Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)

Published by De Gruyter

Online ISSN: 1865-9373

·

Print ISSN: 0005-8076

Articles


Mären-Priapeia. Deutungsgehalte des Obszönen im 'Nonnenturnier' und seinen europäischen Motivverwandten. In: PBB 124 (2002), S. 261-301.
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2002

·

1,158 Reads

Download
Share









Gothic siuns , the Domain of Verner's Law and the Relative Chronology of Grimm's, Verner's and Kluge's Laws in Germanic

September 2003

·

51 Reads

In various articles published over the last two decades or so, Frederik Kortlandt (1978, 1988, 1991; reaffirmed 1996, 2000), building on his theory that the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) mediae were preglottalized voiced stops (Kortlandt 1978 and more especially 1981, 1985) has claimed, contrary to the traditional view (e.g. Voyles 1992, p. 40; Mottausch 1999, p. 47), (1) that the redistribution of consonantal quality on the basis of accentual context known as Verner's law preceded the rise of voiceless spirants in Proto-Germanic (PGm.), which is often, along with other processes, called Grimm's law, and (2) that the voiced (or lenis) spirants were not a feature of PGm. Since there appears to be little detailed discussion of these last two conclusions of Kortlandt's in the literature - and Bernard Mees (personal communication 30/10/1998, p. 6) has even gone so far as to say that »it is incumbent on [me] to demonstrate that there was no early Verner vis-à-vis Grimm, not [my] critics vice versa« - the intention of the remarks below is to offer a detailed assessment of Kortlandt's arguments.






The origin of Thurneysen's law: A detailed analysis of the evidence

January 2000

·

68 Reads

Herewith are presented the results of the investigation into Thurneysen's law in Gothic alluded to in my earlier article (Woodhouse 1998) on early Germanic obstruent development. For a good introduction to Thurneysen's law with literature, discussion of a number of key issues, including criticism of recent views, the reader is referred to Suzuki (1992). Some criticisms of Suzuki's own views are contained in my earlier (1998) paper.










Top-cited authors