Figure - uploaded by Bjarne Bjerg
Content may be subject to copyright.
Context in source publication
Context 1
... assumed air conditioning systems in configuration 7 was dimensioned so it was sufficient to avoid effective temperatures above 25 ⁰C, and resulted in electricity consumption increasing from 18 kWh sow -1 year -1 in Denmark to 2052 kWh sow -1 year -1 in the Philippines ( Table 1). The electricity consumption for ventilation ( Table 2) was used in calculation of the ratio between electricity consumption in configuration 7 (for ventilation and air conditioning) and in configuration 2 (for ventilation), and this ratio increased from 1.6 in Denmark to 19.7 in the Philippines (Table 1). of yearly hours in air conditioning mode, maximal cooling demand, electricity consumption for cooling (air conditioning) and the ratio between electricity consumption in configuration 7 (for ventilation plus air conditioning) Estimated maximal hourly water consumption for evaporative cooling ( Table 3) indicate relatively small difference between locations, whereas the estimated water consumption (Table 4), was entailed by very large differences between the investigated locations and peaked by 7.1 m 3 sow -1 h -1 at configuration 6 in Mexico. The calculated consumption is about twice the sows' need for drinking water. ...
