Agave Storm Inc.
Discussion
Started 8 February 2025
Call for Papers Marxism & Sciences no. 8 (Vol. 4, issue 2)
-Call for Papers-
Marxism & Sciences: A Journal of Nature, Culture, Human and Society
Issue 8
Summer 2025
Marxism and Systems Science - The Technosphere: Systems, Things, and Infrastructures From Tektology, Cybernetics and Computational Planning to the Complexity Paradigm and Platform Capitalism
Issue Editors: Sascha Freyberg, Joost Kircz & Örsan Şenalp
Deadline for abstracts: March 1
Deadline for finished articles: June 1
Issue publication: September 2025
Marxist thought and practice have always centrally focused on the analysis of systems, things, and (technological) infrastructures—along with the possibilities inherent in alternative systems organized by collective ownership and state planning. These discussions have gained renewed currency in the digital age. To explore these questions today means to elaborate a Marxist epistemology of systems that goes beyond the old dichotomy of historical vs. structural analysis.
In this special issue, we want to investigate the relation of Marxism and systems science, in history, theory and practice. We construe systems science broadly, with a particular emphasis on those conceptions which developed in the Marxist tradition with a dialectical approach. Additionally, we understand there to be a longstanding relationship between systems theory, political economy, organisation, computational means, theories of economic planning, and global social history, represented by traditions such as Immanuel Wallerstein’s world systems theory.
In recent years, world systems analysis has been recast in light of the debate around the notion of the Anthropocene. Representative is the work of the geologist Jan Zalasiewicz, who has argued we should understand the artefacts of human planetary activity as comprising the Technosphere. As Zalasiewicz writes, “The technosphere encompasses all of the technological objects manufactured by humans, but that is only part of it…. [It] comprises not just our machines, but us humans too, and the professional and social systems by which we interact with technology…. A proto-technosphere of some kind has been present throughout human history, but for much of this time, it took the form of isolated, scattered patches that were of little planetary significance. It has now become a globally interconnected system – a new and important development on our planet.”
This debate provides an occasion to revisit Marxist resources for understanding human labour in connection with the “scientific-technological revolution” and the “great acceleration” of the twentieth century. We can consider key moments in history, from the famous Bogdanov-Lenin debate to the anti-technocratic work of Evald Ilyenkov, the systems theory of Blauberg, Sadovsky, and Yudin, and cybernetics in the socialist realm.
In the special issue we would like to address the following questions: Is system science more than a theory of an administered world? Does it go beyond an effort to improve the status quo and transform the system altogether? What role does systems theory play in Marxist thought and the history of socialism more generally? What epistemological changes are presented by the development of technologies such as AI? Are current developments reducible to old questions about statistics and data, or do they contain novel dynamics?
Additionally, we might ask: what were the contexts informing the development of Marxist systems theories? Which problems do we encounter today when pursuing these perspectives, and how successful were syntheses of the Marxian critique of political economy and systems thinking? What are its prospects today, and where are revisions needed?
Also, Is it significant that the first two versions of systems science, developed by prominent Marxist theorists Bogdanov and Bukharin, were suppressed by the Soviet regime and only reemerged in the post-war US context?
Given the broad topic, we are looking for contributions from different fields and perspectives, including historical and analytical methods, and systematic and speculative approaches alike. We particularly welcome contributions that give a comprehensive overview of a specific field, case study, or problem.
Possible topics may include:
Revisiting Bogdanov’s work and its reception
Cybernetics in socialist planning in view of computation (e.g. in Chile, DDR, USSR, China, etc.)
Marxist analyses of systems (e.g., trade, money, the internet)
Marxist systems theories (World systems theory, the Regulation School, etc.)
Materialist dialectics and systems theory
Hegel, Marx and Engels as precursors of the systems paradigm
The problem of inherent positivism in techno-futurist ideas
Dialectics of nature and earth-systems science
The Technosphere and the debate about the Capitalocene
Marxist epistemology of systems and infrastructure
Capitalist appropriation of systems sciences (neo-liberalism, neo-institutionalism, Governance theory, Club of Rome, RAND, etc.)
Cybernetics in socialist planning and computation
The rise of complexity science in the neoliberal era (Manhattan Project, Santa Fe Institute, etc.)
Marxist (and post-Marxist) critics of systems sciences and complexity governance
Digital infrastructures and platform capitalism
Proposals
Please send abstracts of your proposal with max. 300 words to marxismandscience@gmail.com
Select Bibliography:
Biggart, J., Dudley, P., & King, F. (Eds.). (1998). Alexander Bogdanov and the origins of systems thinking in Russia. Ashgate.
Blauberg, I. V., Sadovsky, M. V., & Yudin, E. G. (1977). Systems theory: Philosophical and methodological problems. Progress Publishers.
Bogdanov, A.A. Red Star: The First Bolshevik Utopia. (1908). Edited by Loren R. Graham and Richard Stites. Indiana University Press 1984.
Bogdanov, A., and Peter Dudley (1996). Bogdanov’s Tektology. Hull: Centre for Systems Studies; and: Bogdanov, A. (1980) Essays in Tektology, George Gorelik(trs), The systems inquiry series.
Gare, Arran (2000). Aleksandr Bogdanov’s history, sociology and philosophy of science. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 31,2: 231 -248. See also the praise by C. Rovelli (2023). Relational interpretation of quantum mechanics and Alexander Bogdanov’s worldview. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40(2), 312–319.
Ilyenkov, E.: Leninism and the Metaphysics of Positivism Online: https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/positive/positii.htm.
Lenin (1908) Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy. Vol. 14. Collected Works. Progress Publishers, 1968.
Susiluoto, I. (1982). The origins and development of system thinking in the Soviet Union. Political and philosophical controversies from Bogdanov and Bukharin to present-day re-evaluations, Phd thesis, Helsinki: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae Dissrtationes Humanurum Litterarum 30, Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia
Wallerstein, I. (1974-1989) The Modern World-System, 3 vols; and idem. (2004) World Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Online: https://archive.org/details/worldsystemsanal0000wall
Zalasiewicz, Jan. “The Unbearable Burden of the Technosphere.” The Unesco Courier. March 27, 2018. Online: https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/unbearable-burden-technosphere
All replies (3)
As is well known, early communism was religious. And the founder of communism: Thomas More. Chancellor of England and Catholic saint.
How do More and Marx relate? Who is more modern? I have a positive attitude towards the Marxist style of analyzing social phenomena.
So let's apply Marx's approach to the collision in the fashionable sphere of so-called "artificial intelligence". Elementary estimates show that the memory capacity that will fit a recording of the structure of the human brain (0.63 quadrillion synapses) if we encode a synaptic connection by assigning 8 bytes to a synapse, we get 5.04 quadrillion bytes, or 5040 terabytes. For comparison: the entire human genome is 3.3 gigabytes. In total, recording brain synapses requires 1.53 million genomes.
This provides grounds for the reincarnation of an ancient idea. That at the conception of a person: additional information begins to come from nobody knows here. However, our topic: Marxist analysis of the situation that has arisen.
Not a single politician, and not a single religious figure: does not urgently went to tell children at school that the brain does not fit into the genome. And Marx comes to the rescue. Explaining together with Engels that if necessary: the government will change the geometric axioms.
In this case: the indicated discrepancy leads to the hypothesis that there is something like an "additional file", quite immortal. And the basis of a person is exactly there.
And this can reduce the fear of death and other earthly troubles. Such a person is more difficult to control.
The situation that has arisen: perhaps not new. It seems that early Christians believed in multiple reincarnations. But at the moment when Christianity became the state religion: this was cancelled.
By the way, from the point of view of Marxism: there should be many imitations of Marxism, for the purpose of state control.
Agave Storm Inc.
One of the traditional forms of class struggle is the strike.
Three main types of strikes are known in history:
1. The British strike. No one shows up for work. Not a very effective form.
2. The Italian strike. Everyone is at work, but no one works. More effective.
3. The Chinese strike. Everyone is at work, and follows all the boss's ideas exactly.
Agave Storm Inc.
The main ANSWER of modern economics.
We have many computers now. The question arises. Why does no one use centralized economic planning. Not even for illustration. Not even trying to follow it.
Real Marxism gives the answer. In order to plan, your glorious bosses need to explain their goals.
Similar questions and discussions
Which autonomous communities should be disbanded as a priority? The Gaza Strip, or New York
Victor Okhonin
I will note right away that I do not support the political and ideological line of the Hamaz leadership. In my opinion, they would have won with a more peaceful behaviour. According to some facts. But we will not talk about politics, but about lifestyle. In 2007, we calculated the ratings of the biological success of countries (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283748924_The_Purposes_of_the_ProjectsRus). An Israeli citizen is also among the authors. So. USA: this is 67th place in biological well-being of the population. Not a bad result. And who took first place? First place is the Gaza Strip. In particular: at that time, life expectancy there was 14 years higher than in Russia and Ukraine, and the birth rate was 4.5 times higher. Ukraine was ranked 213th, and Russia 214th.
If you are determined to liquidate the Gaza Strip: then as reasonable people, taking into account the biological catastrophe of the "civilized world": you must not lose valuable specialists. Residents of the Gaza Strip: bearers of unique skills in the correct arrangement of life. Their place is at least in the New York City Hall.
[Call for paper]IEEE 2025 8th International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (ICAACE 2025) | Shanghai, China
Kiuling Lai
IEEE 2025 8th International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (ICAACE 2025) will be held on March 21-23, 2025 in Shanghai, China.
Conference Website: https://ais.cn/u/EbARNf
---Call For Papers---
The topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:
1. Algorithms
Analysis of algorithms
Approximation algorithm
Computability theory
Evolutionary algorithm
Genetic algorithm
......
2. Control Engineering
Multivariable Control
Nonlinear Control
Robust Control
Adaptive and Optimal Control
Intelligent Control
......
3. Technologies & Application of AI
Basic Theory and Application of Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge Science and Knowledge Engineering
Machine Learning and Data Mining
Machine Perception and Virtual Reality
Natural Language Processing and Understanding
......
4. Robotics and Automation
Automation, CNC Machines & Robotics
Autonomous Robotic Vehicles
Evolutionary Robotics
Industrial Robotics
Intelligent Control Systems
......
---Publication---
All papers, both invited and contributed, the accepted papers, will be published and submitted for inclusion into IEEE Xplore subject to meeting IEEE Xplore’s scope and quality requirements, and also submitted to EI Compendex and Scopus for indexing. All conference proceedings paper can not be less than 4 pages.
---Important Dates---
Full Paper Submission Date: February 15, 2025
Registration Deadline: February 21, 2025
Final Paper Submission Date: February 21, 2025
Conference Dates: March 21-23, 2025
--- Paper Submission---
Please send the full paper(word+pdf) to Submission System:
Marxism & Sciences: A Journal of Nature, Culture, Human and Society, vol. 3, issue 2
Siyaves Azeri
The full issue of volume 3, issue 2 of the journal Marxism & Sciences is now available. The dossier of the issue is "Centennial of Evald Ilyenkov II: Ilyenkov in Practice" with issue editor being Corinna Lotz and Kyrill Potapov.
M&S is a fully open-access journal. The full issue can be accessed at https://marxismandsciences.org/volume-3-issue-2/
Related Publications
This book covers the fundamentals of leadership and managing in a changing environment that is characterized with Disruption and artificial intelligence. Disruption in this context is beyond that of technology so includes trade wars, social media, presidential tweets, Trump, Brexit, climate change and a host of others. The book explores how these e...