Lab

Psycholinguistic Laboratory, CLUL, University of Lisbon


About the lab

Psycholinguistic Laboratory of CLUL (Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa), University of Lisbon

Featured research (2)

Research shows that as toddlers grow and their vocabulary expands, their ability to recognize a referent after hearing its name worsens when they encounter similar-sounding words (e.g., dog-door) or words from the same category (e.g., dog-chicken) compared to unrelated words (e.g., dog-boat). This study investigated the impact of phonological and semantic similarities between words on spoken word recognition in toddlers. We presented 21-month-old English monolinguals with a Preferential Looking Task adapted to a priming paradigm while their eye movements were recorded with an eye-tracker. Participants were presented with a spoken word (prime) followed by a related or unrelated spoken word (target). The experiment included three conditions: Phonologically Related, where words share the initial phonemes (e.g., toe-toast); Semantically Related, where words share the initial phonemes and belong to the same category (e.g., turkey-turtle); and Unrelated, where words do not share the initial phonemes and do not belong to the same category (e.g., bubble-toast and box-turtle). Growth curve analyses revealed more target looks in the Unrelated condition than in the Phonologically Related condition and more looks in the Semantically Related condition than in the Unrelated and Phonologically Related conditions. These results suggest better word recognition when a word is both phonologically and semantically related than when it is unrelated or only phonologically related. Female toddlers demonstrated more pronounced word recognition than male toddlers. This study extends our understanding of the roles of phonological and semantic cues, as well as sex differences, in language processing among young toddlers.
In the present study, we test whether, during reflexive pronoun resolution, structural cues guide both the language processing system and its underlying memory-based mechanisms or whether the latter might be influenced by non-structural cues as well. Specifically, we explore the inhibitory effects caused by similarity-based interference, which may lead to disruption during reading, reflected in slower reading times and lower accuracy rates. We contrast conditions in which two referents, the reflexive antecedent, and a distractor, are of the same or different gender in sentences with a gender-unmarked reflexive, a gender-marked reinforcement reflexive form, or both. The different types of reflexive constructions allow us to tease apart encoding and retrieval interference since while encoding interference is expected both with gender-marked and gender-unmarked reflexives, retrieval interference is only expected with gender-marked reflexives. In two self-paced reading experiments, one in European Portuguese (EP) and one in Brazilian Portuguese (BP), we find strong and consistent offline results that point toward encoding similarity-based interference. However, the online results only partially support this perspective: In EP, we find encoding interference in the gender-unmarked reflexive and the post-critical regions, while in BP, the effect is only marginally significant in the post-critical region. In addition, in BP, but not in EP, we consistently observe the effects of the participants’ accuracy on reading time, with less accurate readers being consistently faster. Overall, our results show that during reflexive pronoun resolution, memory interference can have a negative impact, both during online (reading time) and offline (comprehension accuracy) language processing. With the present study, we contribute to the literature by expanding the set of the tested languages and with more evidence of encoding similarity-based interference, not driven by retrieval cues, on language processing. Moreover, our results are in line with previous studies replicating an asymmetry between robust offline results and elusive online effects. Also, in line with previous studies, our results show that similarity-based interference in grammatical sentences is subtle and may easily be hidden by the large variability between participants (e.g., mean accuracy).

Lab head

Paula Luegi
Department
  • Laboratório de Psicolinguística - Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa

Members (2)

João Veríssimo
  • University of Lisbon
Jéssica Gomes
  • University of Lisbon