Hearing Research (HEARING RES)

Publisher: Elsevier

Journal description

The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental studies, but theoretical papers will also be considered. The editor of the journal is prepared to accept original research papers in the form of full-length papers, short communications, letters to the Editor, and reviews. Papers submitted should deal with auditory neurophysiology, ultrastructure, psychoacoustics and behavioural studies of hearing in animals, and models of auditory functions. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing in animals and man, and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will not be accepted unless they contribute to the understanding of normal hearing functions.

Current impact factor: 2.97

Impact Factor Rankings

2016 Impact Factor Available summer 2017
2014 / 2015 Impact Factor 2.968
2013 Impact Factor 2.848
2012 Impact Factor 2.537
2011 Impact Factor 2.696
2010 Impact Factor 2.428
2009 Impact Factor 2.177
2008 Impact Factor 2.333
2007 Impact Factor 2.062
2006 Impact Factor 1.584
2005 Impact Factor 1.674
2004 Impact Factor 1.578
2003 Impact Factor 1.502
2002 Impact Factor 1.969
2001 Impact Factor 1.586
2000 Impact Factor 1.753
1999 Impact Factor 1.804
1998 Impact Factor 1.598
1997 Impact Factor 1.915
1996 Impact Factor 1.641
1995 Impact Factor 1.908
1994 Impact Factor 1.744
1993 Impact Factor 1.853
1992 Impact Factor 1.792

Impact factor over time

Impact factor

Additional details

5-year impact 3.14
Cited half-life >10.0
Immediacy index 1.24
Eigenfactor 0.01
Article influence 1.07
Website Hearing Research website
Other titles Hearing research
ISSN 0378-5955
OCLC 4410062
Material type Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details


  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Authors pre-print on any website, including arXiv and RePEC
    • Author's post-print on author's personal website immediately
    • Author's post-print on open access repository after an embargo period of between 12 months and 48 months
    • Permitted deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate, may be required to comply with embargo periods of 12 months to 48 months
    • Author's post-print may be used to update arXiv and RepEC
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • Must link to publisher version with DOI
    • Author's post-print must be released with a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License
    • Publisher last reviewed on 03/06/2015
  • Classification

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The tympanic membrane (TM) represents a pressure buffer, which contributes to the overall pressure regulation of the middle ear (ME). This buffer capacity is based on its viscoelastic properties combined with those of the attached ossicular chain, muscles and ligaments. The current work presents a set of in vivo recordings of the ME pressure variations normally occurring in common life: elevator motion. This is defined as a situation of smooth ambient pressure increase or decrease on a limited range and at a low rate of pressure change. Based on these recordings, the purpose was a quantitative analysis of the TM buffer capacity including the TM compliance. Methods: The pressure changes in seven normal adult MEs with intact TM's were continuously recorded directly inside the ME cavity during four different elevator trips using a high precision instrument. The TM buffer capacity was determined by the ratio between the changes in ME and the ambient pressure. Further, the ME volumes were calculated by Boyle's Law from pressure recordings during inflation-deflation tests; subsequently the TM compliance could be also calculated. Finally, the correlation between the ME volume and buffer function was determined. Results: Twenty-one elevator trips could be used for the analysis. The overall mean TM pressure buffering capacity was 23.3 % (SEM = 3.4), whereas the mean overall compliance was 28.9 × 10(-3) μL/Pa (SEM = 4.8). A strong negative linear correlation was found between the TM buffer capacity and the ME volumes (R(2) = 0.92). Conclusions: These results were in fair agreement with the literature obtained in clinical as well as temporal bone experiments, and they provide an in vivo reference for the normal ME function as well as for ME modeling. The TM buffer capacity was found more efficient in smaller mastoids. Possible clinical implications are discussed.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Hearing Research

  • No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Hearing Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) represents the discrepancy between the binaural waveform and the sum of monaural ones. A typical ABR binaural interaction in humans is a reduction of the binaural amplitude compared to the monaural sum at the wave-V latency, i.e., the DN1 component. It has been considered that the DN1 is mainly elicited by high frequency components of stimuli whereas some studies have shown the contribution of low-to-middle frequency components to the DN1. To examine this issue, the present study compared the ABR binaural interaction elicited by tone pips (1 kHz, 10-ms duration) with the one by clicks (a rectangular wave, 0.1-ms duration) presented at 80 dB peak equivalent SPL and a fixed stimulus onset interval (180 ms). The DN1 due to tone pips was vulnerable compared to the click-evoked DN1. The pip-evoked DN1 was significantly detected under auditory attention whereas it failed to reach significance under visual attention. The click-evoked DN1 was robustly present for the two attention conditions. The current results might confirm the high frequency sound contribution to the DN1 elicitation. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2015 · Hearing Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As frequency is one of the most basic elements of sound, it is not surprising that the earliest stages of auditory cortical processing are tonotopically organized. In cats, there are four known tonotopically organized cortical areas: the anterior (AAF), posterior (PAF), and ventral posterior (VPAF) auditory fields and primary auditory cortex (A1). Electrophysiological and anatomical evidence have suggested that AAF and A1 form core auditory cortex. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could be used to define the borders of all four tonotopically organized areas, identify core auditory cortex, and demonstrate tonotopy similar to that found using more invasive techniques. Five adult cats were examined. Eight different pure tones or one broad-band noise (BBN) stimuli were presented in a block paradigm during continuous fMRI scanning. Analysis was performed on each animal individually using conservative familywise error thresholds. Group analysis was performed by extracting data from fMRI analysis software and performing a battery of statistical tests. In auditory cortex, a reversal of the tonotopic gradient is known to occur at the borders between tonotopically organized areas. Therefore, high and low tones were used to delineate these borders. Activations in response to BBN as opposed to tonal stimulation demonstrated that core auditory cortex consists of both A1 and AAF. Finally, tonotopy was identified in each of the four known tonotopically organized areas. Therefore, we conclude that fMRI is effective at defining all four tonotopically organized cortical areas and delineating core auditory cortex. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2015 · Hearing Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The central auditory system produces combination-sensitive neurons tuned to a specific combination of multiple signal elements. Some of these neurons act as coincidence detectors with delay lines for the extraction of spectro-temporal information from sounds. "Delay-tuned" neurons of mustached bats are tuned to a combination of up to four signal elements with a specific delay between them and form a delay map. They are produced in the inferior colliculus by the coincidence of the rebound response following glycinergic inhibition to the first harmonic of a biosonar pulse with the short-latency response to the 2nd-3rd harmonics of its echo. Compared with collicular delay-tuned neurons, thalamic and cortical ones respond more to pulse-echo pairs than individual sounds. Cortical delay-tuned neurons are clustered in the three separate areas. They interact with each other through a circuit mediating positive feedback and lateral inhibition for adjustment and improvement of the delay tuning of cortical and subcortical neurons. The current article reviews the mechanisms for delay tuning and the response properties of collicular, thalamic and cortical delay-tuned neurons in relation to hierarchical signal processing. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2015 · Hearing Research
  • Source

    Preview · Article · Feb 2015 · Hearing Research