Figure 11 - uploaded by O. Malandraki
Content may be subject to copyright.
![(left) Time evolution of directional e -intensity measurements during the July 22, 2020 event From top to bottom: 40.9-46.2 keV e -intensities observed by the four EPD apertures; pitch-angle coverage for each aperture; PAD with color-coded intensity for the same energy range shown in the first energy panel (top right) e -PAD by STEP at three different energy bands during the July 22 event (bottom right) SolO/RPW radio dynamic spectrum observed in association with the e -event and the e -c/v versus time plot. Adapted from [47].](profile/O-Malandraki/publication/358625990/figure/fig5/AS:1171903951704065@1656415083600/left-Time-evolution-of-directional-e-intensity-measurements-during-the-July-22-2020.png)
(left) Time evolution of directional e -intensity measurements during the July 22, 2020 event From top to bottom: 40.9-46.2 keV e -intensities observed by the four EPD apertures; pitch-angle coverage for each aperture; PAD with color-coded intensity for the same energy range shown in the first energy panel (top right) e -PAD by STEP at three different energy bands during the July 22 event (bottom right) SolO/RPW radio dynamic spectrum observed in association with the e -event and the e -c/v versus time plot. Adapted from [47].
Similar publications
Abstract Zero‐shot learning (ZSL) is to identify target categories without labeled data, in which semantic information is used to transfer knowledge from some seen categories. In the existing Generalized Zero‐Shot Learning (GZSL) methods, domains shift problem always appeared during generating feature stage. In order to solve this problem, a new me...
Citations
... Of course, new channels and a higher precision in the channels already observed would also test it. The framework may also have implications on the data (at much lower energies) provided by the ISeIS experiment (Christian et al. 2021;Malandraki et al. 2022) at the Parker Solar Probe. It seems clear that the combined analysis of the five different signals that we propose would draw a more complete picture of the solar magnetism and of the propagation of CRs near the surface. ...
High energy cosmic rays illuminate the Sun and produce an image that could be observed in up to five different channels: a cosmic-ray shadow (whose energy dependence has been studied by HAWC); a gamma-ray flux (observed at E ≤ 200 GeV by Fermi-LAT); a muon shadow (detected by ANTARES and IceCube); a neutron flux (undetected, as there are no hadronic calorimeters in space); a flux of high energy neutrinos. Since these signals are correlated, the ones already observed can be used to reduce the uncertainty in the still undetected ones. Here we define a simple setup that uses the Fermi-LAT and HAWC observations to imply very definite fluxes of neutrons and neutrinos from the solar disk. In particular, we provide a fit of the neutrino flux at 10 GeV–10 TeV that includes its dependence on the zenith angle and on the period of the solar cycle. This flux represents a neutrino floor in indirect dark matter searches. We show that in some benchmark models the current bounds on the dark matter–nucleon cross section push the solar signal below this neutrino floor.
