Can you see the similarities and differences between Pollution production markets, Pollution reduction markets, and Pollution management markets?
In a world of environmentally dirty markets, how we treat the pollution problem determines the nature of each market and its structure, which raises the question: Can you see the similarities and differences between Pollution production markets, Pollution reduction markets, and Pollution management markets?
Sharing here an article just published that some of you may find interesting in terms of foods for thoughts
Sustainability thoughts 140: How can the consequences of the 2012 green market paradigm shift avoidance move that led to the world of dwarf green markets of today be highlighted, including the green Marxism threat?
Environmental pollution is generally associated with the production or consumption of private and public goods (and services); the former are offered via markets, the latter usually by the state. The markets you mentioned are not referred to as such in environmental economics and do not seem to make sense to me either. Who intentionally produces environmental pollution (unless he is a criminal and deliberately wants to harm others). However, environmental pollution, which is also referred to as "public bad", ensures that the characteristics of goods are changed, so that in future there will be less or no environmental pollution in production and consumption - but the existing goods and service markets in particular will usually ensure this when environmental pollution is internalized through taxes and levies. Developing new terms may make sense here and there, but it should not cover up the actual problem and, above all, should not cause confusion among the students.
From inside the box, you can not see what I see, remember Thomas Kuhns remark that when there is paradigm change in the winds or soon after it happens those inside the box can not see it....
You need new terminology to show easily the short comings of the old knowledge base and point the way forward....
For starters
a) the traditional market of Adam Smith IS A POLLUTION PRODUCTION MARKET IN REALITY, but he assumed environmental externality neutrality.to pass it as a perfect market....
b) Green markets, which where avoided in 2012, are pollution reduction markets cleared by green market prices,,,,.here perfect green market thinking rules
c) The markets you described there with taxes and levies ARE ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITY MANAGEMENT MARKETS or environmental pollution management markets, which I call dwarf green markets.....Here dwarf green market thinking rules....
Do you know what the differences between green markets and dwarf green markets in terms of market structure and working are?
Many thanks for the answer. I wish you continued success in innovating new terms, which are really invigorating for discussions! But you should take a closer look at the PFRA given under "Grants and awards" on the Internet; see the contributions to the following RG discussion from 2019:
Putting together and sharing new ideas to move status quo thinking in the direction of the Thomas Kuhn's evolution loop is my personal commitment as you can see in my website True Sustainability https://truesustainability.com/THISPAGE.htm
Hans, good day. Your last comment not directly related to the question but probably inspired by my line of research and thinking that you have seen came to mind today when I came across a call for a climate change paper that is peer reviewed, but goes against climate change consensus in a clear cut manner made by respected climate change scientists. .
Scientists urge top publisher to withdraw faulty climate study
When the status quo has the tools for strong blow back as it should be expected there will be strong blow back, right or wrong, usually writing contradicting or invalidating articles or comments or as in this case a direct call to withdraw the published paper.
When the status quo is in paradigm shift mode then there is a paradigm shift induced knowledge gap, which makes blow back behavior a more difficult task as consistent with Thomas Kuhn’s ideas the status quo has difficulties seeing outside the box and I have pointed out in my papers that the knowledge base of the status quo paradigm is left behind when in paradigm shift mode.
I think now that your last comment was a message to me to be careful with what I wish with my outside the box thinking, which I respect. I have been trying to be very careful.
Let’s leave it here to stop moving away from the core of the question at hand here about these three different types of markets.
Sharing here an article just published that some of you may find interesting in terms of foods for thoughts
Sustainability thoughts 140: How can the consequences of the 2012 green market paradigm shift avoidance move that led to the world of dwarf green markets of today be highlighted, including the green Marxism threat?
Did the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic potentially increase opportunities to accelerate processes of pro-climate and pro-environmental transformation of the economy, but unfortunately these opportunities were not used?
Viene sperimenta una nuova modalità di formazione di tipo partecipato con le imprese del comparto vivaistico pistoiese, volta alla concreta diffusione di buone pratiche di gestione ambientale, inserite in linee guida e validate da un ente terzo di certificazione.
Queste linee guida potranno in futuro evolversi in un protocollo di gestione ambiental...
The science of environmental management is one of the areas of great interest in the present millennium. It deals with the whole concept of the environment, its characteristics, resources, and effective exploitation for the benefit of man. The environment offers unlimited opportunities for socio-economic development through effective exploration an...