Objectives: Aggressive driving behavior can lead to potential traffic collision risks, and abnormal weather conditions can exacerbate this behavior. This study aims to develop recognition models for aggressive driving under various climate conditions, addressing the challenge of collecting sufficient data in abnormal weather. Methods: Driving data was collected in a virtual environment using a driving simulator under both normal and abnormal weather conditions. A model was trained on data from normal weather (source domain) and then transferred to foggy and rainy weather conditions (target domains) for retraining and fine-tuning. The K-means algorithm clustered driving behavior instances into three styles: aggressive, normal, and cautious. These clusters were used as labels for each instance in training a CNN model. The pre-trained CNN model was then transferred and fine-tuned for abnormal weather conditions. Results: The transferred models showed improved recognition performance, achieving an accuracy score of 0.81 in both foggy and rainy weather conditions. This surpassed the non-transferred models' accuracy scores of 0.72 and 0.69, respectively. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the significant application value of transfer learning in recognizing aggressive driving behaviors with limited data. It also highlights the feasibility of using this approach to address the challenges of driving behavior recognition under abnormal weather conditions.

Traffic accidents are likely to occur on sharp curves under poor driving conditions, and the severity level of such accidents is high. Therefore, predicting the risk associated with driving on curved roadways in real time can effectively improve driving safety. This paper aims to develop a dynamic real-time method that fuses multiple data sources to predict risk when driving on sharp curves in the context of the connected vehicle environment. Six curves with three small radii (60 m, 100 m, 150 m) and two driving directions (left and right) were designed for a driving simulation experiment. Driver maneuvering data, vehicle kinematic data, and physiological data of 55 drivers were collected for this study. The data were combined and spatially and dynamically segmented. The mean value of the critical lateral acceleration of the vehicle was set as the risk assessment index. K-means clustering was used to classify the driving risk into three levels: low, medium, and high. Then, the risk level was predicted using the maneuvering data, vehicle kinematic data, and physiological data as well as road alignment characteristics as input features for the proposed model that employs the long short-term memory (LSTM) network algorithm. Models with different combinations of observation window (lookback) and interval window (delay) were compared to derive the best window combination. The algorithms selected for comparison against the LSTM algorithm are random forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The results show that the proposed LSTM-based method can effectively predict dangerous driving behavior on sharp curves. The optimal window combination derived using the LSTM algorithm is lookback = 20 m and delay = 20 m. The prediction performance of the proposed model is significantly better than that of the other three compared algorithms, with F1-scores of 84.8% and 86.0% for the medium and high risk categories, respectively. In addition, the proposed LSTM-based model that fuses multiple data sources is proven to outperform the model that uses only vehicle kinematics data. The dynamic prediction method proposed in this paper can contribute to the development of a real-time prediction and warning system for driving risks at vehicle terminals in the intelligent connected vehicle environment.

As a product of the shared economy, online car-hailing platforms can be used effectively to help maximize resources and alleviate traffic congestion. The driver’s behavior is characterized by his or her driving style and plays an important role in traffic safety. This paper proposes a novel framework to classify driving styles (defined as aggressive, normal, and cautious) based on online car-hailing data to investigate the distinct characteristics of drivers when performing various driving tasks (defined as cruising, ride requests, and drop-off) and undergoing certain maneuvers (defined as turning, acceleration, and deceleration). The proposed model is constructed based on the detection and classification of driving maneuvers using a threshold-based endpoint detection approach, principal component analysis, and k-means clustering. The driving styles that the driver exhibits for the different driving tasks are compared and analyzed based on the classified maneuvers. The empirical results for Nanjing, China demonstrate that the proposed framework can detect driving maneuvers and classify driving styles accurately. Moreover, according to this framework, driving tasks lead to variations in driving style, and the variations in driving style during the different driving tasks differ significantly for turning, acceleration, and deceleration maneuvers.

Aggressive driving is common across the world. While most aggressive driving is conscious, some aggressive driving behavior may be unconscious on part of motor vehicle drivers. Perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior is one of the main causes of traffic accidents. This paper focuses on identifying impact factors related to aggressive driving perceptual bias. Questionnaire data from 690 drivers, collected from a drivers’ retraining course administered by the Traffic Management Bureau in Nanjing, China, were used to collect drivers’ socioeconomic characteristics, personality traits, and external environment data. Actual penalty points were considered as an objective indicator and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was used to cluster an objective indicator into different levels. The driving anger expression (DAX) was used to measure drivers’ self-assessment of aggressive driving behavior and then to identify perceptual biases. Then a binary logistic model was estimated to explore the influence of different factors on drivers’ perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior. Results showed that bus drivers were less likely to have perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior. Truck drivers, drivers with an extraversion characteristic, and drivers who have dissatisfaction with road infrastructure and actual work were likely to have a perceptual bias. The findings are potentially beneficial for proposing targeted countermeasures to identify dangerous drivers and improve drivers’ safety awareness.