Figure 1
Context in source publication
Citations
... It is clear from measurements made so far that the implementation of 5G has indeed caused a massive increase in human and environmental exposure to pulse-modulated RF radiation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. ...
... We have previously published seven case reports on health effects in humans exposed to 5G RF radiation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The studies were performed during 2021-2023 and investigated health effects previously described to be associated with exposure to RF radiation among a total of 16 persons. ...
... The aim of this study was to make a summary of our seven case reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. One purpose was to investigate the severity and any pattern of different diseases/symptoms based on the total material. ...
The fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication is currently deployed in Sweden since 2019/2020, as well as in many other countries. We have previously published seven case reports that include a total of 16 persons aged between 4 and 83 years that developed the microwave syndrome within short time after being exposed to 5G base stations close to their dwellings. In all cases high radiofrequency (RF) radiation from 4G/5G was measured with a broadband meter. RF radiation reached >2,500,000 to >3,180,000 μW/m ² in peak maximum value in three of the studies. In total 41 different health issues were assessed for each person graded 0 (no complaint) to 10 (worst symptoms). Most prevalent and severe were sleeping difficultly (insomnia, waking night time, early wake-up), headache, fatique, irritability, concentration problems, loss of immediate memory, emotional distress, depression tendency, anxiety/panic, dysesthesia (unusual touched based sensations), burning and lancinating skin, cardiovascular symptoms (transitory high or irregular pulse), dyspnea, and pain in muscles and joints. Balance disorder and tinnitus were less prevalent. All these symptoms are included in the microwave syndrome. In most cases the symptoms declined and disappeared within a short time period after the studied persons had moved to a place with no 5G. These case histories are classical examples of provocation studies. They reinforce the urgency to inhibit the deployment of 5G until more safety studies have been performed.
... As a result of moving to dwellings with considerably lower levels of RF radiation, the symptoms decreased and complete health was regained within a short time period. This may be regarded as provocation studies of health effects from real life 5G exposure [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. ...
... ICBE-EMF, Health Council of the Netherlands and the EU Parliament's STOA, have concluded that there are insufficient or no studies on health impacts from 5G millimeter waves [11,19,20]. As mentioned before, to date, only seven case studies have examined the health impact of real-life exposure to radiation from 5G antennas deployed at frequencies around 3.5 GHz [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. All showed rapidly developing adverse health impacts. ...
This Mini Review has two aims.
The first is to analyse six case reports on actual health effects of 5G radiofrequency
radiation (RFR), comparing the results with concerns for similar RFR.
The second is to relate these reports to setting restrictions suitable for all, including for persons with intolerance to environmental RFR. Adverse health effects from
5G RFR occur below current thermal restrictions. Therefore, restrictions need to be at non-thermal levels based on a threshold, as for a No Observable Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL). Ecological evidence suggests a suitable restriction including a safety factor of ten should be set at 0.06 μW/m2 (0.005 V/m).
