Recent publications
The cytogenetic risk category retains a pivotal role in the prediction of prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), however, its impact on secondary AML (sAML) is less established. We assessed whether the ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk score predicts outcomes in sAML patients in remission undergoing HSCT from HLA-matched donors performed between 2010 and 2022. Among 1119 patients, 829 had intermediate and 284 had adverse cytogenetics (6 with favorable risk were excluded). Engraftment rates was 72.4% vs. 99.5%. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence did not differ, but 2-years all grades and extensive chronic GVHD were higher in the intermediate vs. adverse cytogenetics risk groups, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72; p = 0.034 and HR = 0.58; p = 0.027, respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was similar. All other HSCT outcomes were inferior in the adverse risk vs. intermediate-risk patients: The HR for 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 2.48 (95% CI 1.95–3.15, p < 0.001). The HRs for 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 1.62 (95% CI 1.34–1.95, p < 0.001), 1.59 (95% CI 1.3–1.93, p < 0.001) and 1.38 (95% CI 1.15–1.65, p < 0.001), respectively. We conclude that cytogenetic risk score predicts HSCT outcomes in sAML patients.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains an important curative treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Over time, significant progress in transplant and post-transplant care has allowed the delivery of transplant to older patients. We assessed changes over time in characteristics and outcomes in patients ≥60 years with ALL using a dataset from the EBMT registry. We identified 832 adult patients, with T-cell ALL (n = 143), Philadelphia chromosome positive B-cell ALL (n = 471), or Philadelphia chromosome negative B-cell ALL, transplanted 2010–2022 in first remission irrespective of the donor type. Those included 280 patients transplanted in 2010–2015, and 552 patients transplanted in 2016–2022. Patients transplanted in recent years were slightly older, more likely to have T or Ph- B-ALL and to receive a myeloablative total body irradiation conditioning. The 2-year leukemia free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) increased over time from 42–55% and from 51–65%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, LFS, OS, chronic and extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease rates were better in recent years (hazard ratio[HR] 0.68, 0.71, 0.66 and 0.5, respectively). These real-world data can serve as a benchmark indicating that the opportunity for transplant for the fit elderly should be considered and offered when possible.
Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) reduced chronic GVHD after matched related donor (MRD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) from 69% to 32% in a randomized trial and is the recommended standard in Europe. Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an emerging alternative but lacks such solid data in MRD alloSCT. We therefore analyzed outcomes of rATG (n = 4140) vs. PTCy (n = 1069) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing MRD alloSCT between 2017 and 2021 in the EBMT database. The provided hazard ratios (HR) and P-values are adjusted for potential risk factors using multivariate analysis. Results are given at 2 years after alloSCT for all endpoints except for acute GVHD (100 days). The main difference was a lower relapse incidence after PTCy vs. rATG (26.2% vs. 32.8%; HR 0.78 [CI 95%: 0.66–0.92], p = 0.003). Interaction analyses confirmed the consistency of this result across different disease risk index and conditioning intensity subgroups. Other major transplant outcomes showed no significant differences: non-relapse mortality, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, incidence and severity of acute GVHD as well as chronic GVHD. In summary, PTCy results in comparable GVHD and survival outcomes but lower relapse rates compared to rATG. We conclude that PTCy can be recommended in MRD alloSCT.
Aims
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is often diagnosed in elderly patients with comorbidities. Although initial monotherapy is recommended for these patients, the value of combination therapy remains unclear. Here, we compare the efficacy of initial monotherapy and combination therapy in PAH patients with cardiovascular comorbidities.
Methods and results
Data from adult patients with incident pre‐capillary PAH and cardiovascular comorbidities from the COMPERA database (European registry for PH) were analysed. A matched‐pair analysis of patients treated with monotherapy versus combination therapy based on age, sex, WHO functional class (FC) and 4‐strata risk at baseline was performed. The matching strategy identified 216 pairs of PAH patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, who differed considerably from the enrolled patient population (n = 1871), especially in terms of mean age (mono: matched pairs 62.9 ± 13.5 years vs. 70.6 ± 11.4 years, combination: matched pairs 62.0 ± 13.6 years vs. 60.5 ± 14.9 years). In the matched‐pair analysis, the initial combination therapy group showed more pronounced improvements in WHO‐FC, N‐terminal pro–B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT‐proBNP) and risk status than patients treated with initial monotherapy, with no significant differences in 6‐min walk distance (6MWD), PAH‐related hospitalisations, survival and drug discontinuation.
Conclusions
This analysis suggests that PAH patients with comorbidities may benefit more pronounced from combination therapy regarding WHO‐FC, BNP/NT‐pro‐BNP and risk status without a significant difference in survival. Good tolerability is indicated. However, given the relatively younger patient matched subgroup, these findings may not necessarily apply to older patients with a wider range of comorbidities.
Tuberculosis (TB) is rare following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this multinational retrospective study, we report the frequency, characteristics, and outcome of TB following HCT performed during 2000–2019. Fifty-two patients (35 (67%) males, 15 (29%) children) from 24 centers developed TB following allogeneic (n = 47) or autologous (n = 5) HCT; with the relative frequency of 0.21% and 0.025%, respectively. Forty (77%) were bacteriologically, 12 (23%) clinically confirmed. The median time from HCT to TB was 135 (range, 16–3225) days. Eighteen (35%) patients with extrapulmonary TB (mainly involving lymph nodes and liver/spleen) were significantly younger, developed TB shorter after HCT, more often had inherited underlying disease, and received immunosuppressive therapy at TB diagnosis as compared to pulmonary TB. Five (22%) of 23 patients with drug-susceptibility testing performed, were resistant to at least one anti-TB drug. Treatment success was achieved in 38/50 (76%) of treated patients. One-year overall survival reached 75.7% and the 1-year cumulative incidence of TB-associated death was 18.1%. Concluding, TB is a rare, albeit severe complication, which can develop any time after HCT, frequently involves extrapulmonary sites, and results in high mortality rates. High proportion of drug-resistant TB warrants routine susceptibility testing.
Prophylaxis strategies for Graft versus host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) frequently encompass a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with either methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The aim of this retrospective, EBMT registry‐based study was to determine outcome differences for chronic myeloid malignancies and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) between MTX‐ and MMF‐based prophylaxis regimens while taking potential heterogeneity between subgroups into consideration. Eligible were patients transplanted between 2007 and 2017 who received either MTX‐ or MMF prophylaxis in combination with a CNI. Endpoints after allo‐HCT were overall survival, relapse‐free survival (RFS), relapse incidence, non‐relapse mortality (NRM), and Grades 2–4 acute GVHD (aGvHD). Overall, 13 699 patients from 321 centers were included. Median follow‐up was 42.8 months (IQR 19.8–74.5 months). MTX prophylaxis was associated with reduced overall mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.95, p = 0.001) and NRM (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.96, p = 0.006) compared with MMF in multivariable Cox regression models in the whole cohort without significant interaction between prophylaxis and subgroups. In contrast, there was no significant association of prophylaxis with risk of relapse (HR 1.03 MTX vs. MMF, 95% CI 0.94–1.14, p = 0.53) or RFS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88–1.01, p = 0.12). There was a reduced risk of Grades 2–4 acute GVHD and reduced mortality after acute GVHD with MTX prophylaxis but no association with outcome in a landmark analysis in patients without aGvHD at 3 months after allo‐HCT. In conclusion, MTX‐complemented CNI prophylaxis was associated with favorable survival, and with favorable survival after aGVHD compared with MMF.
In patients diagnosed with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL) relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), it is a standard practice to perform anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. When collected from the patient after allo-HCT, the produced CAR-T cells are likely to be donor T-cell-derived, creating unknown safety risks due to their potential allo-reactivity. We therefore performed an EBMT registry-based study on the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in this setting. We included 257 allo-HCT patients (n = 172 ≥ 18 years) with B-ALL or B-NHL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells (tisagenlecleucel n = 184, brexucabtagene autoleucel n = 43 and axicabtagene ciloleucel n = 30), between 2018 and 2022. Three patients developed aGvHD, whereas 6 patients developed cGvHD after CAR T-cell. The 100-day cumulative incidence (CI) of new aGvHD was 1.6% and the 12-month CI of new cGvHD was 2.8%. The 1-year GvHD relapse-free survival and non-relapse mortality were 52.1% and 4.7%, respectively. Last, with a median follow up of 18.8 months, the 1-year overall survival was 76.8%. In summary, the GvHD rate in allo-HCT patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is relatively low. Our data support the view that GvHD is not a major safety issue in this setting.
Analytes, from sample preparation, until entering an analytical instrument, are prone to adsorb to surfaces, driven by the chemical properties of the surface and the liquids they are dissolved in. This problem can be addressed with internal standards when a single or few known analytes are quantified that are usually not available in omics. However, minimal to no loss of analytes is the aim. Here, we present a novel assay for qualifying and quantifying interactions responsible for adsorption of molecules to surfaces (APS) by using LC–MS/MS‐based differential quantitative analysis. To reflect a broad range of chemical interactions with surfaces, a reference mixture of thousands of tryptic peptides, with known compositions was selected, representing a variety of different chemical characteristics. The assay was tested by investigating the adsorption properties of several different vials with different surface chemistries. A significant number of hydrophobic peptides adsorbed to conventional polypropylene vials. In contrast, only few peptides adsorbed to polypropylene vials, assigned as low‐protein‐binding. The highest number of peptides adsorbed to glass vials driven by electrostatic interactions. In summary, the new assay is suitable to characterize adsorption properties of different surfaces and to approximate the loss of analytes during sample preparation.
The PEGASUS study is the first multicentric and prospective assessment of the safety of air travel flying in pulmonary hypertension (PH) (NCT03051763). Data of air travel from 60 patients with PH was available. No severe adverse events occurred. Nine patients self‐reported mild adverse events during flight (13%), while after landing, 12 patients reported events (20%). Solely one patient (2%) had an adverse event leading to medical consultation. In patients with PH and World Health Organization functional classes II and III, air travel was safe.
We compared relapse incidence (RI) post‐unrelated transplantation with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) versus no PTCy graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, in 7049 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in remission, 707 with PTCy, and 6342 without (No PTCy). The patients in the PTCy group were younger, 52.7 versus 56.6 years (p < .001). There were more 9/10 donors in the PTCy group, 33.8% versus 16.4% (p < .001), and more received myeloablative conditioning, 61.7% versus 50.2% (p < .001). In the No PTCy group, 87.7% of patients received in vivo T‐cell depletion. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were lower in the PTCy versus No PTCy group, 93.8% and 80.9% versus 97.6% and 92.6% (p < .001). RI was not significantly different in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–1.37) (p = .31). Acute GVHD grades II–IV and III–IV, were significantly lower in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.92, p = .007) and HR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.38–0.83, p = .004), as were total and extensive chronic GVHD, HRs of 0.5 (95% CI 0.41–0.62, p < .001) and HR = 0.31 (95% CI 0.22–0.42, p < .001). Non‐relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower with PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.5–0.91, p = .007). GVHD‐free, relapse‐free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.81, p = .001). Leukemia‐free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the groups. In summary, we observed comparable RI, OS, and LFS, significantly lower incidences of GVHD and NRM, and significantly higher GRFS in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor‐hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with PTCy versus No PTCy GVHD prophylaxis.
There is a high risk of GVHD and non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic stem cell transplantations (alloSCT) from unrelated donors. Prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) is standard in Europe but post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an emerging alternative. We analyzed outcomes of rATG (n = 7725) vs. PTCy (n = 1039) prophylaxis in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing peripheral blood alloSCT from 10/10 antigen-matched unrelated donors (MUD) between January 2018 and June 2021 in the EBMT database. The provided P-values and hazard ratios (HR) are derived from multivariate analysis. Two years after alloSCT, NRM in the PTCy group was 12.1% vs. 16.4% in the rATG group; p = 0.016; HR 0.72. Relapse was less frequent after PTCy vs. rATG (22.8% vs. 26.6%; p = 0.046; HR 0.87). Overall survival after PTCy was higher (73.1% vs. 65.9%; p = 0.001, HR 0.82). Progression free survival was better after PTCy vs. rATG (64.9% vs. 57.2%; p < 0.001, HR 0.83). The incidence of chronic GVHD was lower after PTCy (28.4% vs. rATG 31.4%; p = 0.012; HR 0.77), whereas the incidence and severity of acute GVHD were not significantly different. GVHD-free relapse-free survival was significantly higher in the PTCy arm compared to the rATG arm (2 y incidence: 51% vs. 45%; HR: 0.86 [95% CI 0.75–0.99], p = 0.035). In the absence of evidence from randomized controlled trials, our findings support a preference for the use of PTCy in adult recipients of peripheral blood alloSCTs from MUD.
Management of Richter transformation (RT) is particularly challenging, with survival estimates <1 year. We report on outcomes of 66 RT patients undergoing allogeneic-HCT (allo-HCT) between 2008 and 2018 registered with the EBMT. Median age at allo-HCT was 56.2 years (interquartile range (IQR), 51.3–63.1). Median time from RT to allo-HCT was 6.9 months (IQR, 4.9–11) and 28 (42.4%) were in complete remission (CR). The majority underwent reduced intensity conditioning (66.2%) using peripheral blood derived stem cells. Eighteen (27.3%) patients had a matched sibling donor, 24 (36.4%) a matched unrelated donor and the remaining were mismatched. Median follow-up was 6.6 years; 1- and 3- year overall and progression free survival (PFS) (95% CI) was 65% (54–77) and 39% (27–51) and 53% (41–65) and 29% (18–40), respectively. Patients in CR at time of allo-HCT had significantly better 3-year PFS (39% vs. 21%, p = 0.032). Cumulative incidences of grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) at day +100 was 41% (95% CI 29–53) and chronic GVHD at 3 years was 53% (95% CI 41–65). High rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were observed; 38% (95% CI, 26–50) at 3 years. Although potentially curative, approaches to reduce considerable NRM and chronic GVHD rates are required.
Diagnosis and therapy of esophageal carcinoma is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of the updated German guideline “Diagnosis and Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus—version 3.1” is to provide practical and evidence‐based advice for the management of patients with esophageal cancer. Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel based on an extensive and systematic evaluation of the published medical literature and the application of well‐established methodologies (e.g. Oxford evidence grading scheme, grading of recommendations). Accurate diagnostic evaluation of the primary tumor as well as lymph node and distant metastases is required in order to guide patients to a stage‐appropriate therapy after the initial diagnosis of esophageal cancer. In high‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal carcinoma endoscopic resection shall be performed. Whether endoscopic resection is the definitive therapeutic measure depends on the histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. Esophagectomy should be performed minimally invasive or in combination with open procedures (hybrid technique). Because the prognosis in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with surgery alone, multimodality therapy is recommended. In locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative radiochemotherapy should be administered. In locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by complete resection or definitive radiochemotherapy without surgery should be performed. In the case of residual tumor in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and R0 resection of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab should be given. Systemic palliative treatment options (chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone) in unresectable or metastastic esophageal cancer depend on histology and are stratified according to PD‐L1 and/or Her2 expression.
In the 2022 European LeukemiaNet classification, patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1)‐mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were classified in the adverse‐risk category in the presence of high‐risk cytogenetics (CG). Nonetheless, the impact of various CG aberrations on posttransplant outcomes remains to be unraveled. This registry study analyzed adult patients with NPM1‐mutated de novo AML who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the first complete remission from 2005 to 2021. A total of 3275 patients were identified, 2782 had normal karyotype, 493 had chromosomal aberrations including 160 with adverse‐risk CG, 72 patients had complex karyotype (CK), and 66 monosomal karyotype (MK). Overall, 2377 (73%) patients had FLT3‐ITD. On univariate analysis, only FLT3‐ITD, minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity and CK, but not abnormal CG, affected posttransplant outcomes. On multivariable analysis, CK was associated with lower overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72, p = .009). In the subgroup of 493 patients with aberrant CG, the 2‐year leukemia‐free survival (LFS) and OS were around 61% and 68%, respectively. On multivariable analysis for this subgroup, CK and MRD positivity were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR 1.7, p = .025; and 1.99, p = .003 respectively) and worse LFS (HR 1.62, p = .018; and 1.64, p = .011 respectively) while FLT3‐ITD, MK, or other CG abnormalities had no significant effect. Importantly, CK negatively affected OS (HR 1.91, p = .002). In the first complete remission transplant setting, CK was found as the only cytogenetic risk factor for worse outcomes in NPM1‐mutated AML. Nevertheless, even for this subgroup, a significant proportion of patients can achieve long‐term posttransplant survival.
Although CMML since long has been separated from MDS, many studies continue to evaluate the outcomes of both diseases after hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) together. Data evaluating outcomes of a large CMML cohort after allo‐HCT compared to MDS are limited. We aim to compare outcomes of CMML to MDS patients who underwent allo‐HCT between 2010 and 2018. Patients ≥18 years with CMML and MDS undergoing allo‐HCT reported to the EBMT registry were analyzed. Progression to AML before allo‐HCT was an exclusion criterion. Overall survival (OS), progression/relapse‐free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (including progression) (REL), and non‐relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models including interaction terms between disease and confounders. In total, 10832 patients who underwent allo‐HCT were included in the study, there were a total of 1466 CMML, and 9366 MDS. The median age at time of allo‐HCT in CMML (median 60.5, IQR 54.3–65.2 years) was significantly higher than in the MDS cohort (median 58.8, IQR 50.2–64.5 years; p < .001). A significantly higher percentage of CMML patients were male (69.4%) compared to MDS (61.2%; p < .001). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the distribution of Karnofsky score, Sorror HCT‐CI score at allo‐HCT, and donor type, between the CMML and MDS patients. RIC platforms were utilized in 63.9% of CMML allo‐HCT, and in 61.4% of MDS patients (p = .08). In univariable analyses, we found that OS, PFS, and REL were significantly worse in CMML when compared with MDS (all p < .0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in NRM (p = .77). In multivariable analyses, the HR comparing MDS versus CMML for OS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74–0.88, p < .001), PFS 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.82, p < .001), relapse 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74, p < .001), and NRM 0.87 (95% CI 0.78–0.98, p = .02), respectively. The association between baseline variables and outcome was found to be similar in MDS and CMML (all interaction p > .05) except for a decreasing trend over time of the risk of relapse in CMML (HR allo‐HCT per year later 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.98), whereas no such trend was observed in MDS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98–1.02). The poor outcome observed for CMML could be related to variables not measured in this study or to factors inherent to the disease itself. This study demonstrates that outcomes of CMML patients after allo‐HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS. The results of this study may contribute to future recommendations for allo‐HCT in CMML patients.
The optimal conditioning for patients with higher risk MDS receiving potentially curative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant(allo-HCT) remains to be defined. This is particularly the case for patients with excess of blasts at time of allo-HCT. Sequential (Seq) conditioning, whereby chemotherapy is followed rapidly by transplant conditioning, offers an opportunity to decrease disease burden, potentially improving outcomes allo-HCT outcomes. Herein we present the only analysis comparing Seq to myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) specifically focussed on MDS patients with excess of blasts at allo-HCT. 303 patients were identified in the EBMT registry, receiving RIC (n = 158), Seq (n = 105), and MAC (n = 40). Median follow-up was 67.2 months and median age at allo-HCT was 59.5 years (IQR 53.5–65.6). For the entire cohort, 3 y overall survival (OS) was 50% (95% CI 45–56%) and relapse free survival (RFS) 45% (95% CI 40–51%). No significant differences in OS (log-rank p = 0.13) and RFS (log-rank p = 0.18) were observed between conditioning protocols. On multivariable analysis, lower performance status, worse IPSS-R cytogenetics, sibling donor (compared to 8/8 MUD) and ≥20% blasts at allo-HCT were associated with worse outcomes. In conclusion, the Seq protocol did little to influence the outcome in this high-risk group of patients, with outcomes mostly determined by baseline disease risk and patient characteristics such as performance status.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is curative for myelofibrosis (MF) but assessing risk-benefit in individual patients is challenging. This complexity is amplified in CALR-mutated MF patients, as they live longer with conventional treatments compared to other molecular subtypes. We analyzed outcomes of 346 CALR-mutated MF patients who underwent allo-HCT in 123 EBMT centers between 2005 and 2019. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. Patients receiving busulfan-containing regimens achieved a 5-year OS rate of 71%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 16%, 22%, and 26%, respectively, while the incidence of relapse/progression was 11%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that older age correlated with worse OS, while primary MF and HLA mismatched transplants had a near-to-significant trend to decreased OS. Comparative analysis between CALR- and JAK2-mutated MF patients adjusting for confounding factors revealed better OS, lower NRM, lower relapse, and improved graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in CALR-mutated patients. These findings confirm the improved prognosis associated with CALR mutation in allo-HCT and support molecular profiling in prognostic scoring systems to predict OS after transplantation in MF.
Institution pages aggregate content on ResearchGate related to an institution. The members listed on this page have self-identified as being affiliated with this institution. Publications listed on this page were identified by our algorithms as relating to this institution. This page was not created or approved by the institution. If you represent an institution and have questions about these pages or wish to report inaccurate content, you can contact us here.
Information
Address
Hamburg, Germany
Website