Lab

Climate group at PMOD/WRC


Featured research (14)

The January 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai (HT) eruption injected sulfur dioxide and unprecedented amounts of water vapour (WV) into the stratosphere. Given the manifold impacts of previous volcanic eruptions, the full implications of these emissions are a topic of active research. This study explores the dynamical implications of the perturbed upper-atmospheric composition using an ensemble simulation with the Earth system model SOCOLv4. The simulations replicate the observed anomalies in the stratospheric and lower-mesospheric chemical composition and reveal a novel pathway linking water-rich volcanic eruptions to surface climate anomalies. We show that in early 2023 the excess WV caused significant negative anomalies in tropical upper-stratospheric and mesospheric ozone and temperature, forcing an atmospheric circulation response that particularly affected the Northern Hemisphere polar vortex (PV). The decreased temperature gradient leads to a weakening of the PV, which propagates downward similarly to sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) and drives surface anomalies via stratosphere–troposphere coupling. These results underscore the potential of HT to create favorable conditions for SSWs in subsequent winters as long as the near-stratopause cooling effect of excess WV persists. Our findings highlight the complex interactions between volcanic activity and climate dynamics and offer crucial insights for future climate modelling and attribution.
The stratospheric aerosol is an important climate forcing agent as it scatters some of the incoming solar radiation back to space, thus cooling the Earth’s surface and the troposphere. At the same time it absorbs some of the upwelling terrestrial radiation, which heats the stratosphere. It also plays an important role in stratospheric ozone chemistry by hosting heterogeneous reactions. Major volcanic eruptions can cause strong perturbations of stratospheric aerosol, changing its radiative and chemical effects by more than an order of magnitude. Many global climate models require prescribed stratospheric aerosol as input to properly simulate both climate effects in the presence and absence of volcanic eruptions. This paper describes REMAP, a retrieval method and code for aerosol properties that has been used in several model intercomparison projects (under the name SAGE-3/4λ). The code fits a single-mode log-normal size distribution for a pure aqueous sulfuric acid aerosol to aerosol extinction coefficients from observational or model data sets. From the retrieved size distribution parameters the code calculates the effective radius, surface area density, as well as extinction coefficients, single-scattering albedos and asymmetry factors of the aerosol within the wavelength bands specified by individual climate models. We validate the REMAP using balloon observations after the Pinatubo and Hunga-Tonga Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruptions, as well as four decades of LIDAR measurements. Within the constraints of a single-mode log-normal distribution REMAP generates realistic effective radii and surface area densities after volcanic eruptions and generally matches the LIDAR backscatter time series within measurement uncertainty. Deviations in aerosol backscatter up to a factor of 2 arise when (non-volcanic) tropospheric intrusions (e.g. from wildfires) are present and their composition deviates significantly from the background type. We describe the products that have been used in CCMI, CMIP6 and other model intercomparison projects, and provide practical instructions for use of the code.
Under climate change driven by increased carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, stratospheric ozone will respond to temperature and circulation changes, and lead to chemistry-climate feedback by modulating large-scale atmospheric circulation and Earth's energy budget. However, there is a significant model uncertainty since many processes are involved and few models have a detailed chemistry scheme. This work employs the latest data from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), to investigate the ozone response to increased CO2. We find that in most models, ozone increases in the upper stratosphere (US) and extratropical lower stratosphere (LS), and decreases in the tropical LS, thus the total column ozone (TCO) response is small in the tropics. The ozone response is mainly driven by the slower chemical destruction cycles in the US and enhanced upwelling in the LS, with a highly model-dependent Arctic ozone response to polar vortex strength changes. We then explore the feedback exerted by ozone on climate, by combining offline calculations and comparisons between models with ("chem") and without ("no-chem") interactive chemistry. We find that the stratospheric temperature response is substantial, with a global negative radiative forcing by up to -0.2 W m-2. We find that chem models consistently simulate less tropospheric warming and strong weakening of the polar stratospheric vortex, which results in a larger increase of sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) frequency than in most no-chem models. Our findings show that ozone-climate feedback is essential for the climate system and should be considered in the development of Earth System Models.
Most research of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) for solar radiation modification has focused on injection of SO2. However, the resulting sulfuric acid aerosols lead to considerable absorption of terrestrial infrared radiation, resulting in stratospheric warming and reduced cooling efficiency. Recent research suggests that solid particles, such as alumina, calcite or diamond, could minimize these side effects. Here we use, for the first time, the atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0, incorporating a solid particle scheme, to assess the climatic impacts of SAI by these injection materials. For each substance, we model tropical SAI by means of constant yearly injection of solid particles, aimed to offset the warming induced by a high-GHG emission scenario over the 2020–2100 period by 1 K. We show that solid particles are more effective than sulfur at minimising stratospheric heating, and the resulting side-effects on the general atmospheric circulation, stratospheric moistening, and tropopause height change. As a result, solid particles also induce less residual warming over the arctic, resulting in greater reduction of GHG-induced polar amplification compared to sulfuric acid aerosols. Among the materials studied here, diamond is most efficient in reducing global warming per unit injection, while also minimizing side effects.
Solar particle events (SPEs) are short-lived bursts of high-energy particles from the solar atmosphere and are widely recognized as posing significant economic risks to modern society. Most SPEs are relatively weak and have minor impacts on the Earth’s environment, but historic records contain much stronger SPEs which have the potential to alter atmospheric chemistry, impacting climate and biological life. The impacts of such strong SPEs would be far more severe when the Earth’s protective geomagnetic field is weak, such as during past geomagnetic excursions or reversals. Here, we model the impacts of an extreme SPE under different geomagnetic field strengths, focusing on changes in atmospheric chemistry and surface radiation using the atmosphere–ocean–chemistry–climate model SOCOL3-MPIOM and the radiation transfer model LibRadtran. Under current geomagnetic conditions, an extreme SPE would increase NO x concentrations in the polar stratosphere and mesosphere, causing reductions in extratropical stratospheric ozone lasting for about a year. In contrast, with no geomagnetic field, there would be a substantial increase in NO x throughout the entire atmosphere, resulting in severe stratospheric ozone depletion for several years. The resulting ground-level ultraviolet (UV) radiation would remain elevated for up to 6 y, leading to increases in UV index up to 20 to 25% and solar-induced DNA damage rates by 40 to 50%. The potential evolutionary impacts of past extreme SPEs remain an important question, while the risks they pose to human health in modern conditions continue to be underestimated.

Lab head

Timofei Sukhodolov
Department
  • Climate group

Members (4)

E. Rozanov
  • PMOD/WRC and IAC ETH Zurich
Tatiana A. Egorova
  • Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos
Jan Sedlacek
  • Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos
Andrin Jörimann
  • Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos

Alumni (2)

Arseniy Karagodin
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christina Brodowsky
  • University of Oslo