l-independence of nodes. Sketch of a generic graph, with node A at the center. The first, second and third neighbors of node A are respectively located within the yellow, pink, and gray region. The l-independent set of a graph is the set of nodes such that the distance between any two of them is larger than l. The black nodes (A, B, C and D) form the 2-independent set of the graph, as all of them are at a distance larger than 2 from each other. The black nodes together with the ones depicted in light blue form, instead, the 1-independent set. Note that the light blue nodes do not participate in the 2-independent set. Finally, the red nodes belong neither to the 1-independent set nor to the 2-independent set.

l-independence of nodes. Sketch of a generic graph, with node A at the center. The first, second and third neighbors of node A are respectively located within the yellow, pink, and gray region. The l-independent set of a graph is the set of nodes such that the distance between any two of them is larger than l. The black nodes (A, B, C and D) form the 2-independent set of the graph, as all of them are at a distance larger than 2 from each other. The black nodes together with the ones depicted in light blue form, instead, the 1-independent set. Note that the light blue nodes do not participate in the 2-independent set. Finally, the red nodes belong neither to the 1-independent set nor to the 2-independent set.

Source publication
Preprint
Full-text available
A wealth of evidence shows that real world networks are endowed with the small-world property i.e., that the maximal distance between any two of their nodes scales logarithmically rather than linearly with their size. In addition, most social networks are organized so that no individual is more than six connections apart from any other, an empirica...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... can now generalize the latter definition, and designate as a l-independent set S l the set of network's nodes such that the distance between any pair of its members is larger than l [13]. It follows that nodes belonging to S l do not necessarily belong to S l+1 (see Fig. 2 for an illustrative sketch of the comparison between a 2-independent set and a classical 1-independent ...
Context 2
... the number of alternative shortest paths may be very large in large sized networks, the minimum possible benefit obtained from gluing a 1-independent set (as node 7 would do by forming edges with nodes 1 and 2) may be very small with the growth of When only black links are considered, vertices 1,2,7 form a 1-independent set. For consistency with Fig. 2, nodes 1 and 2 are colored in light blue. As vertex 7 forms the yellow edges (7,1) and (7,2) it is removed from the 1-independent set (this change is depicted by coloring the lowest part of the node in yellow), but the two new connections do not remove nodes 1 and 2 from the 1-independent set, since they only contribute to the ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
A wealth of evidence shows that real-world networks are endowed with the small-world property, i.e., that the maximal distance between any two of their nodes scales logarithmically rather than linearly with their size. In addition, most social networks are organized so that no individual is more than six connections apart from any other, an empiric...