Any suggestions for charting the afterlife? Why?

Herbert Dingle's argument is as follows (1950):

According to the theory, if you have two exactly similar clocks, A and B, and one is moving with respect to the other, they must work at different rates,i.e. one works more slowly than the other. But the theory also requires that you cannot distinguish which clock is the 'moving' one; it is equally true to say that A rests while B moves and that B rests while A moves. The question therefore arises: how does one determine, 3 consistently with the theory, which clock works the more slowly? Unless the question is answerable, the theory unavoidably requires that A works more slowly than B and B more slowly than A - which it requires no super- intelligence to see is impossible. Now, clearly, a theory that requires an impossibility cannot be true, and scientific integrity requires, therefore, either that the question just posed shall be answered, or else that the theory shall be acknowledged to be false.

According to our theory for new new physics, beyond current physics, dimensionless cosmological constant, constant lambda of Einstein, should be considered as a new calculation constant which could replace certain long mathematical theories which are adopted to find values of the constants of physics.

The expression Catch 22 is from the novel of that name by Joseph Heller:

" ... a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions."

The escape from a dilemma condemned the victim to the dilemma.

I wonder if that applies to dark energy.

(1) Current conventional cosmological paradigms leave problems answered. Examples: dark energy, The cosmological constant problem, Steven Weinberg Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 – Published 1 January 1989, the cosmological horizon. Current conventional cosmological paradigms are incomplete and some may be wrong.

(2) Any proposed solution of dark energy must conform to current cosmological paradigms.

If trying to solve dark energy is a catch-22, solving it is going to take a while.

Your views?

All the best to all ________________ John-Erik