Figure - available from: Queueing Systems
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
![ζ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\zeta _1$$\end{document}, sγ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$s_{\gamma _1}$$\end{document}, and η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} as functions of γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} for λ1=0.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\lambda _1=0.5$$\end{document}, exponential service times with rate μ1=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _1=1$$\end{document} for class 1 and different rates μ2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2$$\end{document} for class 2. The singularity η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} exists for all γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} when μ2=0.1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.1$$\end{document} and μ2=0.25\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.25$$\end{document}, since ζ1(0)>0.25\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\zeta _1(0)>0.25$$\end{document} (first case) while it only exists for larger values of γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} for μ2=0.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.5$$\end{document} and μ2=0.75\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.75$$\end{document} (third case). For μ2>ζ1(1)=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2>\zeta _1(1)=1$$\end{document}, η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} does not exist for any γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} (second case)](publication/360509939/figure/fig2/AS:1179973566107653@1658339029027/z1documentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym.png)
ζ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\zeta _1$$\end{document}, sγ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$s_{\gamma _1}$$\end{document}, and η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} as functions of γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} for λ1=0.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\lambda _1=0.5$$\end{document}, exponential service times with rate μ1=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _1=1$$\end{document} for class 1 and different rates μ2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2$$\end{document} for class 2. The singularity η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} exists for all γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} when μ2=0.1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.1$$\end{document} and μ2=0.25\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.25$$\end{document}, since ζ1(0)>0.25\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\zeta _1(0)>0.25$$\end{document} (first case) while it only exists for larger values of γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} for μ2=0.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.5$$\end{document} and μ2=0.75\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2=0.75$$\end{document} (third case). For μ2>ζ1(1)=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu _2>\zeta _1(1)=1$$\end{document}, η2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _2$$\end{document} does not exist for any γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _b$$\end{document} (second case)
Source publication
![ζ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360509939/figure/fig1/AS:1179973561925639@1658339028946/z1documentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
![ζ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360509939/figure/fig2/AS:1179973566107653@1658339029027/z1documentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
![λ2∗\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360509939/figure/fig3/AS:1179973566115841@1658339029054/l2documentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
![sγ1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360509939/figure/fig4/AS:1179973566103569@1658339029079/sg1documentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
![sγ1/γb\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360509939/figure/fig5/AS:1179973566111764@1658339029175/sg1-gbdocumentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
We analyze the asymptotics of waiting time distributions in the two-class accumulating priority queue with general service times. The accumulating priority queue was suggested by Kleinrock in the 60s—he coined it time-dependent priority—to diversify waiting time objectives of different classes in a paramaterized way. It also avoids the typical star...
Similar publications
![−log10(err)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360767880/figure/fig2/AS:11431281097177228@1668482222054/log10errdocumentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
![−log10(err)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath}...](publication/360767880/figure/fig5/AS:11431281097169539@1668482222288/log10errdocumentclass12ptminimal-usepackageamsmath-usepackagewasysym_Q320.jpg)
We deal with approximation of solutions of delay differential equations (DDEs) via the classical Euler algorithm. We investigate the pointwise error of the Euler scheme under nonstandard assumptions imposed on the right-hand side function f. Namely, we assume that f is globally of at most linear growth, satisfies globally one-side Lipschitz conditi...
Citations
... The problem of optimal management in such systems is much more complicated than in single-server systems due to the larger dimensionality of the stochastic process that describes the dynamics of the system. However, the importance of consideration of such priority queueing systems made them a popular subject of research; see, e.g., the papers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] published within the last two years. ...
In this paper, we analyze a multi-server queueing system with a marked Markov arrival process of two types of customers and a phase-type distribution of service time depending on the type of customer. Customers of both types are assumed to be impatient and renege from the buffers after an exponentially distributed number of times. The strategy of flexible provisioning of priorities is analyzed. It assumes a randomized choice of the customers from the buffers, with probabilities dependent on the relation between the number of customers in a priority finite buffer and the fixed threshold value. To simplify the construction of the underlying Markov chain and the derivation of the explicit form of its generator, we use the so-called generalized phase-type distribution. It is shown that the created Markov chain fits the category of asymptotically quasi-Toeplitz Markov chains. Using this fact, we show that the considered Markov chain is ergodic for any value of the system parameters and compute its stationary distribution. Expressions for key performance measures are presented. Numerical results that show how the parameters of the control strategy affect the system’s performance measurements are given. It is shown that the results can be used for managerial purposes and that it is crucial to take correlation in the arrival process into account.
... The classical books on priority queues are [10][11][12][13]. As recent papers dealing with priority queues, the papers [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] can be mentioned. ...
In this paper, a multi-server queueing system providing service to two correlated flows of requests was considered. Non-preemptive priority was granted to one flow via the preliminary delay of requests in the intermediate buffers with different rates of extracting from the buffers. Customers’ impatience during waiting in the intermediate and main buffers was taken into account. The possibility of the use of the results of the mathematical analysis for managerial goals is numerically illustrated.
