Question
Asked 4th Oct, 2020

A Cosmology based on a Chaos-borne Hubble Law ?

A Cosmology based on a Chaos-borne Hubble Law
Otto E. Rossler
Division of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tubingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076 Tübingen, F.R.G.
Abstract
A recent classical-mechanical finding, Fermi deceleration, implies a classical Hubble-like law. While its exact size is still open, it is bound to co-determine empirical reality. Some old and new questions concerning the size and the age of the cosmos arise. The current enigma of early old galaxies supports the prediction of a potentially much larger and older cosmos. So does Riccardo Giacconi's finding of ultra-high-redshift x-ray point sources.
(October 8, 2004)
Recently, a classical-mechanics based Hubble-like law was described [1,2]: Light rays
negotiating galactic clusters that are in random motion with up to 1 percent the speed of light (as is realistic) suffer a distance-proportional redshift through "Fermi deceleration." The latter phenomenon was discovered by Loskutov et al. [3] on a chaotic billiard: A fast-moving, low-mass billiard that is subject to random grazing-type collisions with slowly moving high­mass boundaries suffers a distance-proportional loss of momentum called Fermi deceleration [3]. The repelling grazing-type boundaries of Loskutov et al. can be replaced by attracting high-mass point centers - with the same grazing-type interactional effect. The slow attracting centers may be galaxies or clusters of galaxies and the billiard may be a light ray. The size of the effect depends on the density, mass and speed of the attracting centers.
The size of the effect appears to be neither too large nor too small to accomodate the empirical Hubble law [1]. If this preliminary result is taken as a cue, the implied lack of cosmic expansion re-opens the age-old question of the size of the cosmos. Fortunately, perhaps, a general-relativistic size limitation remains in charge if the mass density in the cosmos is uniform. In this case, not too much is changed compared to the standard paradigm: The cosmos can still be a pulsatile cosmos, for example, albeit so on a longer time scale.
If the assumption of a uniform mass density is dropped, on the other hand, the general­
relativistic bound is no longer finite. This stationary solution to the original Einstein equations was discovered by Benoit Mandelbrot [4], a fact which is not very well known. If the fractal dimensionality of the mass distribution is assumed to be unity (so that twice as large a radius contains not eight times but only twice as much mass - as in an ultra-light hole­ ridden Swiss cheese), the Schwarzschild radius which limits the size of the cosmos becomes infinite. For twice as much mass by definition has twice-as-large a Schwarzschild radius (and so on), so that no finite limit is reached in the present case. An exactly 1-D Mandelbrot cosmos is both stationary and unbounded. Peebles almost immediately found that the empirical fractal dimensionality of galaxies is about 1.2 up to large distances [5]. This and subsequent data can be re-evaluated by dropping the original assumption of a progressive lack of volume as the remaining distance to the primordial fireball shrinks toward zero. The validity of Peebles' near-unity result will thereby be extended to covering the greater part of the visible universe.
If this prediction is correct, a "Brunian cosmos" (in honor of Giordano Bruno) of potentially unbounded extension in both space and time becomes an option again- But would not the other "pillars of the big bang" automatically preclude so far-reaching a conclusion? Surprisingly, this is not the case. The cosmic background radiation -- the strongest ally -- would assume the role of "mean cosmic temperature" in the sense of Assis [6]. The also observed large-scale fluctuations in the WMAP would reflect a giant honeycomb structure that lies beyond the range of current telescopes (although some infrared and x-ray sources may already be pointing the way). The three other major pillars - primordial nucleosynthesis, inflation and accelerated expansion - would have to wait in line until the gross features have been straightened out. The third (large-distance dimming) may, by the way, prove reducible to Peebles' little-known (1+z)--4 formula [7], cf. [8].
But how about the riddles newly imported by a modern Brunian cosmos? First, in the absence of a far-from-equilibrium big bang, the persistent far-from-equilibrium state of the observable universe becomes incomprehensible. A gravitational effect partially anticipated by Einstein in 1912 [9] may possibly solve the mystery: Any particle in rectilinear motion inside a Newtonian (or Einsteinian) void enjoys a forward acceleration [10], cf. [11]. If this is so, gravitational energy gets "recycled" into kinetic energy in a Carnot-like manner. The same mechanism, by the way, could explain - jointly with Hawking radiation [12] - the second major new riddle that arises: the empirical "non-devouredness" of almost all matter by age-old black holes.
The main asset of a classical explanation of cosmological redshift, when held against the backdrop of the standard model, seems to lie in the fact that it introduces no hypotheses. lt only uses facts that are implicit in classical (post-Newtonian) mechanics and special and general relativity anyhow. lts predictions are irrefutable once their size has been correctly determined. What is surprising is only how many accepted hypotheses suddenly lose their hard-won plausibility.
Nevertheless it would be nice to have direct evidence as well. Very faint distant x-ray point sources appear to possess redshifts in excess of 30. This is because, on the one hand, the sensitivity ofx-ray telescopes is presently 1000 times greater than that of light telescopes [13]
- so that they can look 30 times (squareroot of 1000) deeper into space in principle - and, on the other, x-ray point sources continue to pop up at the lowest brightnesses [13]. This empirically suggested, two-tiered conclusion is incompatible with the big bang scenario (which leaves no room for redshifts beyond about 10 for massive objects). lt is about tobe decided by direct redshi:ft measurements in progress [13]. A hard - if weaker - fact is the recent optical discovery of strongly redshifted old galaxies 12 billion light years away, which has put cosmology into a full-fledged crisis [14,15]. While almost any way out appears acceptable at the time being, the above explanatory scenario was arrived at independently.
To conclude, the classical-mechanical finding of Fermi deceleration has upset the decades­ old belief that only a relativistic mechanism can account for the Rubble law. By coincidence, an empirical crisis holds cosmology in its grip in which fiddling with the usual culprits (like the star formation rate in young galaxies) seems insufficient to rescue the big bang model. In
,.:;uch a situation, even an at first sight alien, chaos-borne ray of light can acquire a warm glow.
Acknowledgments
I thank Christophe Letellier, Heinrich Kuypers, Dieter Fröhlich, Normann Kleiner, Peter Weibel, Erwin Wendling, Hans Diebner and Florian Grond for discussions. For J.O.R.
References
[1] O.E. Rossler, D. Fröhlich and N. Kleiner, Time-symmetric Hubble-like law: Light rays grazing randomly moving galaxies show distance-proportional redshift. Z. Naturforsch. 58 . 807-809 (2003).
[2] O.E. Rossler, Cosmic shear's temporal fluctuations generate a distance-proportional redshift in both time directions: Minibang theory. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 12, 1335- 1338 (2004).
[3] A. Loskutov, A.B. Ryabov and L.G Akinshin, Analysis of billiards with time-dependent boundaries. Facta Universitatis Series Mechanics, Automatic Control and Robotics 11, 99- 116 (2001).
[4] B.B. Mandelbrot, CR. Acad. Sci. Paris A 280, 618 (1975).
[5] M. Seldner and P.J.E. Peebles, Astrophysical J 215, 703 (1977).
[6] A.K.T. Assis, "Relational Mechamics." Montreal: Apeiron 1999.
[7] P.J.E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology. Princeton University Press 1993, p. 226.
[8] O.E. Rossler, "Darkness intensified: Existence of a nonlinear threshold in redshift­ induced dimming." Z. Naturforsch. 54, 453-454 (1999).
[9] A. Einstein, Does there exist a gravitational effect analogous to electrodynamic induction?
"Collected Papers," English Translation edition, Vol. 4, pp. 126-129. Princeton University
Press 1996.
[10] O.E. Rossler, A morphogenetic instability in gravitation. Physica D 2004 (invited paper submitted).
[11] The term "Fermi acceleration" was already reserved by Loskutov et al. [3] for a different mechanism (the heating-up of billiards subject to repetitive head-on collisions with moving boundaries). Thus, a new term (“Einstein acceleration”?) will be needed for the present mechanism which has nothing to do with billiards and, by the way, does not extend to light, provided it is going to be confirmed.
[12] S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 33, 323 (1973).
[13] R. Giacconi, Kepler lecture, held at the University of Tübingen, July 2003.
[14] J.-M. Bonnet-Bidaud, Le big bang face à ses contradictions, Ciel&espace No. 412, 42- 44, September 2004.
[15] Editorial: Mature galaxies in young universe at odds with theory, Scientific American online, September 2004.
Remark added in 2020: Since this paper was written in 2004, Cryodynamics – explaining cosmology causally for good – got discovered; so this text remains just a step on the road.

Most recent answer

Otto E. Rossler
University of Tuebingen
Thank you, Marcos,
Otto

All Answers (4)

Siva Prasad Kodukula
Independent Researcher
Dear Dr. Rossler,
My Answer for the above question is-
No. Chaos is not because of Hubble's Law.
The chaos is because of 'General Relativity'.
Two of my works may be helpful in answering above question.
1. "Dark Energy is a Phenomenal Effect of the Expanding Universe-Possibility for Experimental Verification".July 2020,DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-40479/v2
2. Theoretical Value of Hubble's constant is a Salient Feature of Experimental Results-New Insight in to Origin of Universe,September 2020, DOI:10.20944/preprints202009.0452.v1
1 Recommendation
Bahram Kalhor
Shahid Beheshti University
Otto E. Rossler
University of Tuebingen
Dark energy and expansion are figments of the imagination.
Newton said "hypotheses non fingo."
Otto E. Rossler
University of Tuebingen
Thank you, Marcos,
Otto

Similar questions and discussions

What might the continued development of civilisation look like on colonised exoplanets millions of light years away?
Discussion
10 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
In your opinion, could a civilisation built within the framework of full sustainability with the surrounding biosphere emerge on certain colonised exoplanets millions of light years distant? built within the framework of the full realisation of the objectives of balanced development, within the framework of a sustainable, pro-environmental, green closed-circuit economy, in which the process of global warming would not have occurred, no global climate catastrophe would have occurred in a relatively short period of time, i.e. within just a few centuries of the emergence of the first technological and industrial revolutions in civilisation, if such revolutions had occurred? Would it be possible for a civilisation to emerge on an exoplanet in this way that would not destroy the climate and biosphere of the exoplanet?
On the other hand, over a much longer period of time, what could the continuation of the evolution of the homo sapiens species look like over the next thousands and millions of years on colonised exoplanets millions of light years away?
In your opinion, how could the evolution of homo sapiens continue over the next thousands and millions of years if the Earth's civilisation survived for at least another 100 years and man succeeded in colonising exoplanets? What do you think the evolution of homo sapiens would have looked like over the next thousands and millions of years if Earth's civilisation had survived for at least another 100 years and man had managed to build spaceships that would have enabled the colonisation of many exoplanets similar to Planet Earth, millions of light years away?
For example, if man succeeded in building spaceships which would allow the colonisation of many exoplanets similar to the Earth, distant by millions of light years, and after colonising at least several hundred exoplanets, after a period of at least several thousand years man would survive on some of these exoplanets and build certain civilisations which would be significantly different from the one we know. After a period of at least several thousand years, it would turn out that only on every hundredth or every thousandth exoplanet would a new civilisation be built and a new human race already evolved, which would survive specific natural cataclysms and/or climatic and other catastrophes resulting from human activity. A large number of colonised exoplanets similar to the Earth, but nevertheless significantly different from each other, e.g. in terms of the composition of elements on the equivalent Mendeleyev tables, the structure of key organic compounds, the composition of the biosphere, the climate, etc., would correspond, for example, to different islands on the planet Earth, on which different species of flora and fauna arose in a process of Darwinian evolution lasting millions of years. In the context of such considerations, the following question arises: What qualities could a human being have, whose civilisation would survive for many thousands of years to come on a small number of colonised exoplanets similar to the planet Earth, distant by millions of light years? What qualities could a human being have, whose civilisation would survive many thousands of consecutive years, i.e. would develop in a fully balanced way with the surrounding nature functioning on a specific exoplanet similar to the planet Earth and would avoid the negative scenario that awaits the planet Earth in the 21st century, namely would avoid degradation of the biosphere occurring on the exoplanet, would avoid global warming and climate catastrophe? In my opinion, it would probably have been human beings who would have built a civilisation on the basis of sustainability with the surrounding nature, and intelligent people, as a result of the evolutionary process operating in a slightly different than earthly environment on distant exoplanets, would not have developed negative characteristics such as e.g. Greed, egoism, thoughtless exploitation of the planet's resources within the framework of a selfish robbery economy, ignorance of the relationship between man and the natural environment surrounding man, ignorance of the negative development of civilisation causing great damage to the surrounding biosphere and climate, i.e. features which have decided that the development of civilisation and the technological progress which has taken place on planet Earth in the 21st century has not protected man, the biosphere and the planet's climate from destruction.
For example, if man succeeded in building spaceships which would allow the colonisation of many exoplanets similar to the Earth, distant by millions of light years, and after colonising at least several hundred exoplanets, after a period of at least several thousand years man would survive on some of these exoplanets and build certain civilisations which would be significantly different from the one we know. After a period of at least several thousand years, it would turn out that only on every hundredth or every thousandth exoplanet would a new civilisation be built and a new human race already evolved, which would survive specific natural cataclysms and/or climatic and other catastrophes resulting from human activity. A large number of colonised exoplanets similar to the Earth, but nevertheless significantly different from each other, e.g. in terms of the composition of elements on the equivalent Mendeleyev tables, the structure of key organic compounds, the composition of the biosphere, the climate, etc., would correspond, for example, to different islands on the planet Earth, on which different species of flora and fauna arose in a process of Darwinian evolution lasting millions of years. In the context of such considerations, the following question arises: What qualities could a human being have, whose civilisation would survive for many thousands of years to come on a small number of colonised exoplanets similar to the planet Earth, distant by millions of light years? What qualities could a human being have, whose civilisation would survive many thousands of consecutive years, i.e. would develop in a fully balanced way with the surrounding nature functioning on a specific exoplanet similar to the planet Earth and would avoid the negative scenario that awaits the planet Earth in the 21st century, namely would avoid degradation of the biosphere occurring on the exoplanet, would avoid global warming and climate catastrophe? In my opinion, it would probably have been human beings who would have built a civilisation on the basis of sustainability with the surrounding nature, and intelligent people, as a result of the evolutionary process operating in a slightly different than earthly environment on distant exoplanets, would not have developed negative characteristics such as e.g. Greed, egoism, thoughtless exploitation of the planet's resources within the framework of a selfish robbery economy, ignorance of the relationship between man and the natural environment surrounding man, ignorance of the negative development of civilisation causing great damage to the surrounding biosphere and climate, i.e. features which have decided that the development of civilisation and the technological progress which has taken place on planet Earth in the 21st century has not protected man, the biosphere and the planet's climate from destruction. Of course, in this issue, considerations around the following further question arise: On these other, distant but also similar to the planet Earth, would man develop civilisation in a similar way as it has done on the planet Earth and also a process of global warming and climate catastrophe would occur, i.e. on these other exoplanets the appearance of man could be compared to the appearance of a virus in a certain balanced environment, which would seriously disrupt this state of sustainability and lead to a catastrophe of the exoplanet's biosphere? Such comparisons have been used more than once in popular science literature and in films of the science fiction genre, including, for example, part 1 of the 'Matrix' trilogy directed by the Wachowski brothers. However, we are not able to answer the latter question fully unequivocally, because we do not know the geological, climatic, natural environments, the biochemical composition and organic compounds forming the biosphere of the exoplanet, the composition and structure of the elements forming the dominant minerals on the planet, etc. of those other many hundreds, thousands or perhaps more exoplanets similar to the planet Earth. Thus, we do not know these presumably different in many respects biotic and abiotic environments of exoplanets and therefore do not know how these other environments would have shaped the development of other civilisations that may have been man-made on distant exoplanets. Alternatively, we can describe a hypothetical situation that could exist on some human-colonised exoplanets by defining the aforementioned conditions existing on an exoplanet of other animate and inanimate nature that could determine the development of human civilisation taking place in harmony with the surrounding nature and climate, i.e. within the framework of full sustainability, i.e. also in a way that we currently define on planet Earth as fully pursuing the goals of sustainable development and conducted within the framework of a sustainable, pro-environmental, green circular economy. Until we know more about these other abiotic and biotic environments found on many exoplanets and whether other, different forms of life exist on many other exoplanets, the answer to the above questions can only end at the stage of conjecture and theoretical considerations.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
What, in your opinion, could the continuation of the evolution of the species homo sapiens look like in the period of the next thousands and millions of years, if the Earth's civilization survived for min. What do you think the evolution of homo sapiens would look like over the next thousands and millions of years, if the Earth's civilisation survived for at least another 100 years and man managed to build spaceships that would enable the colonisation of many exoplanets similar to the Earth, millions of light years away?
On the other hand, over a much longer period of time, what could the continuation of the evolution of the homo sapiens species look like over the next thousands and millions of years on colonised exoplanets millions of light years distant?
In your opinion, on certain colonised exoplanets millions of light years distant, would it be possible, under certain, different, biotic and abiotic conditions found on certain exoplanets, to have a civilisation built within the framework of full sustainability with the surrounding biosphere, built within the framework of full realisation of the goals of sustainable development, within the framework of a sustainable, pro-environmental, green closed-circuit economy, in which the process of global warming would not occur, no global climate catastrophe would occur within a relatively short period of time, i.e. within just a few centuries of the emergence of the first technological and industrial revolutions in civilisation, if such revolutions had occurred? Would it be possible for a civilisation to emerge on an exoplanet in this way that would not destroy the climate and biosphere of the exoplanet?
What could the continuation of the development of civilisation on colonised exoplanets millions of light years away look like?
What do you think?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to the discussion of scientific issues and not the ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Warm regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Psych.: w/ many permutations of many diverse "things": the only way to provide a general alternative better view will be a full-fledged paradigm shift
Discussion
5 replies
  • Brad JesnessBrad Jesness
With so many permutations of so many diverse "things": the only way to provide a general alternative better view AND APPROACH will be WITH a full-fledged paradigm shift:
What is offered must have a host of better characteristics and better ways, all related clearly to a better empiricism. [ SPECIFICALLY: I am speaking of/for PSYCHOLOGY -- the number of characters allowed in a title didn't allow for the inclusion of that full phrase (though the same type of thing may at times be required by other sciences) .]
A full-fledged PARADIGM CHANGE: Better assumptions; stricter & very established/agreeable and actual empiricism, well-defined, with a definition true for ALL sciences; better KEY BEHAVIORAL foundations/clear grounding (in terms of: behavior patterns) for all cognitive processes; clear NEW observations sought (i.e. major discoveries sought) VIA NEW observation methods; & with clear better-empirical verifiable/falsifiable HYPOTHESES . This is what I seek to offer with :
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Human-Ethology-and-Development-Ethogram-Theory-A-Full-Fledged-Paradigm-Shift-for-PSYCHOLOGY (see its major References and the Project Log (Updates) for this Project; the major References, hundreds of pages long, will provide you with a perspective and approach -- a "how-to" FOR all of that. Given its better empiricism, a concrete basis is also provided for General Artificial Intelligence -- all that is found and seen can be "mechanized", is programmable.)
[ This all is VERY serious "business"; it really is an all-or-nothing proposition. If you see major problems with large portions of Psychology throughout its history, you better "go with" what I present; otherwise the long-standing situation WILL remain the same; I think you may well be able to imagine how and why that could be true (all the various myths of how things [otherwise] could/will come together NOT WITHSTANDING -- these are true myths, not based on any empiricism). ]
Is the planned space manned expedition to Mars a result of the rivalry between economic powers or their cooperation?
Discussion
17 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
From the announcements of politicians, it appears that in a few years manned expeditions to the Moon will resume. On the Earth's moon, bases will be established for the preparation of a man's expedition to Mars, which may already be carried out in a dozen or so years. Manned expeditions to Mars in the perspective of a dozen or so years have already announced the US and China.
So there is a rivalry in the field of who will first make a manned trip to Mars. Will it be a similar competition as in the 1970s between the US and the USSR in the area of ​​the then competing programs of the planned and implemented manned expedition to the Moon.
Or maybe a manned expedition to Mars will not be a competition between the biggest economic and technological powers of the world? Perhaps these planned further cosmic manned expeditions will be international expeditions, will be implemented as part of international cooperation and co-operation, and the crew of cosmonauts will be a crew composed of representatives of various countries?
What is your opinion on this matter? Should a manned space expedition to Mars be conducted as part of the international competition between competing countries or rather as part of international cooperation and cooperation?
Do you agree with me on the above matter?
In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:
Is the planned space manned expedition to Mars a result of the rivalry between economic powers or their cooperation?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
With the James Webb Telescope, will we learn the answer to age-old questions about extraterrestrial life forms?
Discussion
1 reply
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
With the James Webb Telescope, will we learn the answer to age-old questions about the existence of extraterrestrial life forms, other life forms, intelligent other living beings, other civilisations operating on exoplanets billions of light years away, located in other planetary systems, in other constellations, other stellar constellations, located in other galaxies, galactic nebulae, etc.?
For centuries, man has been searching for an answer to the question of whether life originated and developed only on planet Earth, or whether it originated beyond Earth and came to Earth, e.g. whether life originated and developed only on planet Earth, whether it originated beyond Earth and came to Earth, e.g. in the form of simple microorganisms in the rocks of meteorites falling to Earth, whether it also developed in many other places in the Universe, whether life also developed, used to function and/or still functions, whether other forms of life developed, whether other intelligent life forms developed, whether these other intelligent life forms have created other civilisations on other exoplanets many millions of light years distant, located in other planetary systems, in other constellations, other star constellations, located in other galaxies, galactic nebulae, etc.? ? For several decades now, as man has been building ever more perfect space telescopes and listening for sounds from distant corners of the Universe, the possibilities of answering these questions have been gradually increasing. On the one hand, cosmologists, astronomers, researchers into astrophysics, the biosphere of the cosmos, etc., are trying to estimate the number of exoplanets which are at a similar distance from their suns as the planet Earth, have a sufficiently abundant amount of various elements and chemical compounds, and have the potential for the emergence of at least simple forms of life. On the other hand, it has still not been possible to hear a sound from space that would be evidence of the existence of another civilisation. It has still not been possible to photograph exoplanets millions of light years away in such a way, with sufficiently close-ups in the photographs, that traces of other life forms can be seen. But technological advances in the possibilities of space exploration and research are continuing relentlessly. Recently, the most advanced space telescope to date, called the James Webb telescope, was placed in Earth's orbit. The James Webb Telescope is currently the most perfect device ever created by man to photograph distant cosmic objects, distant galaxies, constellations, planetary systems and also exoplanets, millions and billions of light years away. This telescope is superior to the previously used Hubble Telescope for infrared observations. The James Webb Space Telescope was built between 2007 and 2021 a space telescope for observing and taking pictures of distant space objects mainly in the infrared. In a sense (observing the Cosmos only in the infrared range), the James Webb Space Telescope is intended to be the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope. Overseen and largely funded by NASA, the project was developed in collaboration with ESA and the CSA. With the James Webb Telescope, it is possible to photograph and study exoplanets located in other planetary systems, in other constellations and to photograph distant galaxies up to 13 billion light years away from Earth. As a result, the James Webb Telescope is already being described as a kind of cosmic time machine, as it takes pictures of galaxies billions of light years away, the photographed image of which shows these galaxies as they looked those billions of years ago. The James Webb Space Telescope was placed into Earth's orbit at the end of 2021, and to date has photographed many cosmic objects that were previously virtually invisible to humans in any way. The date for the launch of this telescope has been postponed several times since 2007, because due to the global financial crisis of 2008 and other economic issues, there was not enough money to complete the project in the previous years before 2021. The cost of building the James Webb Space Telescope was estimated to be around USD 10 billion. In view of the above, the James Webb Space Telescope is the most powerful telescope ever built by man to be placed in Earth's orbit and the most perfect device for taking photographs of space objects billions of light years away. Perhaps, thanks to the James Webb telescope, man will finally get an answer to the above questions.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
With the James Webb Telescope, will we learn the answer to the age-old questions regarding the existence of extraterrestrial life forms, other life forms, intelligent other living beings, other civilizations operating on exoplanets billions of light years away, located in other planetary systems, in other constellations, other stellar constellations, located in other galaxies, galactic nebulae, etc.?
What do you think?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Kindly let me know your thoughts on my abstraction of Cosmic essence E, what you all think?
Question
8 answers
  • Haque Mobassir Imtiyazul Haque ShaikhHaque Mobassir Imtiyazul Haque Shaikh
“The Essence of ‘E’: Unveiling the Infinitely Infinite” for your consideration. Enclosed, you will find a comprehensive exploration into the enigmatic concept of “E,” a cosmic force that transcends the boundaries of finite and infinite existence.
This manuscript represents a labor of passion and dedication, offering a unique perspective on the role of “E” in the universe. From its profound cosmic order to its paradoxical nature of being both infinitesimal and infinitely powerful, this work delves deep into the heart of a concept that defies human comprehension.
The content is structured meticulously, with an abstract that provides a concise overview of the manuscript’s scope, an engaging introduction that draws the reader into the subject matter, and detailed sections that explore the mass of “E” and the cataclysmic events it undergoes. The manuscript concludes with a thought-provoking summary of our journey into the infinitely infinite.
I believe this manuscript would make a valuable addition to [Company/Organization Name]’s collection of publications, given its unique perspective and the depth of research invested in it. It has the potential to appeal to a wide audience interested in cosmology, astrophysics, and the mysteries of the universe.
I would be delighted to discuss any further steps or provide additional information as needed. I eagerly await your response
Would learning about other forms of life on distant exoplanets help answer the question about the nature of the existence of life in the Universe?
Discussion
7 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
Would learning about other life forms on distant exoplanets make it easier to answer the question regarding the possible purposefulness or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe?
Would the knowledge of other forms of life on distant exoplanets make it easier to answer the question of the possible purposefulness or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe and its development in evolutionary processes lasting millions or billions of years?
Man has been searching for years for a clear answer to the questions concerning the nature and possible purposefulness or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe and its development in evolutionary processes lasting millions or billions of years. On the other hand, one of the highly debatable issues is the possibility of the existence of other life forms, including other intelligent life forms on exoplanets many millions of light years distant, located in other planetary systems, other constellations, other stellar constellations, in other galaxies. At present, the most perfect instrument for photographing cosmic objects millions or even billions of light years away that man has built so far is the James Webb Space Telescope. Perhaps with the help of this telescope it will be possible to take photographs of distant exoplanets similar to our planet Earth, which exist in other planetary systems at distances from suns that allow life to originate and develop in the form of evolution on them. If man ever manages in this way to unambiguously confirm the existence of other forms of life on distant exoplanets, then, taking into account the number of galaxies in the known Universe numbering in the billions, the potential number of exoplanets with other forms of life on them can then also be estimated in relatively large numbers. If this is the case, then the question of resolving the possible intentionality or randomness of the emergence, or in fact the multiple and independent emergence of life on many exoplanets many millions of light years distant from each other in the known Universe will also significantly change its interpretative character. In view of the above, an affirmative and unambiguous answer to the question regarding the possible intentionality or randomness of the multiple and independent from each other origin of life on various exoplanets that are many millions of light years distant from each other, i.e. in a situation of unambiguous confirmation of the existence of other forms of life on distant exoplanets, the question of the possible expediency or randomness of the multiple emergence of life in the Universe and its development in processes of evolution of various forms of life lasting millions or billions of years repeatedly, and perhaps also the independent, multiple emergence of intelligent forms of life and of the more or less technologically advanced civilisations built by these various intelligent forms of life should be greatly facilitated. Perhaps with the finest telescope yet built, i.e. the James Webb Space Telescope, it will be possible to photograph exoplanets millions of light years away and obtain evidence of the existence of other life forms on these distant exoplanets similar to our planet Earth. And when this has been achieved, then perhaps the answer to the other questions above will already be facilitated.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Would the knowledge of other forms of life on distant exoplanets facilitate the answer to the question concerning the possible expediency or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe and its development in evolutionary processes lasting millions or billions of years?
What is your opinion on the subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
What if it were scientifically confirmed that there are other intelligent life forms in the Universe?
Discussion
1 reply
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
What if it were scientifically confirmed that there are other life forms in the Universe on distant exoplanets, including other intelligent life forms?
What if it were scientifically confirmed that in the Universe there are thousands of exoplanets similar to our planet Earth other exoplanets many millions of light years away where other life forms exist, including other intelligent life forms would this change your understanding of the essence of humanity and the role, importance of man in the Universe, the desirability of his existence, the possible desirability of the process of evolution of life, etc.?
Just as centuries ago, the change from a geocentric to a heliocentric system of planetary and solar bodies in the system now known as the solar system was fundamental to the understanding of the role of man in the Universe, etc.? Yes in the future, when it is scientifically confirmed that in the Universe there are thousands of other exoplanets similar to our planet Earth, many millions of light years distant, on which there are other forms of life, including intelligent life forms this will also probably prove to be a breakthrough in the understanding of the essence of humanity and the role, importance of man in the Universe, the purposefulness of his existence, the possible purposefulness of the process of evolution of life, etc.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
If it were scientifically confirmed that in the Universe there are thousands of exoplanets similar to our planet Earth, other exoplanets many millions of light years distant, on which there are other life forms, including other intelligent life forms, would this change your understanding of the essence of humanity and the role, importance of man in the Universe, the desirability of his existence, the possible desirability of the process of evolution of life, etc.?
What if it were scientifically confirmed that there are other life forms in the Universe on distant exoplanets, including other intelligent life forms?
And what is your opinion on this subject?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Related Publications

Article
Human knowledge about the cosmos is rapidly increasing as instruments and simulations are generating new data supporting the formation of theory and understanding of the vastness and complexity of the universe. OpenSpace is a software system that takes on the mission of providing an integrated view of all these sources of data and supports interact...
Article
Scientific progress entails instabilities that advance a field; but excessive instability, often arising from misunderstandings, thwarts planning and adds cost. The history of 20th century astronomy provides insight on several factors that make astronomy and astrophysics exceptionally unstable. A fundamental source of instability is astronomy’s ina...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.