
We present detailed numerical calculations of the light element abundances synthesized in a Universe consisting of matter- and antimatter- domains, as predicted to arise in some electroweak baryogenesis scenarios. In our simulations all relevant physical effects, such as baryon-antibaryon annihilations, production of secondary particles during anni...