Fig 4 - uploaded by Luciana Ghermandi
Content may be subject to copyright.
Values and ranges of the variables soil removal (A) and the surface of soil removed (B) for each species. The number on either side of the bars indicates the minimum and maximum values.
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... grouped variables "soil removal" and "surface of soil removed" showed values highly variable among species and within the same species (Fig. 4). The mean mound weight ranged from 1.1 kg for T. bottae to 14.8 kg for C. mendocinus, higher among Ctenomys species than the Thomomys species (Fig. 4A). The mean mound volume ranged from 1 dm 3 for T. bottae to 14 100 dm 3 for D. spectabilis (see Fig. 4A; the last species is not shown in the gure). Geomys attwateri had the highest ...
Context 2
... grouped variables "soil removal" and "surface of soil removed" showed values highly variable among species and within the same species (Fig. 4). The mean mound weight ranged from 1.1 kg for T. bottae to 14.8 kg for C. mendocinus, higher among Ctenomys species than the Thomomys species (Fig. 4A). The mean mound volume ranged from 1 dm 3 for T. bottae to 14 100 dm 3 for D. spectabilis (see Fig. 4A; the last species is not shown in the gure). Geomys attwateri had the highest value of mean burrow volume (0.9 m 3 ), while the values of the other species ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 m 3 (see Fig. 4A). The mound volume per area ranged ...
Context 3
... of soil removed" showed values highly variable among species and within the same species (Fig. 4). The mean mound weight ranged from 1.1 kg for T. bottae to 14.8 kg for C. mendocinus, higher among Ctenomys species than the Thomomys species (Fig. 4A). The mean mound volume ranged from 1 dm 3 for T. bottae to 14 100 dm 3 for D. spectabilis (see Fig. 4A; the last species is not shown in the gure). Geomys attwateri had the highest value of mean burrow volume (0.9 m 3 ), while the values of the other species ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 m 3 (see Fig. 4A). The mound volume per area ranged from 0.1 m 3 /ha for D. spectabilis to 346.5 m 3 /ha for C. azarae, and Thomomys bottae had the widest ...
Context 4
... Ctenomys species than the Thomomys species (Fig. 4A). The mean mound volume ranged from 1 dm 3 for T. bottae to 14 100 dm 3 for D. spectabilis (see Fig. 4A; the last species is not shown in the gure). Geomys attwateri had the highest value of mean burrow volume (0.9 m 3 ), while the values of the other species ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 m 3 (see Fig. 4A). The mound volume per area ranged from 0.1 m 3 /ha for D. spectabilis to 346.5 m 3 /ha for C. azarae, and Thomomys bottae had the widest range (2.8 to 54.1 m 3 /ha) (see Fig. 4A). The mean mound area ranged from 0.02 m 2 for G. pinetis to 14.3 m 2 for D. spectabilis (Fig. 4B). The lowest mean burrow area was recorded for Microtus ...
Context 5
... is not shown in the gure). Geomys attwateri had the highest value of mean burrow volume (0.9 m 3 ), while the values of the other species ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 m 3 (see Fig. 4A). The mound volume per area ranged from 0.1 m 3 /ha for D. spectabilis to 346.5 m 3 /ha for C. azarae, and Thomomys bottae had the widest range (2.8 to 54.1 m 3 /ha) (see Fig. 4A). The mean mound area ranged from 0.02 m 2 for G. pinetis to 14.3 m 2 for D. spectabilis (Fig. 4B). The lowest mean burrow area was recorded for Microtus ochrogaster (0.7 m 2 ), whereas the highest was for G. attwateri (202 m 2 ). The rest of the species had intermediate values: S. cyanus (130 m 2 ), T. talpoides (55 m 2 ), T. bottae ...
Context 6
... ), while the values of the other species ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 m 3 (see Fig. 4A). The mound volume per area ranged from 0.1 m 3 /ha for D. spectabilis to 346.5 m 3 /ha for C. azarae, and Thomomys bottae had the widest range (2.8 to 54.1 m 3 /ha) (see Fig. 4A). The mean mound area ranged from 0.02 m 2 for G. pinetis to 14.3 m 2 for D. spectabilis (Fig. 4B). The lowest mean burrow area was recorded for Microtus ochrogaster (0.7 m 2 ), whereas the highest was for G. attwateri (202 m 2 ). The rest of the species had intermediate values: S. cyanus (130 m 2 ), T. talpoides (55 m 2 ), T. bottae (35 m 2 ), C. mendocinus (25 m 2 ), and C. talarum (8 m 2 ). The area occupied by fresh mounds ...
Context 7
... Microtus ochrogaster (0.7 m 2 ), whereas the highest was for G. attwateri (202 m 2 ). The rest of the species had intermediate values: S. cyanus (130 m 2 ), T. talpoides (55 m 2 ), T. bottae (35 m 2 ), C. mendocinus (25 m 2 ), and C. talarum (8 m 2 ). The area occupied by fresh mounds ranged from 0.4% for C. talarum to 6.5% for T. talpoides (see Fig. 4B). Ctenomys mendocinus presented a wide range for the area occupied by mounds (0.34%-17.4%), and for the mound density (66-9100 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B). The mound density of C. ludovicianus varied from 61 to 85 mounds/ha, and that of D. spectabilis varied from 0.3 to 16 mounds/ha, representing the lowest values. Geomys attwateri was ...
Context 8
... m 2 ), T. talpoides (55 m 2 ), T. bottae (35 m 2 ), C. mendocinus (25 m 2 ), and C. talarum (8 m 2 ). The area occupied by fresh mounds ranged from 0.4% for C. talarum to 6.5% for T. talpoides (see Fig. 4B). Ctenomys mendocinus presented a wide range for the area occupied by mounds (0.34%-17.4%), and for the mound density (66-9100 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B). The mound density of C. ludovicianus varied from 61 to 85 mounds/ha, and that of D. spectabilis varied from 0.3 to 16 mounds/ha, representing the lowest values. Geomys attwateri was the species with the widest range for the fresh mound density (2-1220 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B), and the highest values were registered for T. bottae and ...
Context 9
... (0.34%-17.4%), and for the mound density (66-9100 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B). The mound density of C. ludovicianus varied from 61 to 85 mounds/ha, and that of D. spectabilis varied from 0.3 to 16 mounds/ha, representing the lowest values. Geomys attwateri was the species with the widest range for the fresh mound density (2-1220 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B), and the highest values were registered for T. bottae and T. talpoides (3750 and 2500 mounds/ha, respectively). Burrow entrance density showed large values for S. cyanus (33 000- 47 000/ha) and T. bottae (35 930/ha) (see Fig. 4B), whereas the lowest values were registered for C. ludovicianus and Cynomys leucurus (21 and 25/ha, ...
Context 10
... values. Geomys attwateri was the species with the widest range for the fresh mound density (2-1220 mounds/ha) (see Fig. 4B), and the highest values were registered for T. bottae and T. talpoides (3750 and 2500 mounds/ha, respectively). Burrow entrance density showed large values for S. cyanus (33 000- 47 000/ha) and T. bottae (35 930/ha) (see Fig. 4B), whereas the lowest values were registered for C. ludovicianus and Cynomys leucurus (21 and 25/ha, respectively). For the burrow density, Dipodomys ingens and C. ludovicianus showed higher values and ranges (11-243 and 27-271 burrows/ha) concerning the other species, such as C. mendocinus (3-11 ...