International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC)

Journal description

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology es una revista de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud que publica Artículos originales, Artículos de revisión, Informes breves, Casos clínicos y Revisiones de libros, con lo que la revista pretende ser un instrumento de comunicación científica de los psicólogos clínicos y psicólogos de la salud europeos y americanos.

Current impact factor: 2.79

Impact Factor Rankings

2016 Impact Factor Available summer 2017
2009 Impact Factor 1.792

Additional details

5-year impact 2.04
Cited half-life 3.70
Immediacy index 0.17
Eigenfactor 0.00
Article influence 0.25
Website International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology website
ISSN 1697-2600

Publications in this journal

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reviews the emergence of research on fitting treatment procedures to the unique needs and proclivities of patients. Traditional research on efficacy of psychotherapy focuses on the role of interventions and theoretical brands, minimizing factors that cannot be randomly assigned. This line of research has not realized its initial and desired promise, perhaps because it fails to incorporate into the study of psychotherapy important and effective treatment variations that are associated with therapist and non-diagnostic patient factors. Contemporary efforts to “fit” treatments to patients emphasize the roles of interventions, participant factors, and contextual/relationship factors. For these complex interactions, any of which reflect factors that cannot be randomly assigned, randomized clinical trials (RCT) protocols are inappropriate as a “gold standard”. Several studies are presented which illustrate not only the predictive power of incorporating both treatment mediators and moderators into the realm of psychotherapy study, but the value of a multi-method approach to research. Converging studies moreover, provide a way to incorporate matching algorithms into decisions about assigning optimal treatments.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at high risk of substance use (SU). The aims of the current study were: 1) to examine the use of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and other illegal drugs by adults with and without ADHD; 2) to compare the oppositional, conduct, anxiety, depression, sleep and antisocial personality symptoms of ADHD adults with SU and ADHD adults without SU; 3) to examine the ability of ADHD symptoms and conduct problems to predict SU. A total of 93 young adults, 43 without ADHD and 50 with a childhood diagnosis of ADHD, who were part of the Spanish sample of the Multicenter ADHD Genetics (IMAGE) study, collaborated in a follow-up evaluation 10.1 years later. ADHD participants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of SU. Statistically significant differences were found between young adults with and without ADHD in their use of tobacco, marijuana and alcohol. A statistically significant association was also shown between externalization problems and a greater risk of SU. Conduct problems, to a greater degree than ADHD symptoms, affect SU in ADHD adults.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A longitudinal study was conducted to assess the presence of beliefs about symptoms related to hypertension and the time since diagnosis in which they appear. A randomly selected sample of hypertensive patients (67% women, mean age 53.27 years and range 2065) was divided into four groups according to the time from diagnosis. All patients (N=171) were interviewed at the beginning (initial assessment) and 12 months later (final assessment) and the patients (n=75) who did not report beliefs about symptoms at the initial assessment were interviewed in a follow-up schedule. The results showed that 56% of patients reported beliefs about symptoms at the initial assessment, and this percentage increased to 77% at the final assessment (p < .001) finding significant differences between the two groups with a more recent diagnosis and the two groups of long-standing patients. Longitudinal analysis of the group with the recent diagnosis showed that the critical period for the emergence of beliefs was the first year from diagnosis. This period could be decisive in order to prevent them. Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the emergence of these beliefs, as they could negatively affect treatment adherence. (C) 2015 Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductuat. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (
    Preview · Article · Aug 2015 · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology