University of Iowa
Question
Asked 10 October 2013
Alum vs. ferric chloride?
Coagulation process is important in water treatment. It is a common understanding that alum is more efficient and cheaper as compared to ferric chloride. I have used these two coagulants for the treatment of Flour Mill Wastewater. Ferric Chloride is way more superior than alum. Then why do we persist with alum?
All Answers (3)
I agree that ferric works as well or better than most other coagulants. It also seems to form a "heavy" floc that settles nicely. My experience is that it is pretty cheap. But it can depress alkalinity, if that is a concern. I also think alum might work a little better in cold water.
2 Recommendations
Similar questions and discussions
Related Publications
The conference paper is discussing various techniques of waste water treatment for tanneries which processing wet-blue material. Steps of cleaner production management and alternative solutions of end-of-pipe techniques are presented
This comprehensive textbook highlights the fundamental concepts and design principles related to water and wastewater engineering. Problems and issues arising from the lack of sustainable conventional treatment practices and potential methods for resolving problems are discussed in detail. The book starts with an introduction to water resources and...