Table 2 - uploaded by John Anzola
Content may be subject to copyright.
Download
View publication
Thematic less explored in the internet of things

Thematic less explored in the internet of things

Source publication
Table 1. Format for processing 
Fig. 1. Components of text mining  
Fig. 2. Model data/text mining process  
Table 2 . Thematic less explored in the internet of things
Fig. 4. State of the art, built with the J48 classifier  
State of the Art Construction Based on the J48 Classifier: Case Study of Internet of Things
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Aug 2015
The bibliometric technics allow us to illustrate aspects of interpretation of data obtained through data bases that are focus in science spreading, which offers an aggregated value to researchers. In this article, we explore the importance of such obtained information from articles’ query; in this particular case study the Internet of Things (IoT)....
Cite
Download full-text

Context in source publication

Context 1
... and Google Scholar databases. These results were obtained on January 30th 2015 and they are shown in Table 2. ...

Similar publications

Fig.1. System Model of the Proposed Methodology  
Table 2 . Structure of Transformed Web Video Metadata Dataset
Fig.3. Tree Structure Result of J48 Classification Model  
Table 4 . Classification Result of J48 and Navie Bayesian...
Web Video Mining: Metadata Predictive Analysis using Classification Techniques
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2016
Now a days, the Data Engineering becoming emerging trend to discover knowledge from web audiovisual data such as- YouTube videos, Yahoo Screen, Face Book videos etc. Different categories of web video are being shared on such social websites and are being used by the billions of users all over the world. The uploaded web videos will have different k...
View
Fig 1. An example topic from LibraryThing.com....
Fig 2. Framework of ISART, which composes of three major steps: (1)...
Table 6 . Reranking results (NDCG@10) with social information on the...
Table 7 . Results with Random Forest.
+6 Table 10 . Comparisons of effectiveness with different pairs of methods.
ISART: A Generic Framework for Searching Books with Social Information
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2016
Effective book search has been discussed for decades and is still future-proof in areas as diverse as computer science, informatics, e-commerce and even culture and arts. A variety of social information contents (e.g, ratings, tags and reviews) emerge with the huge number of books on the Web, but how they are utilized for searching and finding book...
View

Citations

Global Research Productivity in Knowledge Management: an Analysis of Scopus Database
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2020
The main objective of this study is to investigate and analyze global research productivity in knowledge management (KM) research published from 1960 to 2017 and indexed in Scopus database. It is the first scientometric study investigating and analyzing 56 years of KM literature indexed in Scopus. The study used scientometric approach to identify and analyze bibliographic information of 63474 documents retrieved, in August 2018, from Scopus database. KM research productivity has grown from a single digit in 1960 to four digits in 2003. The results of the study indicate that, for the past 20 years (1997-2017), KM research recorded 63141 documents compared to 333 documents in 36 years (1960-1996), and the year 2009 emerged as the most productive year. China appeared leading the world in respect to the institutional productivity and took the second position, after the USA, as the most productive country in KM research. Findings of the study showed conference proceedings leading the types of publications followed by the journals, and book series. The “Journal of Knowledge Management” leads the top 10 journals in the number of publications, while the journal of “Expert Systems with Applications” top the list in the number of citations. A total of 4134 unique contributors produced an average of 15.35 papers from 1960-2017; and the top three authors are from Australia, USA, and Norway. Findings of the study could be a useful report for knowledge workers, academic institutions, and government agencies who are interested in improving KM projects and scientific research.
View