Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... of single-criteria evaluation of the adopted options for mine decommissioning 3.2.1. Assessment due to the amount of expenditures on mine decommissioning Table 2 summarizes the estimated costs of mine closure in the 18 cases analyzed. As expected, the calculations show that the cheapest closure option is Option V, followed by Option III. ...
Context 2
... closure, there will be no need for further expenditure on the maintenance of shafts and underground workings. According to the assumptions of the assessment, with a larger number of selected variants, due to the amount of expenditures for carrying out decommissioning processes (Table 2), the selection of Variant III is recommended for implementation. ...
Context 3
... criterion for assessing the duration of the decommissioning processes is met by all variants e in each of them the decommissioning can take two, three or four years. According to the assumptions of the assessment, with a larger number of selected variants, due to the volume of expenditures for carrying out decommissioning processes (Table 2), the selection of variant V is recommended for implementation. ...
Context 4
... means that all shafts and underground workings can be completely decommissioned, which is the case for Alternatives I, II and III. According to the assumptions of the assessment, with a larger number of selected variants, due to the size of expenditures for carrying out the decommissioning processes (Table 2), the selection of variant III is recommended for implementation. ...
Context 5
... evaluated variants meet the criterion of providing protection to neighboring mining sites equally. According to the assumptions of the assessment, with a larger number of selected variants, due to the size of the expenditures for carrying out decommissioning processes (Table 2), the selection of Variant V is recommended for implementation. ...