a-e, shows the performance metrics of AODV over four mobility models (RWP, RPGM, GMM, and MGM) under CBR traffic type for parameter 4. In Fig. 5a, the throughput of AODV became lower when the network load is higher. This protocol is highest in throughput with RPGM and lowest with MGM and GMM. b, shows the PDF of AODV became lower when the network load is higher. This protocol is highest in PDF with RPGM and lowest with MGM and GMM. In c, the no. of packets loss in GMM and MGM is highest while in RPGM and RWP is lowest, the loss packet is increased when the node speed increased. d, shows the NRL of this protocol is decreases with large environment size for all mobility models. RPGM has low NRL than other mobility

a-e, shows the performance metrics of AODV over four mobility models (RWP, RPGM, GMM, and MGM) under CBR traffic type for parameter 4. In Fig. 5a, the throughput of AODV became lower when the network load is higher. This protocol is highest in throughput with RPGM and lowest with MGM and GMM. b, shows the PDF of AODV became lower when the network load is higher. This protocol is highest in PDF with RPGM and lowest with MGM and GMM. In c, the no. of packets loss in GMM and MGM is highest while in RPGM and RWP is lowest, the loss packet is increased when the node speed increased. d, shows the NRL of this protocol is decreases with large environment size for all mobility models. RPGM has low NRL than other mobility

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
The current study presents the simulative study and evaluation of MANET mobility models over UDP traffic pattern to determine the effects of this traffic pattern on mobility models in MANET which is implemented in NS-2.35 according to various performance metri (Throughput, AED (Average End-2-end Delay), drop packets, NRL (Normalize Routing Load) an...