Lab
Research Group on Social Responses to Complex Trauma
Institution: McGill University
About the lab
The research group on social responses to complex trauma (SR/CT) seeks to better understand the impact of adverse and traumatic life events in the lives of children and youth, as well as their experiences with services. The group aims to promote and implement social responses which are better suited to meet the needs of these marginalized children and youth and their families. Our mission is realized through research and collaborations across three axes:
(1) Trauma-informed care implemented in different settings, such as health and social services centres (youth protection), correctional services, and schools;
(2) Children's rights-based approaches, through community social pediatrics centres;
(3) Best practices in the identification and responses to child sexual abuse.
(1) Trauma-informed care implemented in different settings, such as health and social services centres (youth protection), correctional services, and schools;
(2) Children's rights-based approaches, through community social pediatrics centres;
(3) Best practices in the identification and responses to child sexual abuse.
Featured research (15)
Introduction
Multiple risk and protective factors influence the wellbeing and retention of child protective and youth justice professionals. Less attention has been given to empirically understand how residential childcare workers (RCW) experience these factors. A sense of pride and of achievement may be related to competence and satisfaction, which have been identified as protective factors against staff turnover.
Methods
Responses to the Secure Base Interview Protocol question “What aspects of caring for (name of child in their care) have given you the greatest sense of pride or achievement?” were extracted from individual interview transcripts from Canadian RCW and analyzed using the Interpretive Description methodology. Themes were aggregated using the thematic analysis technique to create descriptions of RCW pride and achievement.
Results
The RCW identified many experiences of work-related pride and achievement while caring for children and youth. These positive experiences were described to occur contingent on the level of mutuality and trust in the helping relationship shared between the RCW and child or youth in their care.
Discussion
The reciprocal nature of the relationships described by RCW that gave rise to their felt sense of pride and accomplishment is a novel finding. Future work is indicated to better understand how protective factors related to RCW wellbeing may indeed be relationally constructed and dependent.
L’épuisement professionnel, les traumatismes et la détresse du personnel des centres de réadaptation (CR) sont rapportés dans de nombreuses études (Brend, 2020 ; Kim et Kao, 2014 ; McElvaney et Tatlow- Golden, 2016 ; Seti, 2008). De nombreuses recherches ont permis d’identifier des facteurs de risque et de protection liés à ces problèmes (Edmonds, 2019 ; Molnar et Fraser, 2020 ; Russ et al., 2019 ; Sage et al., 2018 ; Salloum et al., 2019). Toutefois, peu de recherches ont
examiné le point de vue des éducateurs concernant ce qu’ils vivent au quotidien.
This Viewpoint aims to question the value of compliance-oriented programs’ principles as they apply to traumatized children and youth.
Background:
Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) contributes to depression in several populations. However, there is a significant lack of longitudinal research on depressive symptoms among sexually abused adolescents involved in Child Protection Services (CPS). Given the systemic challenges in CPS research, it is also unclear as to whether depressive symptoms vary according to CSA severity.
Objective:
The research aimed to determine whether depressive symptoms increased over time and to assess whether CSA severity predicted the variation of change in depressive symptoms over time.
Participants and setting:
The study included 135 sexually abused adolescents (M = 16.01, 71.9 % female) from the Maltreatment and Adolescent Pathways (MAP) Longitudinal Study who were involved in three densely populated urban CPS agencies in Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
The project involved the collection of self-report questionnaires to be completed every six-months for three years. The questionnaires encompassed measures on psychological outcomes, selected resiliency factors, and abuse and neglect history. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) via mixed model analyses were used to estimate depressive symptom trajectories.
Results:
We found that depressive symptoms significantly reduced over time (β. = -3.62, p < .001). Furthermore, the results showed that CSA severity significantly predicted depressive symptoms over time (β = 0.19, p < .001).
Conclusions:
The findings contrast previous longitudinal research in community-based samples, suggesting a different trajectory for depressive symptoms among sexually abused adolescents involved in CPS. Moreover, the results reveal a strong association between depressive symptoms and CSA severity, further supporting early mental health screening practices.
Epidemiological surveys measuring the prevalence of child maltreatment generate essential knowledge that is required to enhance human rights, promote gender equality, and reduce child abuse and neglect and its effects. Yet, evidence suggests Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) may assess the risk of these studies using higher than normal thresholds, based on a perception they may cause high distress to participants. It is essential for IRBs and researchers to have an accurate understanding of the nature and extent of participant distress associated with these studies, and of the duties of researchers towards survey participants, so that meritorious research is endorsed and duties to participants discharged. Assessment by IRBs of the ethics of such research must be appropriately informed by scientific evidence, ethical principles, and legal requirements. This article adds to knowledge by considering participant distress in child maltreatment surveys and its appropriate ethical and operational treatment. We provide an updated overview of scientific evidence of the frequency and severity of distress in studies of child maltreatment, a review of ethical requirements including a focus on beneficence and participant welfare, and a new analysis of researchers' legal duties towards participants. Our analyses demonstrate that participant distress is infrequent and transitory, that researchers can satisfy ethical requirements towards participants, and that legal liability does not extend to emotional distress. Informed by these bodies of knowledge, we distill key principles of good epidemiological practice to provide solutions to operational requirements in these surveys, which both fulfill ethical requirements to participants, and demonstrate trauma-informed practice.
Lab head

Department
- Centre for Research on Children and Families (CRCF)
About Delphine Collin-Vézina
- Dr. Delphine Collin-Vézina is the Director of the Centre for Research on Children and Families at McGill University and the Director of the Canadian Consortium on Child & Youth Trauma. She is a licensed clinical psychologist and a Professor at the McGill School of Social Work. She is also an Associate Member in the Department of Pediatrics where she holds the Nicolas Steinmetz and Gilles Julien Chair in Community Social Pediatrics.
Members (14)
Katrina Cherney
Mathilde Turcotte
Heather MacIntosh
Claudia Mitchel
Rosée Bruneau-Bherer

Irene R Beeman

Ashley Alexandra Lowenthal

Jacqui Liljequist