The bijection from Claim 1. The additional step in W ′ is the East step leading to (−i, i).

The bijection from Claim 1. The additional step in W ′ is the East step leading to (−i, i).

Source publication
Preprint
Full-text available
Let $\iota_{k}(m,l)$ denote the total number of intervals of length $m$ across all Dyck paths of semilength $k$ such that each interval contains precisely $l$ falls. We give the formula for $\iota_{k}(m,l)$ and show that $\iota_{k}(k,l)=\binom{k}{l}^2$. Motivated by this, we propose two stronger variants of the wreath conjecture due to Baranyai for...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... Figure 4 for an illustration. The maps from the previous two paragraphs are inverses to each other, and hence describe the desired bijection, see Figure 5 for an illustration. ...