Figure 2 - uploaded by Ulugbek Nurmatov
Content may be subject to copyright.
Type of interventions (activities/socio-ecological domain) to safely reduce care entry and the gaps and clusters in their evidence base for Effect (do they reduce care entry?), Mechanisms/Moderators (how they work), Implementation (barriers/facilitators) and Economic considerations

Type of interventions (activities/socio-ecological domain) to safely reduce care entry and the gaps and clusters in their evidence base for Effect (do they reduce care entry?), Mechanisms/Moderators (how they work), Implementation (barriers/facilitators) and Economic considerations

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... studies examined interventions to reduce care entry (Figure 2, and see ...
Context 2
... to safely reduce care entry clustered around family-level interventions (Figure 2), with studies examining interventions that worked with the immediate or wider family to safely reduce the entry of children to care (68 studies). The majority of these studies examined a therapeutic approach (Effect = 26 studies, how it works (MM) = 25 studies, Implementation = 21 studies, Economic considerations = seven studies). ...

Similar publications

Experiment Findings
Full-text available
This scoping review aims to answer the following question: For children and young people, what are the active ingredients of effective school-wide anti-stigma/mental health awareness campaigns delivered within UK educational settings?