Discussion
Started 3 January 2024

Can Pascal's Triangle multiplication algorithm be used in data flow with encryption algorithms ?

This algorithm has been devised by me in 2003. What I think is that this algorithm can be useful to evaluate testing the speed of processor of computer and furthermore, this algorithm can be used in data flow with encryption algorithms. I would love to know ideas about this subject from people who are expert in mathematics and computer science. I upload a pdf below. Thank you.

Most recent answer

Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
1 Recommendation

All replies (11)

Thank you for your comment. I had written this paper with no support. I agree with you on writing of complexity. My aim is to eliminate my mistakes by talking to people on here and I would love to make a contribution in science. Im not scientist or expert in computer science and mathematics, pursuing my Ph.D in nuclear physics and furthermore you acclaimed in your comment that"The title also means nothing", that is so keen response because making mistake and failure help you to make concrete steps for next level. Also I said that I agreed on your other statement above.
Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
Direct application of Pascal's Triangle multiplication algorithm may not be straightforward in encryption algorithms. Encryption algorithms involve a variety of mathematical operations, and the optimization techniques should be tailored to the specific requirements and characteristics of each algorithm.
This algorithm is one of the fast multiplication algorithms designed to reduce the time complexity of multiplication from the traditional O(n^2) to O(n^log2(3)), which is approximately O(n^1.585).
To elaborate further, the traditional long multiplication algorithm takes O(n^2) time to multiply two n-digit numbers because each digit in one number needs to be multiplied by each digit in the other number. Karatsuba, on the other hand, divides each of the input numbers into two halves and performs three multiplications instead of four, reducing the overall complexity.
This should be clearly stated; it shouldn't be over complex; just state this is what we have; this is what it is; and then let the reader decide; hey this is good for crypto or not.
Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
Did you want to collaborate on correcting the issue you identified in the public post there on the web address? I mean I’m fine if you want to do a quick one pager or even a five pager to correct the issue I can give you top cover as far as cryptography and quantum mechanics and quantum computing as it ships today I’m totally fine with that.
Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
Did you want to work together to put together like a five or a 10 page? Correction, I can give you top cover as a second set of eyes as far as a reviewer.
I would love to know that which field this algorithm can be applied on and If you have any recommendation you can share your thought which is utterly helpful and precious on this algorithm about where it can go Mr Brandon Alexander
Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
I will issue you a formal letter with letterhead so we can address your current findings, and I will review your paper entirely to make sure that it is up to snuff. That way you can say you have something to contribute towards your doctorate, but the only thing that I ask, is that you site The letter, and the thesis when it comes down to it 
Cankaya University Journal of Science and Engineering » Makale » Determination of Multiplication Algorithm with Basis on Pascal Triangle (dergipark.org.tr)
You can see which journal my paper has been published in when you cilick the link above. This paper has nothing to do with my Ph.D. This journal above is not famous and is not indexed in scı-e.
Brandon Alexander
American Public University System
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Will application of AI computation kill fundamental science research?
Question
44 answers
  • Emmanouil MarkoulakisEmmanouil Markoulakis
Subtitle: Will all the fundamental researchers be fired from their jobs in the future and fundamental research become obsolete?
This is a philosophical but also practical question with immediate implications to our not so far future.
The danger is that AI applications in science like AlphaFold (Nobel prize in Chemistry 2024):
are not really predictions made by science by fully and fundamentally understanding nature's physics mechanics and chemistry but just brute force smart computational pattern recognition correlating known outcomes of similar input data and guessing the most likely new outcome. This is not new fundamental science and physics research but just an application of AI computation.
The philosophical question here is, will future scientists and human civilization using AI, continue to be motivated to do fundamental science research?
Is there really any real human urge to fundamentally understand a physical phenomenon or system in order to predict its outcome results for a specific input, if the outcome results can be easily and much faster and effortlessly being empirically and statistically guessed by an AI without the need of fundamental understanding?
This is a blind and mutilated future science and future danger of slowing down real new fundamental science breakthroughs and milestones. Therefore, essentially slowing down human civilization progress and evolution and demoting science to the role of a "magic oracle".
In my opinion, the use of AI in fundamental research like fundamental new physics research must be regulated or excluded. Already many science Journals have strict rules about the use of "Generative AI" inside the submitted papers and also completely not allowing it.
What are your opinions and thoughts?
Instantaneous Coulomb gauge scalar potential infers to the existence of a superluminal 5th force?
Question
5 answers
  • Emmanouil MarkoulakisEmmanouil Markoulakis
"Using the Coulomb gauge the scalar potential changes instantaneously. That is why the man in the moon can measure the change in the scalar potential instantly."
Seems to me also demonstrated by the Aharonon-Bohm effect that potentials propagate instantly thus nonlocal or at least we could say unmeasurable superluminal many many times the speed of light c.
Giving the evidence that kinetic energy can create potential energy and vice versa therefore these gauge scalar potentials are not merely mathematical artificial man-made attributes but actually physical then
does this infer that there is possible in nature and cosmos a yet to be discovered unknown type of energy and fifth force that does not obey light information causality and we observe its effects as timeless and instantaneous?

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
Cryptographic systems are derived using units in group rings. Combinations of types of units in group rings give units not of any particular type. This includes cases of taking powers of units and products of such powers and adds the complexity of the {\em discrete logarithm} problem to the system. The method enables encryption and (error-correctin...
Article
Full-text available
The technological developments in the field of computer science has grown exponentially with the growing use of internet in open environment. The communication for various purposes has increased between two parties over internet through various applications on wide range of devices. Most of these communications are require same and encrypted usin...
Article
Full-text available
We derive algorithms for efficient secure numerical and logical operations using a recently introduced scheme for secure multi-party computation~\cite{sch15} in the semi-honest model ensuring statistical or perfect security. To derive our algorithms for trigonometric functions, we use basic mathematical laws in combination with properties of the ad...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.