Figure 4 - Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens

The results of the different stacking methods in Helicon Focus: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B result of Method A (average) C, D result of Method B (depth) E, F result of Method C (pyramid).

Go to figure page

Reference

Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-results-of-the-different-stacking-methods-in-Helicon-Focus-each-stacking-option-is_fig3_269630893 [accessed 2 Jun, 2023]

Caption

Figure 4. The results of the different stacking methods in Helicon Focus: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B result of Method A (average) C, D result of Method B (depth) E, F result of Method C (pyramid).

Embed code

<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-results-of-the-different-stacking-methods-in-Helicon-Focus-each-stacking-option-is_fig3_269630893"><img src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jonathan-Brecko/publication/269630893/figure/fig3/AS:614007283130386@1523402152923/The-results-of-the-different-stacking-methods-in-Helicon-Focus-each-stacking-option-is.png" alt="The results of the different stacking methods in Helicon Focus: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B result of Method A (average) C, D result of Method B (depth) E, F result of Method C (pyramid)."/></a>